How big is that wing
Author
Discussion

cotty

Original Poster:

42,146 posts

311 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all
Spotted in the cars for sale section, check out the hill climb car.
www.pistonheads.com/ads/adverts.asp?s=29

Deester

1,607 posts

287 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all
Angle that thing the other way and I believe we have lift off.

anarchystorm

943 posts

283 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all
Just dont show the Nova/Corsa/Saxo boys, or they will try to put one on theirs soon. God, that would make em look worse than they already are.

GT5S_1985

703 posts

283 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all
That looks like one of the cars I saw prepared for Pike's Peak in Colorado. It at least won its class if not the whole event, so it must do something besides provide a picnic table for the crew... They need all the traction they can get going up that hill...

manek

2,978 posts

311 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all
...more likely the weight of the thing over the rear wheels that adds traction...

Psychobert

6,318 posts

283 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all

anarchystorm said: Just dont show the Nova/Corsa/Saxo boys, or they will try to put one on theirs soon. God, that would make em look worse than they already are.


Means we'd be able to see them a fair distance off and take avoiding action..

Would have thought something that size is going to create a lot of drag.. Guess it must do the job else they wouldn't have put it on..

joospeed

4,473 posts

305 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all

Psychobert said:

anarchystorm said: Just dont show the Nova/Corsa/Saxo boys, or they will try to put one on theirs soon. God, that would make em look worse than they already are.


Means we'd be able to see them a fair distance off and take avoiding action..

Would have thought something that size is going to create a lot of drag.. Guess it must do the job else they wouldn't have put it on..


speeds are very low on hillclimb / sprint generally and low speed traction all important. looks great to me, but I'm more technician than beautician

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all
"hello Tower, permission to join the stack for runway 3..."

GreenV8S

31,007 posts

311 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all
But it looks very strange to see that great big slab of (presumably) intercooler stuck out in the air like that. And why is the wing so far forward? Traditionally they are stuck as far back as possible (subject to regs) because it is easier to get downforce at the front than the back. But maybe it runs to some funny regs.

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all

GreenV8S said: But it looks very strange to see that great big slab of (presumably) intercooler stuck out in the air like that. And why is the wing so far forward? Traditionally they are stuck as far back as possible (subject to regs) because it is easier to get downforce at the front than the back. But maybe it runs to some funny regs.


Weight distribution...? If they put it any further back, it might fall over..!

GT5S_1985

703 posts

283 months

Wednesday 15th January 2003
quotequote all

joospeed said:
speeds are very low on hillclimb / sprint generally and low speed traction all important. looks great to me, but I'm more technician than beautician

Pike's Peak winning time in the last year listed on their website is 71+mph average... obviously less than that in the corners, but that speed is enough for a wing to help traction but not so high as to have the additional drag affect your top end.

Big wings help traction at the cost of topend, which I guess is why this car is being advertised as a hillclimber.