Dgital file. Tracking changes
Discussion
Can any of you more computer literate people out there be able to help me. I have been taking digital clinical photographs for many years now and a point has come up from a collegue regarding tampering with the images. Is it possible to have an image (as a jpeg) where any changes are recorded in a way that cannot be tampered with? It would be nice to prove, if required that the image has not been doctored in anyway. This would also need to be the case with scanned images.
Hi Rex,
The only thing I've seen which does this is Canon's Digital Verification Kit. I've not however heard of anything that can be used to verify existing images taken on a different camera, or scanned in.
The only thing I've seen which does this is Canon's Digital Verification Kit. I've not however heard of anything that can be used to verify existing images taken on a different camera, or scanned in.
rex said:
size13 said:
When you say clinical, in what way do you mean?
medical, dental etc..?
medical, dental etc..?
Edited by size13 on Friday 23 June 10:43
Dental
Like said, RAW is almost there, but you can't get a raw image from all the digital hardware.
You could have a system that stores the changes seperately (like Rawshooter or Picassa) and they are linked to some kind of authentication. Don't know if DICOM covers anything relevant, http://medical.nema.org/
Edited by size13 on Friday 23 June 15:35
you could just run an md5 checksum over the image when you take it then store that checksum value somewhere safe or public . . . that way if there's any debate as to whether the image someone has is the same as the one you took . . . just compare the md5 checksum . . .
I'm sure that's not what you're trying to do tho' . . .
Fd
I'm sure that's not what you're trying to do tho' . . .
Fd
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





