RE: Porsche boosts the Boxster
RE: Porsche boosts the Boxster
Thursday 19th October 2006

Porsche boosts the Boxster

More power, speed and performance - but not too much


Porsche Boxster S
Porsche Boxster S
Porsche has boosted the Boxster with more power from a bigger engine -- but it's not 911-threatening.

In the new model year starting 1 August, the Boxster and Boxster S will be given more power and torque, and the optional Tiptronic S transmission and the Sport Chrono Package get additional functions.

The 2.7 litre Boxster engine now develops an additional 5bhp, bringing the total to 245bhp. Torque has increased to 201lb-ft, available from 4,600 rpm. Average fuel consumption is 30.4mpg, an improvement of 1mpg. The Boxster hits 62mph in 6.1 seconds and has a top speed of 160mph; with the optional six-speed gearbox, 161mph can be achieved.

The Boxster S engine, which goes up in size from 3.2 to 3.4 litres, develops 295bhp at 6,250 rpm – 15 bhp more than its predecessor – and 251lb-ft of torque. The Boxster S sprints from 0-62mph in just 5.4 seconds – a tenth of a second quicker than the previous model. The top speed of this model has risen by 2 mph to 169mph. Its average fuel consumption is 26.6mpg.

Valve control

Both flat-six engines are now equipped with VarioCam Plus valve control, with variable valve timing (VarioCam) and changeover valve lift (Plus). Inlet camshaft timing is adjusted by a vane-type actuator with a range of 40 degrees. The valve lift changeover mechanism uses two-position bucket-type tappets on the inlet side, actuated by an electro-hydraulic valve. The bucket-type tappets consist of one tappet inside another; the two tappets can be locked together hydraulically by a pin.

This provides engines with strong pulling power, high peak output and low fuel consumption, according to Stuttgart.

The Boxster and Boxster S can be supplied with the revised Tiptronic S transmission, which has new hydraulics and electronics as well as variable shift programs. When combined with the Sport Chrono Package, up- and downshifts are made only at engine speeds above 3000rpm; downshifts for engine braking are subject to less delay and take place at higher engine speeds. In the manual-shift mode, up-shifts are not made automatically when the engine reaches its maximum rev limit.

On both Boxster models, access for servicing has been improved: the coolant and engine oil filler caps in the rear luggage area are now behind an easily accessible flap, so that better use can be made of the boot space. The Boxster and Boxster S will also be available with the 19-inch ‘Turbo’ forged alloy two-tone wheels that were developed exclusively for the new 911 Turbo. For Boxster models, they are offered as an option in sizes 8 J x 19 (front) and 9 ½ J x 19 (rear).

Both models can be fitted with the new Porsche Vehicle Tracking System as an option. A vehicle security system approved to Thatcham Category 5 standard, Porsche VTS is the only system tested and approved by Porsche engineers at its Weissach research and development centre.

Author
Discussion

bus_ter

Original Poster:

363 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
It's still a Boxster...

framac

785 posts

247 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
9M in Warrington do (or will be doing) a supercharger for the boxster if owners want signifcantly more power.

Don

28,378 posts

314 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
framac said:
9M in Warrington do (or will be doing) a supercharger for the boxster if owners want signifcantly more power.


Driving a 986S with "only" 260bhp this is certainly of interest. Interestingly my 986S does not feel particularly slower than the new car...is the new model heavier?

framac

785 posts

247 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
[quote=Don
Driving a 986S with "only" 260bhp this is certainly of interest. Interestingly my 986S does not feel particularly slower than the new car...is the new model heavier?[/quote]

Give Colin or Marc a bell 01925242342

Adam B

29,724 posts

284 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
eh? isn't this "news" 6 months old?

GTEYE

2,489 posts

240 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
I've heard the new model is 250kg heavier that can't help!

Gulliver911

673 posts

264 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
GTEYE said:
I've heard the new model is 250kg heavier that can't help!


250kg of what ???? Cup holder ??

That does not sound right at all..

anniesdad

14,589 posts

268 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Gulliver911 said:
GTEYE said:
I've heard the new model is 250kg heavier that can't help!


250kg of what ???? Cup holder ??

That does not sound right at all..


It's not. silly 20kg's is the figure.

I've got a new 987 with the extra 5 horses over the previous 2.7. It's being run in at the moment but loosening up nicely and I'm sure the extra 5 horses will make all the difference in time.

Edited by anniesdad on Thursday 19th October 13:00

CliveH

2 posts

244 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
There's nothing new there - "old news"

Edited by CliveH on Thursday 19th October 13:31

kippaxking

185 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
That story first appeared in June....

hammerhead

2,709 posts

284 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
bus_ter said:
It's still a Boxster...

i.e f**king brilliant byebye

woogie

3,313 posts

282 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
would anyone ever consider going from a 911 to a boxster or cayman or is that plain silly ?

jezzaaa

1,951 posts

289 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
woogie said:
would anyone ever consider going from a 911 to a boxster or cayman or is that plain silly ?


Only if their business had gone bankrupt and they needed to economise!!

Being one of those that has a Boxster and can't afford a 911 easily, I may never know what it's like!

scotty_917

1,034 posts

252 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
jezzaaa said:
woogie said:
would anyone ever consider going from a 911 to a boxster or cayman or is that plain silly ?


Only if their business had gone bankrupt and they needed to economise!!

Being one of those that has a Boxster and can't afford a 911 easily, I may never know what it's like!


I've owned both and they're great in their own way...original 2.5 boxster was underpowdered but had great handling and practicality...911 is iconic and the rear engined layout means it's more rewarding to drive...when you get it right! rotate

Gulliver911

673 posts

264 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
woogie said:
would anyone ever consider going from a 911 to a boxster or cayman or is that plain silly ?


I would, if I didn't need rear seats.

Boxster S is a brilliant drive, also outside of a track, when you feel playful and push 3rd gear out of a corner on a twisty country road, you get 6 points on your licence in a Boxster if you get caught, you get sent to jail in a modern 911......

As several people said before me, the 911 is a better car, but not necessarily 40% better.....(Gt3 and Turbo aside).

JL

sidewayssid

523 posts

288 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
woogie said:
would anyone ever consider going from a 911 to a boxster or cayman or is that plain silly ?


I've sold my GT3 (awaiting 997 GT3 RS) but the "one that shall be obeyed" has a Boxster987S after trading up from a 986S. Even though she is a natural blonde she noticed the difference between the two cars and it wasn't just the colour. Enough said.

mk1fan

10,915 posts

255 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
woogie said:
would anyone ever consider going from a 911 to a boxster or cayman or is that plain silly ?


Although not an owner of either a friend of mine went from a 986S to a 996C2 to a 996T to a 987S in the space of two years. Of the four, their favourite was the 987S.

edoardo

229 posts

255 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all

Wintermute

43 posts

281 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Recent test drive in 3.4 987S the car was undoubtably quicker than my facelift 2.7 986, but it didn't feel as quick and seemed more refined than the Cayman S, but then again there was a only a few hundred miles on the clock. Was enough for me to stick money down on a new one though!!

Would probably gone for the Cayman S if it was to be daily driver (though 986 was admirable in this respect, even in winter) AND I could have had a sunroof/targa!

atm

21,410 posts

249 months

Saturday 21st October 2006
quotequote all
edoardo said:


He does seem like it.