4.2 vs 4.5 cerbie
4.2 vs 4.5 cerbie
Author
Discussion

the machine

Original Poster:

40 posts

252 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
I dont want to start any fights, but....

which is the best cerbie to get?
Ive been wanting one for a while but still unsure if the 4.5 is worth the extra, as both will be very fast cars - equally i dont want to get the 4.2 and then wish i had pushed the boat out for the 4.5.

Is the extra price / bhp worth it??

gazzab

21,640 posts

311 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
Why not try doing some research?

gazzab

21,640 posts

311 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
OK - I was a bit direct there.
4.2 = a bit cheaper.
4.5 = more expensive
4.2 = approx 360 bhp
4.5 = appros 360 bhp
Ignore official stats.
Both are very fast (much the same).
4.5 is more tuneable.
I would suggest that a good spec 4.5 is the easiest to sell on.

jensena

5,671 posts

259 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
There is a lot of info on here about this subject, they are both stunning cars. If your criteria for buying a Cerb was was that you wanted to go racing, then go for a 4.5, because it has more tuning potential. But for road use they are both very similar. I would say dont go and look specifically for a a 4.2 or a 4.5. Instead go and look for a GOOD one, and buy it regardless of the engine size.






the machine

Original Poster:

40 posts

252 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
Thanks, I appreciate the help.

I have done research into both and made drawn my own conclusions, thats why I wanted to get some feedback from people that have owned them!

I definitely want a post 1999/2000 model with the revised lights, and only the 4.5 comes in the lightweight guise so it looks like im heading towards the 4.5 for a few reasons.

gazzab

21,640 posts

311 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
If your budget is 23K plus then go for a 4.5. Rare to find a 4.2 post 2000.

Andyt25

1,190 posts

277 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
The lightweight 4.5...is there a big dif between that an an regular 4.5 as far as performance goes.

Cyclone1

2,614 posts

275 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
Andyt25 said:
The lightweight 4.5...is there a big dif between that an an regular 4.5 as far as performance goes.


Not really.

The amount of power/torque the car has will determine which is quicker and due to each Cerb having a slghtly different engine you tend to see diferent outputs, this can range from as low as 320bhp (both 4.2 and 4.5) upto 370bhp for a good Red Rose Cerb. The 4.5 can be tuned and can easily push 400bhp and beyond, this is where the 4.5 has an advantage over the 4.2, but then that's only applicable if the potential owner wants more power.

I've owned both a 4.2 and 4.5 and as standard prefer the 4.5, but there is not a great deal in it, now that my Cerb has more than 400bhp it is just in another league but only from a performance perspective. As has been said earlier on, if you are in the market for a Cerb then write down exactly what you want from it and then view the Cerbs that fit most of the boxes you have ticked, buying one that is mechanically sound is the wisest recommendation I can make, there is no such thing as a "perfect" Cerb when it comes to buying as sooner or later into ownership you will need to apply some TLC and ££££'s, so buying one that has had a lot of recent mechanical replacements / upgrades is a good start into ownership.

Jules.

gazm

886 posts

273 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
Cyclone1 said:
Andyt25 said:
The lightweight 4.5...is there a big dif between that an an regular 4.5 as far as performance goes.


Not really.

The amount of power/torque the car has will determine which is quicker and due to each Cerb having a slghtly different engine you tend to see diferent outputs, this can range from as low as 320bhp (both 4.2 and 4.5) upto 370bhp for a good Red Rose Cerb. The 4.5 can be tuned and can easily push 400bhp and beyond, this is where the 4.5 has an advantage over the 4.2, but then that's only applicable if the potential owner wants more power.

I've owned both a 4.2 and 4.5 and as standard prefer the 4.5, but there is not a great deal in it, now that my Cerb has more than 400bhp it is just in another league but only from a performance perspective. As has been said earlier on, if you are in the market for a Cerb then write down exactly what you want from it and then view the Cerbs that fit most of the boxes you have ticked, buying one that is mechanically sound is the wisest recommendation I can make, there is no such thing as a "perfect" Cerb when it comes to buying as sooner or later into ownership you will need to apply some TLC and ££££'s, so buying one that has had a lot of recent mechanical replacements / upgrades is a good start into ownership.

