Two Networks?
Author
Discussion

PetrolTed

Original Poster:

34,468 posts

333 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
Question for the network experts.

Can I plug a PC into a network (#1) and then create my own wireless network (#2) off that PC which accesses the internet via network #1?

Mikey G

4,898 posts

270 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
I'm sure most wireless network cards can now work 'AD-Hoc' which means they can talk to each other without the need for a wireless access point or router. So i think yes is the answer

>> Edited by Mikey G on Wednesday 17th May 20:50

BliarOut

72,863 posts

269 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
Are you thinking of using "internet connection sharing" on MS boxes?

A bum basic wireless router would be more reliable but ICS should work.

PetrolTed

Original Poster:

34,468 posts

333 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
That's my question really. I'll plug into a network (not ADSL), and want to route from the other PCs.

Basically it's for our Motor Show stand. I can plug a PC into the exhibition centre's network (1 cost), but would rather then have my own wireless net rather than have to buy another 2 connections.

agent006

12,058 posts

294 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
Can you not just plug a wireless access point into the network, and access through that?

Mikey G

4,898 posts

270 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
Found a diagram for what i was on about...

http://compnetworking.about.com/od/ho

andoverben

430 posts

270 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
Pistonheads is at the motorshow!!!! When did this happen, how exciting I didn't know...


Or has it being discussed at length and I didn't notice?

BliarOut

72,863 posts

269 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
You little beauty...

www.netgear.co.uk/extra/h_wireless_travel_router_wgr101.php?type=h

Or

www.netgear.co.uk/pdfs/WGR101.pdf

That could do exactly what you want. The only problem is if they are a bit cute and set it up to intentionally stop something like that working. It's got NAT etc so you would only need the one IP address.

mattley

3,039 posts

252 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
PetrolTed said:
Question for the network experts.

Can I plug a PC into a network (#1) and then create my own wireless network (#2) off that PC which accesses the internet via network #1?


PC with Wired network card to net #1

Wireless card for net #2, and ICS should do it.



PetrolTed

Original Poster:

34,468 posts

333 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
agent006 said:
Can you not just plug a wireless access point into the network, and access through that?


That sounds like a better solution. Is that feasible then?

I've got a Linksys jobbie here. Could I use that?

PetrolTed

Original Poster:

34,468 posts

333 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
andoverben said:
Pistonheads is at the motorshow!!!! When did this happen, how exciting I didn't know...


Or has it being discussed at length and I didn't notice?


Yep

www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=13240

BliarOut

72,863 posts

269 months

Wednesday 17th May 2006
quotequote all
PetrolTed said:
agent006 said:
Can you not just plug a wireless access point into the network, and access through that?


That sounds like a better solution. Is that feasible then?

I've got a Linksys jobbie here. Could I use that?


It'll need NAT like the Netgear jobbie ^ (so you only need to grab one IP address) which I doubt a straight AP will provide. What's the model of the Linksys?

ATG

23,816 posts

302 months

Thursday 18th May 2006
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
You little beauty...

www.netgear.co.uk/extra/h_wireless_travel_router_wgr101.php?type=h

Or

www.netgear.co.uk/pdfs/WGR101.pdf

That could do exactly what you want. The only problem is if they are a bit cute and set it up to intentionally stop something like that working. It's got NAT etc so you would only need the one IP address.
Network doughnut here. What cuteness could they employ? If I've got the right end of the stick, home-user type routers by default use NAT so that the outside world only sees a single IP address. The router replaces internal IP addresses with its own on out-bound packets and, by remebering who requested what, reverses this process on in-bound packets. Is that right? If so, how could ExCel detect that NATing was taking place?

mattley

3,039 posts

252 months

Thursday 18th May 2006
quotequote all
ATG said:
If so, how could ExCel detect that NATing was taking place?


MAC address checks, not difficult if they really want to, but I'll bet they don't.

TheExcession

11,669 posts

280 months

Thursday 18th May 2006
quotequote all
mattley said:
ATG said:
If so, how could ExCel detect that NATing was taking place?


MAC address checks, not difficult if they really want to, but I'll bet they don't.

edant mode:
The MAC Address of any clients 'disappears' once you cross the router... only the Client IP Addresses might be visible in certain protocols, but again all out bound traffic assumes the IP Address of the Router.

The checks are actually made using heuristics of the number of TCP/IP sessions that are opened and sometimes UDP is monitored too - usually DNS.

Generally by monitoring these parameters you can deduce how many clients are behind the router, but as you said, they've probably got better things to be doing.

:/pedant mode:

meeja

8,290 posts

278 months

Thursday 18th May 2006
quotequote all
mattley said:
ATG said:
If so, how could ExCel detect that NATing was taking place?


MAC address checks, not difficult if they really want to, but I'll bet they don't.


You'd be suprised.

