First Person Perspective games
First Person Perspective games
Author
Discussion

meeja

Original Poster:

8,290 posts

270 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
Hi all,

Simple question:

I am running an "average" PC (Fairly decent Athlon) with a very average Video Card (128mB)

Love first person shooters, the last game I got totally immersed in was Half-Life.

Any recommendations for similar style games that don't need a beast of a PC to run?... am happy to look at games a few years old as they are more likelyto be able to run at decent quality on my system.

Donwloadable demo versions are preferable too, so i can try before I buy!!!

dougc

8,240 posts

287 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
I quite liked Soldier of Fortune II which falls nicely into the 'looks good on a warm PC' category. Should be as cheap as chips on Amazon too.

FourWheelDrift

91,674 posts

306 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
Look at Battlefield 2, there is a downloadable demo here 1st person perpesctive but working alongside others - www.download.com/Battlefield-2-demo/3000-7452_4-10404526.html

Another to see is Far Cry - www.farcry-thegame.com/uk/demo.php

What about something older like Return to Castle Wolfenstein - www.idsoftware.com/games/wolfenstein/rtcw/

mindgam3

740 posts

258 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
If you like multiplayer, Battlefield 2 is the ultimate.

Medal of Honour (1,2)
Call of Duty (1,2)
Brothers in arms

Are a few others

jitsukadave

2,101 posts

278 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
I bet half-life 2 would run ok on your system. You may not be able to run it with mad water effects etc, but my PC is pretty average too, and I don't have any issues with hl2 (though I don't think it has the full-on immersion of the first one though).

Did you get the expansion packs for hl? Opposing forces was very well made, and a very big game too.

FourWheelDrift

91,674 posts

306 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
Hlaf Life - Blue Shift as well.

ukbob

16,277 posts

287 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
mindgam3 said:

Medal of Honour (1,2)
Seconded. But try far cry. Its processor intensive, but you can whack the settings down and still enjoy the gameplay which is superb.

meeja

Original Poster:

8,290 posts

270 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
Thanks guys!

Zad

12,934 posts

258 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
Far Cry and HL2 should both be fine. Far Cry was *just* playable on my old P3 with 64MB graphics and HL2 was surprisingly fast. OK, maybe fast isn't the right word, but it was playable and looked amazing, not that much different to how it looks now on an X2 with 256MB 7800GT.

It's a shame that they never produced sequels to Ultima Underworld 2, UU1 came out in the same month as the original Wolfenstein but was overshadowed despite having far better graphics, a decent plot and nonlinear gameplay that needed thought rather than mindless shooting.

If Medal of Honor is too slow, you could try Hidden & Dangerous. It's still a great 1st person shooter but with more emphasis on stealth and strategy. When H&D2 came out, the publishers made the original version available for free download! Google and ye shall find. I'm reluctant to mention any specific site because I don't want to download 260MB and find it's faulty.



Zad

12,934 posts

258 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
Oops, the Underworld thing just reminded me, the UU producer Warren Spector developed other 1st-person 3D games too. System Shock (and later SS2) was a space station themed game, where the computer had gone wild and taken over control. Standard zombie stuff but a worthwhile game that is much more than the standard shoot-em-up, although it was irritating because it used to respawn baddies behind you after you had killed em (which was removable with a patch).

The Thief series started around the same time but finished more recently. Thief 1 ran on a 486, Thief 2 ran well on a P3-550, Thief 3 struggled but was just playable on a P3, on your system it should be fine. It is a stealth game, with Thief 3 being particularly atmospheric. The Shalebridge / Cradle level has to be one of the scariest game levels ever.

.Adam.

1,861 posts

285 months

Tuesday 28th March 2006
quotequote all
Older games, around the time of the original Half life, but have you played Deus Ex or System Shock 2. Both really good games.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

266 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
.Adam. said:
System Shock 2. Both really good games.

Apart from the cardboard guns that break every twenty seconds.

steve_evil

10,799 posts

251 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
Zad said:
Oops, the Underworld thing just reminded me, the UU producer Warren Spector developed other 1st-person 3D games too. System Shock (and later SS2) was a space station themed game, where the computer had gone wild and taken over control. Standard zombie stuff but a worthwhile game that is much more than the standard shoot-em-up, although it was irritating because it used to respawn baddies behind you after you had killed em (which was removable with a patch).

The Thief series started around the same time but finished more recently. Thief 1 ran on a 486, Thief 2 ran well on a P3-550, Thief 3 struggled but was just playable on a P3, on your system it should be fine. It is a stealth game, with Thief 3 being particularly atmospheric. The Shalebridge / Cradle level has to be one of the scariest game levels ever.



At last someone else who appreciates Thief 3 and the cradle level, have been banging on about it to everyone who goes on about scary games, they are not a patch on the fear I felt wandering around that place.