US follow the UK with Speed cameras.
US follow the UK with Speed cameras.
Author
Discussion

rodney59

Original Poster:

424 posts

278 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all


The US are following us: www.kvue.com/news/koski/stories/101806kvuecamera-gv.4f8fce43.html (of course its not about money), note the report makes no mention of saving lives!!

But all are not happy, the company is going down www.thenewspaper.com/news/13/1395.asp

UncleDave

7,155 posts

261 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
Article said:
Drivers like Tara Lewis agree.

"I think it is better, I’d rather do that than get pulled over by the cops, I think it's better," said Lewis.


You know, I think it's all about raising money. That's what I think, you know.. I think it's all about raising money.

rodney59

Original Poster:

424 posts

278 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
sorry so many examples, where the US are making money (sorry saving lifes).

www.thenewspaper.com/news/12/1297.asp

"...allowing the installation of red light cameras before it had established that such a system was necessary for traffic safety..."

www.thenewspaper.com/news/13/1384.asp

"Bedford, Dallas, Fort Worth, North Richland Hills, Richland Hills and University Park are now thinking about installing cameras for their share of the revenue"

www.thenewspaper.com/news/12/1265.asp

"The move would erase Chicago's current budget deficit of $64.5 million."

catso

16,523 posts

297 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
rodney59 said:
sorry so many examples, where the US are making money


Well at least they are 'honest' bet they don't try and call'em 'Safety Cameras'....... rolleyes

deva link

26,934 posts

275 months

Tuesday 24th October 2006
quotequote all
www.washingtontimes.com/metro/20060508-120656-4507r.htm

Remember, this is Washington only:
"District's expanding automated traffic-enforcement strategy that has collected more than $138 million since 1999"