Boxster faults
Author
Discussion

Tricia B

Original Poster:

2 posts

245 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
I'm planning to buy an early 2.7 Boxster for everyday use (10,000-miles plus per year) but hear all sorts of horror stories about engine failures at low mileages. I'd welcome any advice about common serious Boxster faults and how to check for them.
Thanks

BliarOut

72,863 posts

267 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
Fabulous cars, buy one and enjoy. The RMS tales are an over hyped internet horror story. Have it changed every time the clutch is done for about £60 and enjoy

cyrus1971

855 posts

267 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
The risk and impact is not over hyped.

It affects many 2.5, 2.7 and 3.4 L cars... some say as high as 5% of them. If advice above is correct then suggest you do replace the RMS every clutch change, if car not a tiptronic. The problem is not the RMS it is what a catastrophic failure causes. Friend of mine's 996 C2 cab with a 3.4 Litre unit had it's engine melt last year in 10 miles of town driving. He had a warrantee you may not.

A Boxster is however an excellent car dynamically and don’t let this issue erode what could be a beautiful friendship. It’s only a risk if you do noting to mitigate it.

supermono

7,464 posts

276 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
I think the main fault with Boxsters is that they're not as good as 911s



Oh, come on I'm just kidding around!

SM

anniesdad

14,589 posts

266 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
Past and present Boxster owners let's have a show of hands of who's had an engine failure/RMS?

Maybe the 987 doesn't count but no problems to report here - in fact no problems with the car at all. She's now done over 13K miles.

Buy one.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

267 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
supermono said:
I think the main fault with Boxsters is that they're not as good as 911s



Oh, come on I'm just kidding around!

SM
Ahem, I might be going back to a Boxster from a 996

maxxuk

341 posts

247 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
supermono said:
I think the main fault with Boxsters is that they're not as good as 911s



Oh, come on I'm just kidding around!

SM
Ahem, I might be going back to a Boxster from a 996


What happened to wanting a Tuscan ??

maxxuk

341 posts

247 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
supermono said:
I think the main fault with Boxsters is that they're not as good as 911s



Oh, come on I'm just kidding around!

SM
Ahem, I might be going back to a Boxster from a 996


What happened to wanting a Tuscan ??

maxxuk

341 posts

247 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
DOH !!!... Stupid Pooter

anniesdad

14,589 posts

266 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
maxxuk said:
DOH !!!... Stupid Pooter


There is a "delete post" option, but not now that I've posted.

Don

28,378 posts

312 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
maxxuk said:
BliarOut said:
supermono said:
I think the main fault with Boxsters is that they're not as good as 911s



Oh, come on I'm just kidding around!

SM
Ahem, I might be going back to a Boxster from a 996


What happened to wanting a Tuscan ??


Yes, BliarOut: what happened to wanting a Tuscan? What's disappointing you about the 996 Cab?

BliarOut

72,863 posts

267 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
Don said:
maxxuk said:
BliarOut said:
supermono said:
I think the main fault with Boxsters is that they're not as good as 911s



Oh, come on I'm just kidding around!

SM
Ahem, I might be going back to a Boxster from a 996


What happened to wanting a Tuscan ??


Yes, BliarOut: what happened to wanting a Tuscan? What's disappointing you about the 996 Cab?
Choices choices I just don't feel as involved with the 996 as I did with the Boxster. The 911 boys will wail and holler, but the 996 doesn't handle as well. Admittedly mine's a cab so it won't have the same chassis rigidity, but the Boxster just steers so sublimely. You can't carry speed into a corner in the 996 in the same way you can in the Boxster.

Also, mine's tiptronic and however good it is you can't drag the clutch on the way into the corners so sometimes you are in the wrong gear. A manual 996 is on the swap list too. A Tuscan is still high on the list but I have had conversations only this very morning with an ex Tiv owner that make me wonder a bit.

I always wanted an UberBoxster and with prices as they are a used S in P/ex for mine leaves a lot of money to have even more HP than the 996 but with better handling. I'll be dillying and dallying for a while yet I fear!

whoami

13,199 posts

268 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
cyrus1971 said:
The risk and impact is not over hyped.

It affects many 2.5, 2.7 and 3.4 L cars... some say as high as 5% of them. If advice above is correct then suggest you do replace the RMS every clutch change, if car not a tiptronic. The problem is not the RMS it is what a catastrophic failure causes. Friend of mine's 996 C2 cab with a 3.4 Litre unit had it's engine melt last year in 10 miles of town driving. He had a warrantee you may not.

A Boxster is however an excellent car dynamically and don’t let this issue erode what could be a beautiful friendship. It’s only a risk if you do noting to mitigate it.


and 3.6 engines (x2 on my old 996)

and 3.8 engines (just got my 997 back today).

ballcock

3,855 posts

247 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
Forget the hype , All high performance cars have their quirky sides , the boxter less so than most. Don't buy the cheapest , get one with psh , make sure it at least LOOKS like it has been looked after well (ie simple things like kerbed tyres , scufs on the boot release catches etc are giveaways of the driver not cherishing his /her car).

muzaa

1,515 posts

261 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
i'll second that, go for a car with History, dont be afraid to look around, have it checked by an expert if you are not sure (i used peter morgan he's pretty good). If I was you I ignore the others and get a 993, 996's a trifle common....

If you want a boxster you shouldnt let the fact there is a common fault put you off, get a warranties if needed or have the RMS done when you get the car perhaps. Or better still get a 993.

ChrisW.

8,116 posts

283 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
Boxster = Fab car for everyday driving.

RMS = and excuse for knockers to have a go.

It is most unlikely that you would have a problem and for £800 ish Porsche will sell you a warranty that will cover this and almost everything else. And they make a profit from it !

whoami

13,199 posts

268 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
She asked about known problems and that's what people have provided.

No one is knocking the Boxter.

I used to have one and it was great.

Ironically, that car never had a problem with RMS.

ChrisW.

8,116 posts

283 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
But RMS is a very rare problem --- why make a meal of it ?

If I had seen this I may never have bought one.

Hence the comment.

Fab fab car.

ChrisW.

8,116 posts

283 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
But RMS is a very rare problem --- why make a meal of it ?

If I had seen this I may never have bought one.

Hence the comment.

Fab fab car.

whoami

13,199 posts

268 months

Friday 31st March 2006
quotequote all
ChrisW. said:
But RMS is a very rare problem --- why make a meal of it ?

If I had seen this I may never have bought one.

Hence the comment.

Fab fab car.


Chris,

no meal made, just stating a fact.

I've had the problem three times on two cars.

As I said, I loved the car.

Cheers

Neil.