Introducing a law on exceeding acceleration limits
Introducing a law on exceeding acceleration limits
Author
Discussion

John_S

Original Poster:

22 posts

304 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
Just a thought - We all know how the government, the transport departments and think tanks are making such a big issue over breaking speed limits, and have even gone as far as experimenting with black boxes and GPS speed zone engine governors. I was wondering how long it would be before they thought about a law regarding the limit at which you or your car can accelerate ?
Imagine the scene, a blue set of of lights appears in your rearview mirror. You pull over and stop. A cop comes over to the window and says "Excuse me sir, but do you know how fast you were accelerating ? I am afraid you were accelerating away from the roundabout at 10ft per sec squared and this is a 5ft per sec squared zone!! That would be a £80 pound fine and a manditory fitment of a 20mm air restrictor for 6 months !!"
What's your thoughts on an 'acceleration limit' ?
Regards John S

Don

28,378 posts

311 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
Wouldn't put it past 'em. My view on it is that it would be a law introduced on an envy basis rather than for any logical reason.

Although we do all know that *inappropriate* acceleration can lead to accidents.....generally if its appropriate to go at a particular speed its appropriate to get there as quickly as you can....

Don't think it'll ever happen. Although it may become impossible to buy cars with more than such and so a BHP number....

shadowninja

79,837 posts

309 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
fear! thats the main pleasure I get from driving performance cars... cos I tend to avoid excessive speed as my car attracts everyone's attention... if they took that away I might as well get a breeder mobile or scrabble wagon

CarZee

13,382 posts

294 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
plod can pull you over for piss-taking acceleration anyway if he likes.. 'specially if you get any wheelspin or look like you're out-accelerating someone else (racing!?)

Mr E

22,979 posts

286 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

Don said: Don't think it'll ever happen. Although it may become impossible to buy cars with more than such and so a BHP number....


And we all know how well that's worked in Japan. 280ps from a 3 litre twin turbo engine?

Them's strong horsies.....

John_S

Original Poster:

22 posts

304 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
Perhaps there should be a law in regards to the minimum
amount of acceleration a car should have ?
I know all the motorway crews have to think about minimum acceleration, when choosing their company cars.
Regards John S

moleamol

15,887 posts

290 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

CarZee said: plod can pull you over for piss-taking acceleration anyway if he likes.. 'specially if you get any wheelspin or look like you're out-accelerating someone else (racing!?)
I got pulled for accelerating in my car. It was a clear road with no turns etc etc. and I only did so to 40 (50mph road). He pulled me and said he 'could' do me for dangerous driving, I said ok, sorry and he told me where it would be 'more suitable' for me to accelerate and drive a tad faster

Byff

4,427 posts

288 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
IIRC, does the RAC and AA people recommend that the most fuel efficient way of driving is to reach your intended speed as quickly as possible.

Seems like a good excuse to me.

dazren

22,612 posts

288 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
Silly idea.

Let's have breeding limits for scrotes first.

DAZ

goodlife

1,852 posts

286 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
Following some numpty politics a few years back, all Jap bike manufacturers made a gentlemans agreement to limit UK bikes to 100bhp (or 125bhp - can't remember which).

Tuning companies made a packet at the time. Slowly the manufacturers 'forgot' the agreement and the 'horse race' started again.

BTW - Germans bikes are legally restricted to 100PS already.

If it's happening on bikes, surely cars will follow.

shadowninja

79,837 posts

309 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

Byff said: IIRC, does the RAC and AA people recommend that the most fuel efficient way of driving is to reach your intended speed as quickly as possible.

Seems like a good excuse to me.


to buy some Nos?

shadowninja

79,837 posts

309 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

dazren said: Silly idea.

Let's have breeding limits for scrotes first.

DAZ



"Think! Breeding kills!"?

granville

18,764 posts

288 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
Jesus Christ! I've just EXPLODED at this concept!!!

NNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH you bloody !!!!!

What next? Your arse limited to 2 dumps/day, even after a fiery uber madras?

Your hifi limited to 3dbs per watt metre, even as Lemmy crescendos during 'The Claw' on Orgasmastron?

Your contrbutions to PH restricted to sterile, monosyllabic Q&As..?

Oh no, this just could NOT be allowed to happen - EVER!!!

Bloody hell, my all too infrequent rubber burning (usually in summer) involves positively violent devulcanisation of me tread from standing start (deserted) moorland drag strips...Battle Star Galactica sling shot starts are the very essence of pistonicism and without that, you may as well ring up Palin right now and subscribe to the gonad crushing lentlism of the latest issue of T2000.

Shocking thought, truly terrifying.

daydreamer

1,409 posts

284 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

Byff said: IIRC, does the RAC and AA people recommend that the most fuel efficient way of driving is to reach your intended speed as quickly as possible.

Seems like a good excuse to me.
All good - although didn't they also say as quickly as possible while keeping under 3000rpm. Mind you, with all of the serious torque in lightweight motors owned by a number of contributors on here - may still be pretty interesting concept to stick rigidly to

hertsbiker

6,443 posts

298 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

CarZee said: plod can pull you over for piss-taking acceleration anyway if he likes.. 'specially if you get any wheelspin or look like you're out-accelerating someone else (racing!?)


Ah, the jealousy effect ! just 'cos their lousy cars can't do it, they have to get arsey. I got pulled for a very minor wheelspin. Pathetic of them, wasn't speeding either. They said it was "a bit cowboyish". I was wondering if that is what the charge would be in court. "M'lud, the defendant is charged with being a bit cowboyish".... FFS.

C

Byff

4,427 posts

288 months

Friday 10th January 2003
quotequote all

hertsbiker said: "M'lud, the defendant is charged with being a bit cowboyish".... FFS.



Lovely, spat my tea out laughing.

spnracing

1,558 posts

298 months

Friday 10th January 2003
quotequote all

hertsbiker said
I got pulled for a very minor wheelspin.



I always thought that the police would consider charges of driving without due care and attention if you spin the wheels - their view being that if you do that you are not in proper cpntrol of your vehicle on a public road.

So I never do this with a squad car behind me. Then again with a diesel automatic its not particular easy at all nowadays.

hertsbiker

6,443 posts

298 months

Friday 10th January 2003
quotequote all
I guess almost *anything* could be deemed "not in charge".. but that would be a bit silly. Imagine getting a ticket for not having BOTH hands on the wheel at all times. So every time you changed gear, you'd be technically "out of control". These days I would try very hard not to attract attention!
C

raceboy

13,841 posts

307 months

Friday 10th January 2003
quotequote all

mungo said:If that happened I'd give up on cars and buy one of those strap on helicopter things you can buy from gadget websites and travel everywhere in that!

Well it appears to be your lucky day, price seems a bit steep though And not sure about the 'promise notto use it bit'
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/030110/80/di7o9.html

woodster

122 posts

290 months

Friday 10th January 2003
quotequote all
I was pulled after 'violently accelerating' away from a roundabout onto a dual carrigeway and got 3 points for it. It was 6:45am on a clear road and I suspect plod was bored.
It was dark, he was hidden on a little slip road off the road. I was doing about about 5mph over the limit following (at a safe distance) a couple of other cars I'd caught up when he put the blues on.
He said that a combination of the two 'offenses' was sufficient for a fine. My first points they were too.

It was about 7 years ago and I was in my old 16v Clio.

Never really questioned whether I could have appealed, but I've always felt it was a bit harsh.