Hyper quick pc needed
Author
Discussion

shadytree

Original Poster:

8,291 posts

279 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
My work PC is dying under the stress

A lot of my applications use Java and the refresh time is starting to suffer.

What's the quickest chip and video card you can get today ?

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

270 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
Twin AMD dual core's probably for Java apps. Or like me, more than one PC.

roadsweeper

3,789 posts

304 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
Information on amazing dual-core value (4.1 GHz dual-core at £79.95 that blows away most of Intel and AMD's top-end offerings) at Tom's Hardware.

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

270 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
roadsweeper said:
Information on amazing dual-core value (4.1 GHz dual-core at £79.95 that blows away most of Intel and AMD's top-end offerings) at Tom's Hardware.

Run some overclocked system as the PC I earn my living on? I'll pass on that thanks.

Cheap speed for home though.

Bodo

12,609 posts

296 months

shadytree

Original Poster:

8,291 posts

279 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
Remember firm PC, so cost not a problem. Just need something lightning fast that I won't outgrow in 12 months

BliarOut

72,863 posts

269 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
shadytree said:
Remember firm PC, so cost not a problem. Just need something lightning fast that I won't outgrow in 12 months
You'll outgrow most hardware in twelve months if your software keeps getting updated.

I always find java apps sluggish but have never bothered to find out why. I would have said it's best to work out which components are most likely to bottleneck a system in a java app first and then overspec those parts.

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

270 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
I always find java apps sluggish but have never bothered to find out why. I would have said it's best to work out which components are most likely to bottleneck a system in a java app first and then overspec those parts.

Almost always it's the memory bandwidth that slows it. Object oriented programming. Got to hate it...

SlidingSideways

1,345 posts

262 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
Bodo said:


If only I could convince my boss.......

BliarOut

72,863 posts

269 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
ThatPhilBrettGuy said:
BliarOut said:
I always find java apps sluggish but have never bothered to find out why. I would have said it's best to work out which components are most likely to bottleneck a system in a java app first and then overspec those parts.

Almost always it's the memory bandwidth that slows it. Object oriented programming. Got to hate it...
See, a man who knows

So for Shady's work machine good memory speed is more important than outright CPU cycles and graphics performance?

xiphias

5,889 posts

257 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
New apples use ddr2 667 ram! Also, the new AM2 AMD socket supports DDR2 ram as well. That should solve your memory issues. Which OS are you after?

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

270 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
So for Shady's work machine good memory speed is more important than outright CPU cycles and graphics performance?

Probably yes. So I'd probably look from something like this :- http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/uk/inte

Stuff in 2 dual core AMD's and make sure it has 2GB of memory per processor and you're laughing. Type 'numa memory' into google and read read read.

Basically some AMD chipsets support each processor having their own memory. Instant doubling of memory performance, which for most business apps is the killer number.

At my old work we ran our trade processing app on a 4 processor, dual core, hyperthreaded 3.6Ghz Intel box (16 processors showing in Task Manager, nice) with 16GB RAM. Got about 29,000 transactions per second out of it.

Same I/O system on a 4 processor, dual core AMD box @ 2.2Ghz with 2GB per processor node (seem NUMA stuff).... 81,000 transactions per second.

flossythepig

4,143 posts

273 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
shadytree said:
My work PC is dying under the stress
A lot of my applications use Java and the refresh time is starting to suffer.
What's the quickest chip and video card you can get today ?


What is the spec of your current system? What operating system, etc? Does the java use Swing?

Just been talking to our technical architect and he suggested reloading the operating system. If it's XP it can get clogged up.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
Whats your budget?

Should be able to relive you of a few quid, no worries

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
xiphias said:
New apples use ddr2 667 ram! Also, the new AM2 AMD socket supports DDR2 ram as well. That should solve your memory issues. Which OS are you after?


I can supply DDR2 1066...

cyberface

12,214 posts

287 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
ThatPhilBrettGuy said:
BliarOut said:
I always find java apps sluggish but have never bothered to find out why. I would have said it's best to work out which components are most likely to bottleneck a system in a java app first and then overspec those parts.

Almost always it's the memory bandwidth that slows it. Object oriented programming. Got to hate it...

yup - actually with nasty branchy bytecode / interpreted languages, memory latency is as big an issue as bandwidth.

My Mac G5 Quad has monster memory bandwidth, but high latency due to the northbridge design. For loads of Java I'd choose an Opteron, the integrated memory controllers ensure *very* low latency.

As to that overclocked Pentium D, well it's bloody impressive but nearly 500 W power consumption under heavy load with only 2 cores makes my watercooled G5 Quad look like a Palm Pilot. That's crazy stuff for a computer, all mine are on 24/7 and a half kilowatt PC would not only cost a fair amount of electricity but heat the office up somewhat.....

shadytree

Original Poster:

8,291 posts

279 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Whats your budget?

Should be able to relive you of a few quid, no worries


plenty enough

agent006

12,058 posts

294 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/

We run 50+ instances of 2003 server on our G3s, so should be fine for some dick waving whilst running a java app.

Zad

13,020 posts

266 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
We need to know more.

Is your work PC a server or workstation?
What cpu (type, speed) and memory does it have?
What hard drive size / speed does it have?
What OS and applications are you using?
Does it need to communicate over the network in order to perform your applications?

If you have 256MB memory then no amount of cpu and graphics card changing will speed it up.

As usual with PH, the replies so far have addressed individuals' own problems rather than yours. That's not meant in a nasty way, but it does seem to happen a lot.

My initial guess is that 50 quids worth of extra bog standard memory will improve it no end, with no need for quad dual core opterons and fancy memory.

dilbert

7,741 posts

261 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
FWIW......

I know how you can guarantee the performance you need. Theres no point in explaining though, because I know you'll like the answer as little as me suggesting that you rewrite it in a different language.



Good luck with your Java graphics app (if that's not a contradiction)!