house valuing "scam" (easylife)
house valuing "scam" (easylife)
Author
Discussion

minimax

Original Poster:

11,985 posts

287 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
I've just had my house valued by the prospective purchaser's valuer, a "respected" firm in gosforth, newcastle. the bloke was here for all of 3 minutes (yes I did count )and that was it!!! Now I happen to know that the company I work for would have charged £280 + £150 admin for that!!!! All he did was have a quick shufti in the lounge, study, master bedroom & kitchen - as if that puts him in a position to state the property is structurally sound!

I can't help thinking this is a bit shoddy - whaddaya reckon?

jon h

863 posts

315 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
We had our house valued a year or so ago for a re-mortgage. We had to pay £115 (paid back if we went with the deal) The bloke was on site for 8 minutes. Spent a while before hand looking for the property as our road "was not on his map" It has been there for 10 years! Having looked aroound he suggested a value. My wife suggested he was talking bo!!ocks So he said he would pop into town and look in some estate agents windows to get a feel for the area! Utter sh!te in my opinion. The alleged "expert" clearly knew nothing about the area at all. Total waste of time & money really.

Jon H

Big_M

5,602 posts

294 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
Not that I am speaking in defence of valuers but once you have added travelling time, travelling costs, possible research, secretary's time in typing up the report plus overheads it soon mounts up. Even though the valuer may only be there for a few minutes there is more work involved.

Many people are under the misconception that the valuer does a full survey - not so - they are only checking that the purchaser is paying the right amount for the property. Protecting the lender's interests and ensuring nothing fraudulent is occurring.

sparkey

789 posts

315 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
Any time I've a valuer round (for re-mortgage etc) they've been in for 1 or 2 minutes then ask me what I've told the building society or bank I think it's worth. Then, surprise, surprise when I get my response from the bank they tell me the value is just as I predicted !!. Why didn't the tosser just stay in his office and give me a call "Hi there I have to value you your house - how much is it worth then - OK thanks I'll use that value "

Nonsense.

whoozit

3,887 posts

300 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
When I bought my house four and a half years ago the surveyor came up with a value of 215,000 - 30,000 below the agreed price. I wasn't best pleased but as the mortgage was 195,000, it didn't stop us buying.

However, I take your point about knowing the area - I mean, I know Isleworth ain't exactly Richmond but it's not next to a slagheap. I would think a six bed house with two garages anywhere in the M25 would be worth way more than what I paid for it, not less.

MikeyT

18,488 posts

302 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all

whoozit said: the mortgage was 195,000


Jesus Harry H Corbett.

Mind you, darn sarf that's probably nowt (nothing)

miniman

30,193 posts

293 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
The person who valued the house I bought last year didn't even come inside. Just did a "drive-by" - apparantly this is to ensure that the house exists and the mortgage company are only interested in knowing if it is worth the amount they are lending. I was borrowing £100k for a £145k house, so even if it was only "worth" £120k, the C&G still have their liability covered. 4 months later, it's worth £160k!! Crazy housing market... don't know how first time buyers can do it anymore.

s2n

6,314 posts

286 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all

miniman said: The person who valued the house I bought last year didn't even come inside. Just did a "drive-by" - apparantly this is to ensure that the house exists and the mortgage company are only interested in knowing if it is worth the amount they are lending. I was borrowing £100k for a £145k house, so even if it was only "worth" £120k, the C&G still have their liability covered. 4 months later, it's worth £160k!! Crazy housing market... don't know how first time buyers can do it anymore.


they can't! I should know im trying to sell 2 x 1 bed houses.....NOTHING!

alunr

1,676 posts

295 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all

miniman said: The person who valued the house I bought last year didn't even come inside. Just did a "drive-by" - apparantly this is to ensure that the house exists and the mortgage company are only interested in knowing if it is worth the amount they are lending. I was borrowing £100k for a £145k house, so even if it was only "worth" £120k, the C&G still have their liability covered. 4 months later, it's worth £160k!! Crazy housing market... don't know how first time buyers can do it anymore.


We're upto £220,000 for a three bed semi with a garage in a "non estate location". I bought it in 1999 for £95K!

They want £115K for a one bed house in Thame now and £125K for a two bed maisonette.

rich-uk

1,431 posts

287 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all

miniman said: don't know how first time buyers can do it anymore.


We can't

rich1231

17,340 posts

291 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
Alun, though prices are high money is cheap so the monthly repayments are likely to be at their lowest in living memory. Its too simplistic to just complain about prices. £115k on a good discounted rate is only £350 to 400 a month.

williamp

20,456 posts

304 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all

rich-uk said:

miniman said: don't know how first time buyers can do it anymore.


We can't


Here here. Hey rich, wanna go halves on a double garage with space out back for a couple of tents?? I should just about be able to afford it.

Oh no, spoke to soon. The price just increased...


...and again...

pies

13,116 posts

287 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all

rich1231 said: Alun, though prices are high money is cheap so the monthly repayments are likely to be at their lowest in living memory. Its too simplistic to just complain about prices. £115k on a good discounted rate is only £350 to 400 a month.


and if the intrest rate starts moving up then trouble starts and after the discount period the repayments rocket

rich-uk

1,431 posts

287 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
Excellent idea

Fatboy

8,269 posts

303 months

Wednesday 12th March 2003
quotequote all

Alun, though prices are high money is cheap so the monthly repayments are likely to be at their lowest in living memory. Its too simplistic to just complain about prices. £115k on a good discounted rate is only £350 to 400 a month.

Yes, but you can't borrow enought to buy (4.5 tims your annual salary at the most), so ven if you could afford the repayments on the cheap interest rates, no lender will give you enough to buy 1st time unless you earn a shitload...

plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Wednesday 12th March 2003
quotequote all
There are lenders in London who will lend 5 times over 50 years. A friend of mine who works at the Stock Exchange - just in marketing, not a trader so no HUGE salary - was offered that last year. It would mean her working until 74...

Shocking.

Matt.

swilly

9,699 posts

305 months

Wednesday 12th March 2003
quotequote all
Some time soon, someone will open their eyes properly and realise the emperor is not wearing any clothes.

rich1231

17,340 posts

291 months

Wednesday 12th March 2003
quotequote all
Fatboy,

this is going to sound very harsh but there is no automatic right to own property. Individuals are able to make a judgement based on circumstance on whether they can afford to purchase or rent in the current market conditions. Money is very cheap at the moment and likely to get even cheaper. There is no way to keep prices down when this and other factors are introduced.

mrsd

1,502 posts

284 months

Wednesday 12th March 2003
quotequote all
Money going to get cheaper ? Not the historical trend. The problem with the market ATM is that the whole model is predicated on FTBs being able to buy and propping up the property ladder. Take them away and the ladder falls over. Make no mistake we're in a bubble and it's going to burst soon-footfall at London agents is already at a 10 year low ATM, the figures only look good because prices are sooooo high.

skittle

312 posts

292 months

Wednesday 12th March 2003
quotequote all
I heard that new mortgage business (50%+)was due to existing homeowners buying additional properties to try and offset the decline in pensions from the stockmarket downturn.

Its all going to turn sour soon when new taxes start taking chunks out my paypacket - NI, Council Tax and any other tax the govt can push through.

First time buyers aint got a hope