Night Surfer
Author
Discussion

Andy M

Original Poster:

3,755 posts

289 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all


C&C welcome wobble

Platinum

2,101 posts

253 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Its a bit underexposed.

Sorry, I don't have anything constructive to say. boxedin

Edited by Platinum on Friday 20th October 17:16

UKBob

16,277 posts

295 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Platinum said:
Sorry, I don't have anything constructive to say

Nope. Me neither. Especailly not to Andy hehe

Andy M

Original Poster:

3,755 posts

289 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Is there a 'Block Poster' button on PH? If not, can we request one?

UKBob

16,277 posts

295 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Andy M said:
Is there a 'Block Poster' button on PH? If not, can we request one?
hehe

Serious comment. Its a nice pic. Would have been better with her jabberclackers out though.

Andy M

Original Poster:

3,755 posts

289 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
I think it's risqué enough as it is

CarMac

669 posts

244 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Very nice pic. Like it a lot.

How does she type though with those long nails?! yikes

UKBob

16,277 posts

295 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
CarMac said:
How does she type though with those long nails?! yikes
I wondered how she did a whole host of other things, but felt it wasnt my place to ask.

Andy M

Original Poster:

3,755 posts

289 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
They're not that long. Though, they do look quite long in that pic

CarMac

669 posts

244 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Certainly not mechanics hands.....like mine !!! hehe

Must be the angle of the shot then if they're not that long.

Andy M

Original Poster:

3,755 posts

289 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Testament to the 5D, that shot is at ISO 3200 with no noise tom-foolery eek

UKBob

16,277 posts

295 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Andy M said:
Testament to the 5D, that shot is at ISO 3200 with no noise tom-foolery eek
One would have to judge by studying an out of focus part of the photo, at 100%. Her breast for example.

Andy M

Original Poster:

3,755 posts

289 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all

--------------------------------------

^ The Tone ^


































































Bob v v v

--------------------------------------

havoc

33,483 posts

265 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
UKBob said:
jabberclackers
clap

I can't believe I'm still learning new words for breasts. I'm impressed Bob. Not so sure Andy is... hehe

Andy M

Original Poster:

3,755 posts

289 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Rest assured, I'm awed by Bob's every post

UKBob

16,277 posts

295 months

Saturday 21st October 2006
quotequote all
havoc said:
UKBob said:
jabberclackers
clap

I can't believe I'm still learning new words for breasts. I'm impressed Bob. Not so sure Andy is... hehe
Permit me a friday night sermon then

Man loveth breast(s);
Just as breast taketh away.
And from one breast does sprout nipple,
and the love of a jabberclacker born.
It taketh but one photography forum,
and with willing, thy B&W bosom is adorned.
Amen (or the equivalent in your native tongue)

Andy M said:

--------------------------------------

^ The Tone ^
You set the mood old bean