The slippery slope - XP running on a Mac
Discussion
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology
"All your base are belong to us".
>> Edited by FourWheelDrift on Friday 17th March 22:34
bbc said:
Hackers have managed to get Microsoft's Windows XP operating system running on an Apple Mac computer.
The success ends a competition started to see if the feat was even possible when Apple unveiled computers that used Intel chips.
The pair who managed the feat won $13,854 (£7,895) in prize money for their trouble.
The software used to put Windows on the Mac is now being circulated so others can try to replicate the success.
"All your base are belong to us".
>> Edited by FourWheelDrift on Friday 17th March 22:34
aldi said:
Looks like a mac is going to be the machine of choice in the future... next question is how long till OSX is running on a PC?
Was using a Dell running OS X last week. Guy in one of our Uni departments has managed to get it working. Required quite a lot of hacking of the BIOS apparently, but it definitely works.
Those running OS X on non-Apple hardware are most probably using the first developer seed Apple released. Available to download via torrent or P2P for quite some time now.
Supposedly Apple have now fixed this.
When's it been anything else?
XP on a Mac
Hopefully Apple will rectify this asap.
Supposedly Apple have now fixed this.
Don said:
What this means is that a Mac is just a PC. A nice, groovy looking, nicely designed PC.
When's it been anything else?
XP on a Mac
Hopefully Apple will rectify this asap.
OS X's kernel is available for x86 platforms from Apple's website; long before Apple released plans about using Intel hardware http://developer.apple.com/opensource
What's the point of using Macintosh without the hardware it comes with anyway? Isn't it the core strategy from Apple to guarantee driver stability for dedicated components rather than letting 3rd party manufacturers supply unapproved system critical software?
What's the point of using Macintosh without the hardware it comes with anyway? Isn't it the core strategy from Apple to guarantee driver stability for dedicated components rather than letting 3rd party manufacturers supply unapproved system critical software?
Bodo said:
Isn't it the core strategy from Apple to guarantee driver stability for dedicated components rather than letting 3rd party manufacturers supply unapproved system critical software?
The core strategy from apple is to keep a stragle hold on the OS and hardware manufacture for their platform. Money is their motivation.
mindgam3 said:
You forgot ludicrously overpriced :P
We actually find the cost of ownership in the education environment much much cheaper than a PC. The thing with our Mac's is that they last a lot longer, being able to run the latest OS, without upgrades, whereas our PC's (not shabby spec either) start to struggle after 2 years and after 3 years are on their knees. The older Mac's are actually getting faster as the OS becomes more and more optimised.
Gassing Station | Computers, Gadgets & Stuff | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






