rule of thirds
Author
Discussion

UKBob

Original Poster:

16,277 posts

295 months

Sunday 14th May 2006
quotequote all
Found a great link on the rule of thirds with some fantastic photo samples
www.morguefile.com/archive/classroom.php?lesson=1

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Sunday 14th May 2006
quotequote all
rule of thirds.... less than one third of my photos will be any good?

fergusd

1,251 posts

300 months

Sunday 14th May 2006
quotequote all
Rules, schmools . . . if taking good pics was a mathematical equation then you'd be sh1t out of luck and computers would yet again rule your world . . .

thankfully that's not the case . . .

any pics from the weekend ?

Fd

UKBob

Original Poster:

16,277 posts

295 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
rule of thirds.... less than one third of my photos will be any good?
Its people like you who give people like me inspiration

fergusd said:
Rules, schmools . . . if taking good pics was a mathematical equation then you'd be sh1t out of luck and computers would yet again rule your world . . .

thankfully that's not the case . . .

any pics from the weekend ?

Fd
Ahh yes. But, for a fleeting moment, envisage yourself as photographer extraordinaire, fergus the fantastic, and all your images are crackalackin! As I see it, the rule of thirds is the icing on the cake in the portfolios which shine for an infinite number of other reasons. Theres something to it, im sure.

No exciting pics to show. Ive been reading, practising, and submitted my oldies to a stock library. I manged a few boring corporate style retakes, nothing exciting, nothing you havnt seen before. And the crappy £50 tripod I bought is working well

fergusd

1,251 posts

300 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
Why is complying with percieved rules the icing on the cake ?

Don't you think it all becomes very tedious . . . all this complying with rules ?

Fd

UKBob

Original Poster:

16,277 posts

295 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
fergusd said:
Why is complying with percieved rules the icing on the cake ?

Don't you think it all becomes very tedious . . . all this complying with rules ?

Fd
For starters, they are not 'rules'. You wont get pulled over, given a ticket, or sent directly to jail without passing GO if you fail to obey them.

As I see it, photos dont need to comply with rules at all. There are billions of great photos which testify this. Besides, rules were made to be broken.

Thats not to say that there are no instances of the principle of thirds which work especially well due to their composition.

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
Is it not the case that rather than conciously and deliberately trying to follow the "rules", photographs which do will generally work better than those that don't?

In the article, the author appears to sell stock images, and mentions that her most successful ones are those that follow the rule of thirds.

I haven't read the whole thing but scrolling down she appears to start going on about the "divine proportion" malarky and it felt too much like I was reading the DaVinci code again!

UKBob

Original Poster:

16,277 posts

295 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
I haven't read the whole thing but scrolling down she appears to start going on about the "divine proportion" malarky and it felt too much like I was reading the DaVinci code again!

EmmaP

11,758 posts

269 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
The rule of thirds is about balance and proportion. Rules can be broken to good effect.

Symmetry:




Extreme imbalances of scale work too. This is about the best I could find upon a brief search.

V6GTO

11,579 posts

272 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
I agree...it's just a guide.

Rule of thirds used...



...and ignored...



Martin.

doodah

192 posts

246 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
martin your noble is a third from top to bottom.

mmc.