FAX YOUR MP TODAY
Author
Discussion

s6blr

Original Poster:

1,002 posts

313 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
FYI: our lovely MP's are Tuesday about to RUIN our rural roads for fun....and
create yet another useless government agency.

I never get involved in this stuff but I'll be d*mned if I'm paying for it,
nor am I willing to get a ban on rural roads.

Go to the following URL to let them have it. I've copied my letter to my local
MP below...you just need your postcode ! Or create your own ;>

www.faxyourmp.com/index.php3

I am writing you regarding the Tuesday debate in Parliament on the Railways
and Transport Safety Bill.

if you are unfamiliar with these amendments please refer to this webpage link
www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmbills/040/amend/30306m03.htm. The amendment is in Section NC21.

In a nutshell the amendment proposes to impose blanket speed limits on all roads based upon a very broad set of criteria which appear to take no account of local road and traffic conditions. I am referring particularly to the rural and single carriageway references.

As I'm sure you are aware, local councils already have the power to impose speed limits on sections of road where they deem it to be necessary.

Whilst I do not have a problem with speed limits being imposed where there are good safety reasons for doing so, this kind of knee-jerk reaction is an unnecessary and draconian measure.

It also strikes me that this amendment has been 'tacked' onto the end of a bill to which it has only a limited relation (from the title it is a Railways bill, not a Roads one), purely so that it can be passed through Parliament without the level of debate appropriate to such a wide ranging and draconian measure.

There's several hidden laws being passed inside of this Bill.

It creates a Rural Roads Agency, and establishes a nationwide 40 Mph speed
limit on these rural roads.

My objections are several to this item:

1: It was tried, and FAILED in Parliament before, to create a Rural Roads
Agency, this is the job of (2) and we don't need yet another bill to validate
this.

2: Our local councils are already paid to take care of rural roads, we can not
afford another road agency and the subsequent buracracy it will become.

3: Rural roads have less than .05 % of all road incidents. Less that 1 % of
that .05 %, according to the ABD are speed related. Thus, with police
overtaxed to a non amusing level for all involved, the notion of speed
restrictions is the Highway Code law. Let those roads be as they are.

Please DO NOT allow these hidden parts of the bill to go forward. Recall that
Hillingdon is already raising our poll tax # 414 this year, and that we've
paid our road use tax.

Please get this sorted and removed, I suspect your peers may well not be aware
of these last minute additions.

Kind Regards,

s6blr

Original Poster:

1,002 posts

313 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
****if you can't get through on the above website, try these****

Constituency Locata: www.mojuk.org.uk/eddie/fax1.html

or
Fax your MP www.locata.co.uk/commons/
or
Alphabetical List of Members of Parliament (contains email addresses)
www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/alms.htm

mannginger

10,302 posts

288 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
My MP is none other than Tim Collins, Shadow Transport Minister - needless to say I have sent him a rather strong worded e-mail, to which I await his reply with interest.

If he votes for this bill he has lost my vote, I just hope the UK Independance party have a candidate in my area.

bob the planner

4,695 posts

300 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
The link to www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmbills/040/amend/30306m03.htm. does not seem to work. Can What was the title of the bill, perhaps Google will find it for me.

Bob

mannginger

10,302 posts

288 months

Monday 17th March 2003
quotequote all



Please get this sorted and removed,




lol S6blr - looks like you got a mention!!

My constituent, who is concerned about the rural roads agency, claims that rural roads have less than 0.5 per cent. of all road incidents and less than 1 per cent. of the 0.5 per cent. are speed-related. With reference to the new clause, he says, in typically robust Essex person fashion, ''Get this sorted and removed.''

Taken from here: www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200203/cmstand/d/st030311/pm/30311s07.htm


>> Edited by mannginger on Monday 17th March 10:19