Interesting statistic from court

[puggit]

Had a friend over for lunch today who works in a Magistrate court on the legal side - they help to employ magistrates and part of the interview process is to ask which part(s) of law the hopeful mag find unjust.

One guess which one is mentioned by far of the majority?...

[gpshead]

puggit said:

One guess which one is mentioned by far of the majority?...

And one guess what that does to their chances.

Puggit: out of interest, what are the others?

Edited by gpshead on Thursday 9th November 03:21

[voyds9]

Oh that's easy, none of them are unjust infact we need more to fill in the loop holes.

[anonymous-user]

www.magistrates-association.org.uk said:

A balanced bench
The Lord Chancellor requires that each bench should broadly reflect the community it serves in terms of gender, ethnic origin, geographical spread, occupation and political affiliation.

funny how the government are allowed to discriminate on grounds of race and political affiliation.

[7db]

Is anyone else still waiting for a statistic...

[victormeldrew]

No, frankly.

[puggit]

Well strangely enough it's speed enforcement on the roads...

I'm not sure what the others are, it was mentioned during a conversation while I was being asked to consider going forward for the job in order to add some more young blood in to the Mag's pool!

[jasandjules]

francisb said:

funny how the government are allowed to discriminate on grounds of race and political affiliation.

It is called Positive Discrimination.

It is positively outrageous IMHO.

[eliminator]

Puggit

Your last post has a spelling error. You added an "L" to the last word.

[Mr2Mike]

eliminator said:

Puggit

Your last post has a spelling error. You added an "L" to the last word.

Euurgghh