Specs.......
Author
Discussion

Jon Ison

Original Poster:

1,304 posts

263 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all

Touching Cloth

11,706 posts

269 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
"The camera's manufacturers - Speed Check Services (SCS) - confirmed that drivers could escape prosecution by lane-hopping but discouraged it on 'safety' grounds."


LOL, interesting reading. thumbup

monkeyhanger

9,267 posts

272 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
Touching Cloth said:
"The camera's manufacturers - Speed Check Services (SCS) - confirmed that drivers could escape prosecution by lane-hopping but discouraged it on 'safety' grounds."



Should have gone to SPECS-savers

busta

4,504 posts

263 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
Might even help to get people out of the middle lane.

But hang on, changing lanes is dangerous? Maybe they should stay in the middle then.

rhyds

95 posts

247 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
[redacted]

wrightyrs

446 posts

249 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
Is there anyone in the Pistonhead ranks who knows anymore about SPECS systems along the lines of this article?

As they say information is power!!!

cptsideways

13,887 posts

282 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
Perhaps they should be set to fine people who never change lanes!

Gixer

4,463 posts

278 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all

Jon Ison

Original Poster:

1,304 posts

263 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
I did start with an apology, It as also been moved here from Gassin, never read this as a rule, again apologies.

jasandjules

72,627 posts

259 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
Oh, so THAT is why the MLMs exist. 60mph in the middle lane = No fines from Specs...