Anyone got a Clio 197 yet?

Anyone got a Clio 197 yet?

Author
Discussion

jamiebae

Original Poster:

6,245 posts

212 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
I'm seriously considering getting one but looking at the specs even though it has a 6 speed box it seems like it's going to be a bit buzzy on the motorway (4,200 RPM @ 80 MPH). Is that right? Ideally I'd like something that's a little less loud on the motorway than my Mini and the Clio ticks all the other boxes for a good bit less cash than a Focus ST.

pbirkett

18,093 posts

273 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
I dont think the 197 will be for you then, apparently its quite loud at motorway speeds.

Its also a poor relation to the old one, in as much as its overpriced, heavy and slow.

jamiebae

Original Poster:

6,245 posts

212 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
I've heard that (the heavy bit) but as I don't fit in your version comfortably I can't really compare it!

I can get one new for £14,200 which is pretty cheap for the performance/equipment you get. The best price I can get on a Leon FR TFSI is £15,500 and I've ruled out the Focus ST and Astra VXR because of security concerns.

The gearing on the 197 seems very short for something with a 6 speed box so I was wondering if there was an error in the spec sheet, but the theoretical Vmax in 6th is 142mph at the redline so I guess it's right.

artdealer

258 posts

214 months

Tuesday 24th October 2006
quotequote all
I'm not yet sold on the 197 despite my Renault background. Maybe you should run a 182 Trophy before you take the plunge and wait for the inevitable 197 Cup (style) model that is sure to arrive eventually.

jamiebae

Original Poster:

6,245 posts

212 months

Tuesday 24th October 2006
quotequote all
I'm 6 foot 1 so I can't fit in the old version comfortably for any length of time. The main appeal of the 197 for me is that it has enough space for my needs, all the equipment I want (a/c, cruise etc) and similar performance to the Focus ST, Leon FR, Octavia vRS etc but costs a good bit less to buy and is a bit cheaper to insure too.

warren182

1,088 posts

211 months

Tuesday 24th October 2006
quotequote all
Had a good go in a 197, got a 182 at the moment. 197 feels a lot slower. Megane 225's are available new for less than 197's with more equipment.

jamiebae

Original Poster:

6,245 posts

212 months

Tuesday 24th October 2006
quotequote all
I've just read the 197 vs MCS article in Evo, they mention the Clio is buzzy on the motorway and doing 4.5k rpm at 85, I think that rules it out really

I have noticed the Megane is very cheap, the dealer I went to had an F1 edition at £14.5k ex demo on an 06 plate with 7k miles which is kind of tempting too.

warren182

1,088 posts

211 months

Tuesday 24th October 2006
quotequote all
Drove the meg straight after the 197, felt leagues apart in pace. Similar refinement, but the Megane felt more alive. Didn't feel laggy, was pleasently surprised.

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

244 months

Wednesday 25th October 2006
quotequote all
jamiebae said:
I'm 6 foot 1 so I can't fit in the old version comfortably for any length of time. The main appeal of the 197 for me is that it has enough space for my needs, all the equipment I want (a/c, cruise etc) and similar performance to the Focus ST, Leon FR, Octavia vRS etc but costs a good bit less to buy and is a bit cheaper to insure too.


i'm 6'4" and drive a trophy. I managed a 6 hour non stop drive down to France a short while ago without too much trouble, and ive done plenty of other long (3hr+) drives. Granted the ergonomics are definately flawed (in factt its the worst thing about the car by some distance) but it's easily livable with.

busta

4,504 posts

234 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
IMO the megane is a far better looking beast too. And going by the stats in evo its 1/2 second faster to 60, 13mph faster flat out (so presumably higher geared too), only weights 100kg more and is slightly more economical. Its 2 groups higher insurance but I can't imagine quotes would be far off those for the Clio. So if you cab get it cheaper than the clio i'd definitely go for it.

mattbvw

375 posts

216 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
dcw@pr said:
jamiebae said:
I'm 6 foot 1 so I can't fit in the old version comfortably for any length of time. The main appeal of the 197 for me is that it has enough space for my needs, all the equipment I want (a/c, cruise etc) and similar performance to the Focus ST, Leon FR, Octavia vRS etc but costs a good bit less to buy and is a bit cheaper to insure too.


i'm 6'4" and drive a trophy. I managed a 6 hour non stop drive down to France a short while ago without too much trouble, and ive done plenty of other long (3hr+) drives. Granted the ergonomics are definately flawed (in factt its the worst thing about the car by some distance) but it's easily livable with.


I'm 6'2" and have been in all three (182, Trophy, 197). The seats in the 182 are uncomfortable for my height - I got lower back pains and discomfort in my shoulders (from the awkward steering position) after an hour or so's driving. The Recaros in the Trophy help a lot (much better back support). The 197 (with standard seats) has by far the best driving position of the three. I found it very comfortable - supportive seats (back and lateral) and good wheel and gear lever positions.

In my opinion, the 197 does rev high on the motorway and doesn't have the same lower down grunt as the 182 but is a peach at higher revs and has superb cornering ability. It takes a little getting used to after a 182, it does feel more remote to begin with, but give it a chance and get used to it and it is an incredibly accurate device. There are lots of, mostly very positive, reviews around on the 197 (Autocar, EVO et al) that are worth a look.