Portrait Lens - Nikon D70
Discussion
Hi,
In preparation of the arrival of knee-high I've decided I want to purchase a "portrait" lens. You know for those one in a million shots of how gorgeous mother and baby are.
Does anyone have any recommendations? I'm thinking Prime to give the best low/natural light response. Clearest image etc. Given the 1.6(?) cropping factor - what would be the best focal length(?). A 50mm?
I've seen (I think) a Nikon 50mm 1.4 prime lens. for not a great deal of money. What do people think of those?
Any advice/opinions/experience welcomed!
Thanks,
Phil.
In preparation of the arrival of knee-high I've decided I want to purchase a "portrait" lens. You know for those one in a million shots of how gorgeous mother and baby are.
Does anyone have any recommendations? I'm thinking Prime to give the best low/natural light response. Clearest image etc. Given the 1.6(?) cropping factor - what would be the best focal length(?). A 50mm?
I've seen (I think) a Nikon 50mm 1.4 prime lens. for not a great deal of money. What do people think of those?
Any advice/opinions/experience welcomed!
Thanks,
Phil.
Phil, you probably mean the Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 - it's about £60, and in terms of bang for buck you wont get much better. It's pretty sharp, and pretty fast.
the f/1.4 is a bit more cash.
I've got the f/1.8, before I sold my kidney to buy my 28-70 it was probably the most reliable lens I had, now it seems insane to use a £60 lens in favour of a £1260 one! Which is fine because it's good, but not that good.
the f/1.4 is a bit more cash.
I've got the f/1.8, before I sold my kidney to buy my 28-70 it was probably the most reliable lens I had, now it seems insane to use a £60 lens in favour of a £1260 one! Which is fine because it's good, but not that good.
Edited by _dobbo_ on Saturday 16th September 01:19
Thanks guys. I'm not sure about the f/1.8 - it could well have been the one I'm thinking of.
My budget is around £150 for the lens - so if it's worth the extra, maybe I should go for a 1.4? (definitely not £1260 though!!
)
Do I take it that you'd pretty much say that these lens are the best (quality + value for money) option?
Thanks again,
Phil.
My budget is around £150 for the lens - so if it's worth the extra, maybe I should go for a 1.4? (definitely not £1260 though!!
) Do I take it that you'd pretty much say that these lens are the best (quality + value for money) option?
Thanks again,
Phil.
I had the same decision and decided to go for a Nikon 60mm f2.8 micro.
Good for portrait work (about 100mm inc. crop) and also great for macro stuff too. Its got a handy setting on the AF that stops it hunting all the way through the focus field if you are not using it for macro stuff.
About £200 odd I think, but sigma do the equiv. for less.
www.sigma-imaging-uk.com/lenses/macro/70mm.htm
www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=5&productNr=1987#
Good for portrait work (about 100mm inc. crop) and also great for macro stuff too. Its got a handy setting on the AF that stops it hunting all the way through the focus field if you are not using it for macro stuff.
About £200 odd I think, but sigma do the equiv. for less.
www.sigma-imaging-uk.com/lenses/macro/70mm.htm
www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=5&productNr=1987#
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


