DotNetNuke
Author
Discussion

judas

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

289 months

Wednesday 18th October 2006
quotequote all
Anyone used/using this? Any good? Got a big corporate intranet & website with *very* tight deadlines coming upand this looks like it may do most of the things they want.

judas

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

289 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Anyone? No one? I'll take that as a no then...

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

289 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Yes. It is good, especially version 4 with inline editting. What do you want to know?

judas

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

289 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:
Yes. It is good, especially version 4 with inline editting. What do you want to know?

Just needed to know if it's any good or not - not got much time to research stuff before making a decision. What I've seen so far looks impressive but whatever CMS we choose it's going to need some serious customisation to meet the client's needs, not least of which is being able to publish content and documents from a secure intranet directly to a website on another server.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Not as slick as Joomla, got some nice features but isnt coded overly effeciently, needs some meat behind it...

judas

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

289 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Joomla looks interesting. Only problems is the client has hinted very heavily that it needs to be a MS based solution (ie, .net/MS SQL Server architecture) as that's what their sysadmin is 'comfortable' with rolleyes So that puts some serious constraints on what building blocks we can use once you take the budget into account.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

289 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Not sure if the budget would stretch to this: www.sitefinity.com/ supposed to be good.

For a free point to start from with source code available (unfortunately in vb.net rather than c#) dnn is pretty decent. The url in my profile is a dnn site.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Ah well, if they're already in the MS way then throwing iron at a problem isnt going to be a new concept...

judas

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

289 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:
Not sure if the budget would stretch to this: www.sitefinity.com/ supposed to be good.

For a free point to start from with source code available (unfortunately in vb.net rather than c#) dnn is pretty decent. The url in my profile is a dnn site.

Nice, but way too expensive. Looking at open source for a reason

We also looked into plone before we knew about the MS requirements. But given that it's written in Python it's ruled itself out as we don't have the capability to do the customisation in the timeframe (*throws away Python for Dummies* hehe)

rich1231

17,340 posts

290 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Not as slick as Joomla, got some nice features but isnt coded overly effeciently, needs some meat behind it...


Was it Mambo before?

davidd

6,718 posts

314 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
We've used DNN in the past, the developers felt it was very clumbersome. We are now chucking stuff out with www.cuyahoga-project.net. Seems to be much better although not as much built in functionality. If you need resource let me know.

D

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
rich1231 said:
Plotloss said:
Not as slick as Joomla, got some nice features but isnt coded overly effeciently, needs some meat behind it...


Was it Mambo before?


Joomla was yeah.

Mambo got sold to IBM and the developers that didnt want to work for a corporate span off and set up Joomla.

judas

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

289 months

Wednesday 25th October 2006
quotequote all
Ok - got DotNetNuke installed and running. So far so good. Anyone know how to sort out portal alias problems? I've posted on the DNN forums but it often takes forever to get a reply, if you're lucky.

judas on the DNN forums said:
I've got a clean install of DNN 4.3.5 running on Windows Server 2003. There is no website or header configured for the default website in IIS and DNN is installed in a virtual directory off the default site called DotNetNuke. I can access DNN locally with localhost/dotnetnuke. In attempting to get things working over the 'net I have set up portal aliases in DNN for www.domainname.co.uk, the server's IP address and www.domainname.co.uk/dotnetnuke. The latter is the only one that works; the others just take me to the 'Under construction' page kicked out by the IIS for the default website. The question is what do I need to do to get the portal running on just the domain name without the /dotnetnuke being appended? Is it a caching issue with DNN? I've restarted the website and IIS several times with no joy. Is it an IIS issue? Something in the web.config file?


Anyone got any ideas?

Edit: all sorted now

The good news is that with the aid of some third party modules it will do 95% of what the client wants out of the box.

Edited by judas on Wednesday 25th October 14:26