Jules.


I think thats a fairly accurate post Jules. From my own point of view I wanted a car I could keep for a few years and continue to improve (suspension BHP etc) so went for a 4.5. I'd of thought that most owners would like to increase power (or is it just me) Jules is totally right about there not being a perfect Cerb. You will end up spending money on it (if not on repairs then 'presents' to yourself (AKA upgrades)
Gareth

cossiemetro

1,092 posts

269 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
mines a genuine 360 bhp decatted 4.2 which i'm led to believe the early ones were lighter aswell, i'd say the average joe would'nt know the difference to be honest
oh and mine is BLUE so its a bit faster anyway .......

BCA

8,651 posts

286 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
The other thing going for the 4.5 is the crank issue that effected the earlier 4.2s.

FUBAR

17,065 posts

267 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
cossiemetro said:

oh and mine is BLUE so its a bit faster anyway .......




And what colour is the sky in your world rolleyes


softtop

3,172 posts

276 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
BCA said:
The other thing going for the 4.5 is the crank issue that effected the earlier 4.2s.


I thought that was all sorted by 1998 scratchchin

cossiemetro

1,092 posts

269 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
as above about the cranks(mine had a new TVR engine after that) and my sky deffo is'nt yellow lol.....

hbeck

424 posts

252 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
the machine said:
Thanks, I appreciate the help.

I have done research into both and made drawn my own conclusions, thats why I wanted to get some feedback from people that have owned them!

I definitely want a post 1999/2000 model with the revised lights, and only the 4.5 comes in the lightweight guise so it looks like im heading towards the 4.5 for a few reasons.



Hope you have seen this one www.pistonheads.com/sales/104634.htm , ok so not a lightweight but one of the best sorted Cerbs for sale at the moment. Must be worth a look!

david smith

716 posts

277 months

Sunday 12th November 2006
quotequote all
I wanted a black one with latest lights .. ideally 4.5 for "nob size conversations" found it ... liked it baught it ...

it had good history had been looked after well but is a 4.2 .. on driving it found it had plenty of power for the road!

In reality I havent driven another to compare - the rolling road day proved its power was up with the pack and im still happy!

I must be a tart as looks for me out weighs performance issues!

My next load of upgrades are interior colour change!

Good luck in your quest ... DAS

byker28i

91,577 posts

246 months

Monday 13th November 2006
quotequote all
I was looking for a V8 one - didn't want an S6. That was it. Size wasn't important but condition, miles and colour were.

I've got the fastest red one (no argument please - that's why top gear were given a red one)

cooky

4,955 posts

266 months

Monday 13th November 2006
quotequote all
softtop said:
BCA said:
The other thing going for the 4.5 is the crank issue that effected the earlier 4.2s.


I thought that was all sorted by 1998 scratchchin


it was, even a year earlier, the bad crank issue was sorted with the '97 cars, there have been a few early 97's going snap, but generaly it was the early cars that suffered, that said anything with 30k plus on the clock will more than likely be ok, it was only a bad batch and not everyone. But if you're into engine breaking out of high speed corners and drive it like a then it doesn't matter what you have it's only a matter of time before the wallet hurt starts. That doesn't mean you can't cane the thing just use some sense and ensure you do the usuals, warm up etc.

4.2 are easier in traffic and around town, smoother when set up properly and an adequate 340+ hp as standard.

4.5 is more tunable and nearer the 360 hp mark in normal state.

both superb, horses for courses, but as said prev. buy on overall condition and check the owner out, if he's one of the looney's in here, then you should be ok...if not then i suggest you take one of us window lickers with you. or send it into a decent indie for a check-out.

all IMO,


good luck
Cooky
NOT driving

Cyclone1

2,614 posts

275 months

Monday 13th November 2006
quotequote all
Cooky,

How did(nt) you get on with the RR chip?

Jules.

Cyclone1

2,614 posts

275 months

Monday 13th November 2006
quotequote all
hbeck said:
[quote=the machine]
Hope you have seen this one www.pistonheads.com/sales/104634.htm , ok so not a lightweight but one of the best sorted Cerbs for sale at the moment. Must be worth a look!


You have good taste, that's one gorgeous Cerb.............