Uncanny Audis - "ghost runners"
Uncanny Audis - "ghost runners"
Author
Discussion

nel

Original Poster:

4,825 posts

263 months

Sunday 18th June 2006
quotequote all
Just got home after 3 days of beer, sun and petrolhead heaven. So many beautiful cars to look at and perfect weather.

But those Audis are just uncanny! Every other car makes the noises you're used to hearing - pops, bangs and flames on the over-run, then a visceral howl of power as they leave the corner. In some cases the noise was not far short of physical assault, e.g. the Corvettes. Then in comes an Audi Tdi, whispering into the corner and barely making any noise as it accelerates away - if there was a petrol driven car in the vicinty then you couldn't hear the Audi at all, making them seem electric driven.

Also impressed by how well set-up they are. OK, so they're equipped with particle filters, but still to produce no visible smoke at all from a diesel engine churning out 650 bhp and 1,100 Nm of torque. One day we'll all end up with sportscars running diesels or hybrids - with this win they have shown the way forward. Now if only they could make diesel that when burnt smelt like Castrol R!

Hope you all make it back OK without meeting the rozzers. Saw plenty of PHers cars around a jag with liiony's (sp?) name on, Nervy getting out of his GT3 to go for dinner at Arnage last night. Many thanks to the kind TVR driver who asked if I was OK when he passed my porker at a standstill near the entrance to Houx Annexe - yes I was lost but had just worked out where to go!

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

281 months

Sunday 18th June 2006
quotequote all
nel said:

One day we'll all end up with sportscars running diesels or hybrids


That is a horrible thought.

nel said:

with this win they have shown the way forward.


How have they shown the way forward? Next year they should let the turbo petrol cars have the near 2 litre displacement difference, the bigger air restrictors, the bigger fuel filler nozzle size etc, etc, the diesel cars would be nowhere.

xiphias

5,889 posts

249 months

Sunday 18th June 2006
quotequote all
Nowt wrong with a derv imo. They just need to get them to rev higher. With a semi-auto and lots of close packed gears, I expect you could make them go pretty quick.

Mikey G

4,849 posts

262 months

Sunday 18th June 2006
quotequote all
Many people think diesel is going to take over motor racing. I think some people are missing the point with regards to endurance racing. Diesels have there place in racing and they are not going to take over all sorts of championships. Performance on track was not much different between the Audi's and Pescarolos (sp?) but the Audis were able to stay out much longer between pitstops.

I find it great that the technology of diesel has advanced so much, but for a performance car petrol will always win as the costs to get a diesel to this standard is rather a lot!

nel

Original Poster:

4,825 posts

263 months

Sunday 18th June 2006
quotequote all
Mikey G said:
I find it great that the technology of diesel has advanced so much, but for a performance car petrol will always win as the costs to get a diesel to this standard is rather a lot!


Yes but that's R&D, something traditionally associated with Le Mans, the classic endurance race. One day the first hydrogen fuel cell racer will probably compete here!

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

281 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
Mikey G said:
Many people think diesel is going to take over motor racing. I think some people are missing the point with regards to endurance racing. Diesels have there place in racing and they are not going to take over all sorts of championships. Performance on track was not much different between the Audi's and Pescarolos (sp?) but the Audis were able to stay out much longer between pitstops.

I find it great that the technology of diesel has advanced so much, but for a performance car petrol will always win as the costs to get a diesel to this standard is rather a lot!


The regs are biased towards the Diesels though, build a petrol car to the same regs and it'd be so much faster that it wouldn't matter about fuel stops. Compare the R10 to the R8 - the R8 ran smaller restrictors, had to refuel with smaller fuel lines, was 1.9 L smaller and was limited by the regs to 1.6 bar of boost compared with the R10 which was running 2.9 Bar!

nel

Original Poster:

4,825 posts

263 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:
The regs are biased towards the Diesels though, build a petrol car to the same regs and it'd be so much faster that it wouldn't matter about fuel stops. Compare the R10 to the R8 - the R8 ran smaller restrictors, had to refuel with smaller fuel lines, was 1.9 L smaller and was limited by the regs to 1.6 bar of boost compared with the R10 which was running 2.9 Bar!


