RE: Astons score at Sebring
RE: Astons score at Sebring
Monday 20th March 2006

Astons score at Sebring

But diesel Audi R10 wins on its debut


Aston Martin DBR9 at Sebring
Aston Martin DBR9 at Sebring
Last night in Florida, the Aston Martin Racing team finished the 12 Hours of Sebring endurance race in second and third place after a thrilling finale in the GT1 competition.

Interestingly though, Le Mans winner Audi kicked off its campaign with a diesel sportscar, the R10, which was the winning car yesterday. At the diesel's race debut, it was driven by Allan McNish, Rinaldo Capello and Tom Kristensen.

Meanwhile, the DBR9s ran faultlessly throughout the race. Between them, the classic green cars, numbered 007 and 009, completed 661 laps of the 3.7 mile Sebring international raceway, covering a total of 2,445 miles at speeds of up to 168mph. Team driver Tomas Enge set the fastest GT1 lap of the race (1min 56.573.sec) in car 007.

The driving team of Pedro Lamy, Stéphane Sarrazin and Jason Bright brought Aston Martin number 009 home in second place, with a total of 337 laps, after a long battle with the class winning number four Corvette. After 12 hours of racing, the gap between the pair was 1min 28sec. The team’s sister car, number 007, driven by Tomas Enge, Darren Turner and Nicolas Kiesa, was involved in another transatlantic tussle with the second American Corvette entry that culminated in a nail biting battle to the chequered flag. Tomas Enge drove a double stint to finish the race third and keep the hard chasing Corvette behind.

The opening round of the 2006 American Le Mans Series (ALMS) started at 1045hrs in dry and sunny conditions. By midday the temperature of the 17-turn concrete circuit had reached 36°C. The Aston Martin Racing cars had qualified in first and second place but the early hot and slippery conditions proved tricky for both cars. With limited experience of their new Pirelli tyres, the team had to work hard and learn fast to keep up with the competition.

Darren Turner drove the first stint in the 007 car and held the GT1 lead for the first 20 laps. “I was happy with the start, we got away well and kept a nice pace for the first ten laps but by about lap 14 we really started to suffer with the rear of the car over-steering and by lap 20 I was more concerned with keeping it on track than keeping the opposition behind me.”

At the half way point, car number 009 led the team’s charge. After making adjustments to the set up of their DBR9, the driving crew of Lamy, Sarrazin and Bright reported improved balance and less of the oversteer that had caused problems earlier. Having completed 165 laps of the 3.7mile circuit, the 009 Aston Martin held third place in GT1, but slipped one lap behind the leader after being caught behind the safety car. DBR9 number 007 was fourth in GT1, but thirteen laps behind the leader after an incident on lap 121 forced a 20 minute repair stop. The car returned to the garage when the bonnet and part of the front wings, previously damaged in a spin, flew off as it negotiated a high speed section of the circuit. 

Nine hours in, with 250 laps completed and headlamps blazing in the darkness, the team was second and third in GT1. A reliable and consistent performance from the number 009 DBR9, together with some mechanical problems for the Corvette ahead, helped move the red-nosed Aston Martin of Lamy, Sarrazin and Bright to second in class. After gaining a position in their own Corvette battle, the number 007 car of Enge, Turner and Kiesa was third. 

In the closing stages of the race, the drivers of Aston Martin number 009 consolidated their second place, while in the 007 car Tomas Enge was locked in the battle with the number three Corvette. For the last ten laps the pair was separated by less than a second. 

Author
Discussion

NJW 77

Original Poster:

17,065 posts

255 months

Monday 20th March 2006
quotequote all
Go Aston

At least I know who to cheer for at LM 2006 as TVR are not running, alledgedly

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

299 months

Monday 20th March 2006
quotequote all
Pfuh... beaten by a diesel...

goo-goo-gjoob

812 posts

272 months

Monday 20th March 2006
quotequote all
Congrats Aston!

vlad

33 posts

239 months

Monday 20th March 2006
quotequote all
diesel engines for astons from now on then

john75

5,303 posts

264 months

Monday 20th March 2006
quotequote all
Must have been scary when Darren lost his bonnet.

racefan_uk

2,935 posts

273 months

Monday 20th March 2006
quotequote all
john75 said:
Must have been scary when Darren lost his bonnet.


He said not really on the radio during the race. Said it happened that quickly it was over before he'd had time to think about it and just got on with it.

As for them being beaten by a diesel. You did know they were in a different category, right?
The news item is very bizarre. Did it come from Aston Martin? As it only skims over the fact that Audi have just become the first team/manufacturer to win an international motor race with a diesel powered car. Slightly more of a news story than Aston's finishing behind a Corvette after 12 hours.

Ahonen

5,030 posts

296 months

Monday 20th March 2006
quotequote all
racefan_uk said:

The news item is very bizarre. Did it come from Aston Martin?


It's just an Aston press release.

suryade

57 posts

237 months

Monday 20th March 2006
quotequote all
Nice job Aston! Great job Audi! Woot!