Having facilitated events at ExCel, internet access is one thing that they are pretty hot on (It's a licence to print money at the end of the day)

We used a single connection for one of our events, and then used a router to give us enough internet connections (Wired solution rather than wireless)

Worked a treat.

neil_cardiff

17,113 posts

294 months

Thursday 18th May 2006
quotequote all
PetrolTed said:
agent006 said:
Can you not just plug a wireless access point into the network, and access through that?


That sounds like a better solution. Is that feasible then?

I've got a Linksys jobbie here. Could I use that?


Ted,

This is what I do at the NEC with my firms stand - they supply a CAT5 cable (literally) and a dynamic IP, which you can then do what you like with.

Most Wireless routers can handle it, but you'd be better off with a firewalled router - just in case. Obviously then you can hang whatever you like off it as the router will be dishing out IP addresses DHCP stylee...

HTH

Neil

Edited to add they will have a subnet that you can't use, but I'm sure unless your name is Ford they won't be getting Kung Fuey on your ass if you hang a couple of machines off the connection. If you do use wireless though, make sure you you use the best encryption method, because you WILL have some tt trying to break it - its a public show and geeks will try anything and everything to see what they can get too...

>> Edited by neil_cardiff on Thursday 18th May 08:58

_deejay_

5,057 posts

284 months

Thursday 18th May 2006
quotequote all
TheExcession said:
mattley said:
ATG said:
If so, how could ExCel detect that NATing was taking place?


MAC address checks, not difficult if they really want to, but I'll bet they don't.

edant mode:
The MAC Address of any clients 'disappears' once you cross the router... only the Client IP Addresses might be visible in certain protocols, but again all out bound traffic assumes the IP Address of the Router.

The checks are actually made using heuristics of the number of TCP/IP sessions that are opened and sometimes UDP is monitored too - usually DNS.

Generally by monitoring these parameters you can deduce how many clients are behind the router, but as you said, they've probably got better things to be doing.

:/pedant mode:


Not sure how monitoring UDP is going to help you (if it's just DNS as you say, then why not install a DNS caching server on the machine that is supposed to be accessing the Internet)

TCP sessions? In that case just tunnel out of the place to a known point on the Internet.
1 TCP connection for as many sessions as you like.

D

neil_cardiff

17,113 posts

294 months

Thursday 18th May 2006
quotequote all
_deejay_ said:
TheExcession said:
mattley said:
ATG said:
If so, how could ExCel detect that NATing was taking place?


MAC address checks, not difficult if they really want to, but I'll bet they don't.

edant mode:
The MAC Address of any clients 'disappears' once you cross the router... only the Client IP Addresses might be visible in certain protocols, but again all out bound traffic assumes the IP Address of the Router.

The checks are actually made using heuristics of the number of TCP/IP sessions that are opened and sometimes UDP is monitored too - usually DNS.

Generally by monitoring these parameters you can deduce how many clients are behind the router, but as you said, they've probably got better things to be doing.

:/pedant mode:


Not sure how monitoring UDP is going to help you (if it's just DNS as you say, then why not install a DNS caching server on the machine that is supposed to be accessing the Internet)

TCP sessions? In that case just tunnel out of the place to a known point on the Internet.
1 TCP connection for as many sessions as you like.

D


To be honest chaps, if they are monitoring traffic, they will leave most clients alone - they'll have a HUUUUGEEE connection (probably a 100Mb) and they really won't give a toss if someone is adding a couple of extra clients on.

What they do get funny about is when servers appear and they get most unhappy then

BliarOut

72,863 posts

269 months

Thursday 18th May 2006
quotequote all
neil_cardiff said:
_deejay_ said:
TheExcession said:
mattley said:
ATG said:
If so, how could ExCel detect that NATing was taking place?


MAC address checks, not difficult if they really want to, but I'll bet they don't.

edant mode:
The MAC Address of any clients 'disappears' once you cross the router... only the Client IP Addresses might be visible in certain protocols, but again all out bound traffic assumes the IP Address of the Router.

The checks are actually made using heuristics of the number of TCP/IP sessions that are opened and sometimes UDP is monitored too - usually DNS.

Generally by monitoring these parameters you can deduce how many clients are behind the router, but as you said, they've probably got better things to be doing.

:/pedant mode:


Not sure how monitoring UDP is going to help you (if it's just DNS as you say, then why not install a DNS caching server on the machine that is supposed to be accessing the Internet)

TCP sessions? In that case just tunnel out of the place to a known point on the Internet.
1 TCP connection for as many sessions as you like.

D


To be honest chaps, if they are monitoring traffic, they will leave most clients alone - they'll have a HUUUUGEEE connection (probably a 100Mb) and they really won't give a toss if someone is adding a couple of extra clients on.

What they do get funny about is when servers appear and they get most unhappy then
Point about the Linksys WAP was that if it's a straight AP then it won't do NAT and they're probably not going to give IP's away for free when it's a revenue stream. Any NAT type solution will probably work but I wouldn't necessarily want to rely on an MS ICS if time or reliability was important.