Fair comment, though it is always hard to set the parity between two different engine types. The closeness of the result shows that they got it about right when they set the Le Mans spec. for the diesels. Similar to the arguments about how to classify the capacity of a wankel engine, hence all the complaints in the bike racing a few years ago that the rotary Nortons had an unfair advantage.

But to encourage the use of such developments it has to be made possible for them to win - if the same capacity regs for the petrol engines had been applied to the chip fat burners then no one would have bothered making a racing diesel coz they wouldn't have had a hope. Long term, encouraging such R&D can only be a good thing for what we get in our road cars.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

281 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
I agree with that , but think that the bare facts still show the fuel would not be the choice of the engineers when asked to build the fastest car they could if the regs were equal.

Fair play to Audi but I'm dreading the whole "le mans proved diesel is better than petrol" marketting rubbish that will completely avoid the fact that the regs are so much more free for the R10.

zaktoo

1,401 posts

262 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
Let's not lose sight of the fact that it was basically an uncontested win. Their only real competition was Pescarolo.

adom

527 posts

261 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
For me one of the great attractions pf Le Mans is the noise and glowing brake discs - I find these silent diesels all very depressing. Not the 'way forward' in my book.

anonymous-user

76 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
what are the rev limits? i presume any low rev limit will always favour diesels.

Podie

46,647 posts

297 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
Watched a fiar bit of the race on MotorsTV... those Audi's sounded a bit clattery from inside!

nel

Original Poster:

4,825 posts

263 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
adom said:
For me one of the great attractions pf Le Mans is the noise and glowing brake discs - I find these silent diesels all very depressing. Not the 'way forward' in my book.


Yeah I agree, though I can't help but be admirative of the engineering work that's gone into making racing diesel engines. However, planned changes to the regulations for next year include the driver air-con (cockpit temperatures to respect) and noise levels, so the nannying just goes on. With every passing year you can expect the cars to get less raucous, which does seem a pity.

tom7

61 posts

276 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
According to the briefing from Alan McNish, the Audi's were running 5 speed box's changing up at 4500rpm
This whole diesel thing is bad news generally as Peugeot will be there next year with their diesel, Honda maybe the year after.
Racing cars are supposed to be LOUD and present an assault to the senses at all levels, otherwise we all will be reduced to the 24hour Scalextric marathon.

srebbe64

13,021 posts

259 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
The Audi diesel was awesome. Seems to me that all the energy was used in propelling the car rather than noise and heat. That said, you can't beat the noise of the petrols, particularly the Corvettes.

xiphias

5,889 posts

249 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
If the local bad boys round here can make their 1.2novas sound like louder than most sports cars, I'm sure they can do something with the diesels. Our clio diesel used to make an almost sporty growl at 4k.

corozin

2,680 posts

293 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
Aside from the "whooshing grumble" of the Deisel engines, if you listened a bit closer you could hear a gentle "slap, slap" noise in the background. I believe it was the sound of French national pride being slapped like a bitch...

20vt_mk2dub

533 posts

249 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
They sounded very eery and I missed the pop-pop-pop-bang-bang-BANG of the R8 going down the pitlane....

nel

Original Poster:

4,825 posts

263 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
corozin said:
Aside from the "whooshing grumble" of the Deisel engines, if you listened a bit closer you could hear a gentle "slap, slap" noise in the background. I believe it was the sound of French national pride being slapped like a bitch...


Yes, the frogs might be a bit sensitive at the moment with all the french drivers not considered good enough for F1, so they were no doubt hoping that Henri's Pescarolo team would do the business. Problem is that the french love their diseasels so much (65% of private car buyers plump for one) that, as noted above, they'll probably be here with their own chip fat burners next year.

20vt_mk2dub

533 posts

249 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Does anyone else think they seem to have an unfair advantage over others though?

Restrictions would go amiss!

Just hope diesels dont take over - a le man full of diesels would be very quiet and boring for 24hrs.