Is it just me or are the Le Mans a tad bit more interesting than F1? I mean sure Schumi is not winning anymore but its more to Ferrari's weak car than his talent I am thinking but still...too many rules and regulations. Dead sport this F1.

kahmed79

22 posts

297 months

Monday 20th March 2006
quotequote all
I find ALMS to be much more interesting than F1 also. The Aston guys did a great job because the Corvette's are very hard to beat. I used to work with some of the senior engineers on the Corvette racing team but always wanted Aston to win. The Corvette's had better handling but the Aston's had more power and pulled away on the straights. Btw, there are a couple AM DBRS9's running in the Speed GT championship. Unfortunately they didn't finish quite as well as the DBR9's.

runnersp

1,061 posts

237 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
Its a sad day in motorsport when an Aston Martin gets beaten by a diesel Audi, endurance racing will never be the same again.

ahonen

5,030 posts

296 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
runnersp said:
Its a sad day in motorsport when an Aston Martin gets beaten by a diesel Audi, endurance racing will never be the same again.


Silly comment. They're in different classes - Aston Martin was beaten by a Corvette, while Audi won overall.

It is not a sad day, it's the beginning of a new era.

racefan_uk

2,935 posts

273 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
runnersp said:
Its a sad day in motorsport when an Aston Martin gets beaten by a diesel Audi, endurance racing will never be the same again.


You are joking, right? You are aware that there is more than one class of sportscar racing and that the Aston and Audi weren't competing in the same class?
If not, I suggest some reading up would be a good idea.

GCerbera

5,161 posts

268 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
I was working while watching the great coverage on Motors TV and the Corvette / Aston battles
were wonderful, especially with the in car footage at the end....didn't get much work done!

Well done also to Panoz, glad to see them winning again...even if that did have a certain driver who I personally can't stand.

Congrats also goes to LNT, a mighty fine 5th in class in their debut in the Panoz and 14th overall. I think the team will shake up the tree in British GT and LMES this season.

Final thought, has there ever been another driver who seemingly walks directly to the winners podium? Well done Tom Kristensen, please can I send you my lottery tickets to fill in?

kingb

1,157 posts

243 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
runnersp said:
Its a sad day in motorsport when an Aston Martin gets beaten by a diesel Audi, endurance racing will never be the same again.


why is it a bad thing that a diesel can win. its not that astons have become crappy and were beaten by a rubish diesel. the astons were very good but it shows that diesel cars can be fast and fun in the future. it shows diesels have become good. drop the steriotype and have a look at what really happening

dinkel

27,523 posts

275 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
Nice reading here.

"The car "feels like an Audi," Capello says, except with way more torque."

Le Mans: place your bets.

runnersp

1,061 posts

237 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
I should correct my earlier statement. Of course the Aston is in a different class, but i still would have liked to see it take the overall win, as impossible as that sounds. As for the rest I don't see why audi couldn't modify the R8 to fit in to these new rules, however i admit to not knowing why these new regulations rendered it obsolete. The R10 seems to be a marketing excersise, a very well-engineered, well developed marketing excersise, but no more. Sure it'll have the advantage with fuel consumption and so on, but i just don't see the point. Purely from a development costs standpoint i imagine they could have evolved on the older car and still come up with something world-beating. Plus I just really don't like diesels.

>> Edited by runnersp on Tuesday 21st March 12:55

NJW 77

Original Poster:

17,065 posts

255 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
runnersp said:
. The R10 seems to be a marketing excersise, a very well-engineered, well developed marketing excersise, but no more. Sure it'll have the advantage with fuel consumption and so on, but i just don't see the point.
>> Edited by runnersp on Tuesday 21st March 12:44


And its got you talking about Audi diesels, which Im guessing was the point of the exercise, particularly IIRC, something like 50% of the smaller Audis sold are diesel variants. Job done for Audi methinks.


Has no one mentioned the diesel powered F1 powerboat/s? (Lambo?)

Diesel! Its been coming for a while Im afraid. Still, got to Audi for the achievement

ahonen

5,030 posts

296 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
Motor racing is one big marketing exercise, which is a major reason for them to go the diesel route. In the US, as fuel prices creep higher, the modern diesel will start to make an impact, so Audi is getting ahead of the game there - plus the technology they develop will filter down to road cars as has happened throughout Audi's motorsport history (quattro, PDK (now DSG) gearboxes, FSi etc). The US still has a 'win on Sunday, sell on Monday' mentality, which is great. It's why Toyota will be in NASCAR next year.

The changes in chassis rules won't allow the conventional R8 to compete at Le Mans this year (though it can and will still run in ALMS), so Audi would either have to build a 'hybrid' with an old chassis and new bodywork or just build a new car, which is what they've done. Audi could have built a conventional petrol car like everyone else and walked away from the field, but they decided to set themselves a challenge instead - and the PR gained from that first diesel Le Mans victory in June will be well worth the investment.

While BMW spends a fortune in F1 and suffers a selection of very public engine failures, Audi will spend a fraction of the budget winning LM and proving genuine technology. A win-win scenario if every there was one...

franv8

2,212 posts

255 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
Well done Corvette again! It looks similar to the Ferrari/Corvette battle in the last few years - Corvette doesn't have the edge on out and out speed, but wins with the whole package.

vetteheadracer

8,273 posts

270 months

Wednesday 22nd March 2006
quotequote all
franv8 said:
Well done Corvette again! It looks similar to the Ferrari/Corvette battle in the last few years - Corvette doesn't have the edge on out and out speed, but wins with the whole package.


Corvette won? Surely not! Where does it say that in the Aston Martin press release?