2 different speed limits on the same road
2 different speed limits on the same road
Author
Discussion

Moose.

Original Poster:

5,345 posts

271 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
Anyone know if this is legal? Having the limit as 30mph going in one direction and 50mph in the other direction? The road in question is not a duel carriageway, but has 2 lanes in both directions, just no central reservation. Seems odd that the traffic going one way has to go so much slower than traffic going the other way on the same road confused

(edited to make grammatical sense!)

Edited by Moose. on Monday 15th January 10:37

nobleguy

7,133 posts

245 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
Moose. said:
Anyone know if this is legal? Having the limit as 30mph going in one direction and 50mph in the other direction? The road in question is not a duel carriageway, but has 2 lanes in both directions, just no central reservation. Seems odd that the traffic going one way has to go so much traffic going the other way on the same road confused


Unusual....
Seems a bit weird to limit a road to 30 (presumably due to pedestrian presence, etc) but almost A-road speeds the other way. Maybe an admin error - are the signs new? Or is one set new?

Moose.

Original Poster:

5,345 posts

271 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
The 30 limit signs are temporary as there are some roadworks at the traffic lights at the far end of the road (about 1 mile of 30 limit). Just seems weird as the traffic light roadworks affect both sides, and aren't even along the limited stretch of road.

supermono

7,464 posts

278 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
I can beat that... On the sliproad up to the A11 at Attleborough in Norfolk there are a pair of nice NSL signs. Great except that you're emerging on the roadworks which have a 40 limit. I'm guessing that the speed limit is 70 for people emerging from the sliproad, 40 for those people already on the road until you get to the first 40 repeater.

How they can play so fast and loose with such a valuable safety tool as the speed limit is beyond me...

SM

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
I have encountered a road with different speed limits for traffic travelling in different directions. This is not at roadworks. It's where traffic going from a NSL to a 30 encounters a brief 40 zone but traffic leaving the 30 goes straight to NSL. See diagram:




Edited by SamHH on Monday 15th January 12:33

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

274 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
thrity?
fourty?

Edited by Einion Yrth on Monday 15th January 12:30

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
thrity?
fourty?


I was in a rush.

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

274 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
I seem to recall that there are incidents when a different limit can apply but at the moment cannot put my finger on the reference. An idea being that they want you to slow down coming in and get you out faster going out.

It will all depend what is in the Traffic Regulation Order as to what is lawful.

TVRgit may have some info. He seems clued up on these matters.

dvd

Flat in Fifth

48,913 posts

281 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
Definitely encountered scenario as described by SamHH overseas but not in UK.

I can see how it could easily be dealt with and signed on a dual cabbageway but a shade problematical on a SC surely?

Signage possibly not too difficult on a SC but how would the TRO be worded? Traffic proceeding in the direction of....??

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

274 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
Could be fif- recall from days in the sun????

Just blitzed through Circular Roads 1/93 (Highways bible on speed limits) and cannot find anything to support my original contention. Had there been a system to allow then it would have been mentioned. It isn't.

Wrong. Apologies....

dvd

slowly slowly

2,474 posts

254 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
This section of the A5 is like that, mind you it is a dual-carraigeway, 40mph going south, 50mph going north, the funny thing is there is a speed camera on the 50mph side, you would think it would make more dosh in the 40mph section.

www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=403505&y=306475&z=3&sv=403505,306475&st=4&ar=Y&mapp=newmap.srf&searchp=newsearch.srf&ax=403505&ay=306475


Edited by slowly slowly on Monday 15th January 17:42

tvrgit

8,490 posts

282 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
Dwight VanDriver said:
I seem to recall that there are incidents when a different limit can apply but at the moment cannot put my finger on the reference. An idea being that they want you to slow down coming in and get you out faster going out.

It will all depend what is in the Traffic Regulation Order as to what is lawful.

TVRgit may have some info. He seems clued up on these matters.

dvd

Aw gee DVD you'll make me blush. And there was me thinking nobody ever noticed li'l ole me...

As far as I know, a speed limit applies to a length of road, ie "between points a and b", not "from point a to point b" to minimise (possible deliberate) misinterpretation as applying to 1 direction only. I have always understood that, for that reason, you cannot impose different speed limits in different directions on the same carriageway, under 1/93 as DVD says - so unless there is some more recent statutory instrument or amendment to RTRA, then I don't think it's legally competent to do that. I am not completely up to date on that though so I could be wrong. I have certainly never seen it or heard of it being done (properly) on UK roads.

I think that for a dual carriageway (ie a separate carriageway for each direction) you can specify "direction of travel" in the TRO schedule (or rather, you can schedule different lengths of "northern carriageway" and "southern carriageway" separately).

deva link

26,934 posts

275 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
supermono said:
I can beat that... On the sliproad up to the A11 at Attleborough in Norfolk there are a pair of nice NSL signs. Great except that you're emerging on the roadworks which have a 40 limit. I'm guessing that the speed limit is 70 for people emerging from the sliproad, 40 for those people already on the road until you get to the first 40 repeater.

How they can play so fast and loose with such a valuable safety tool as the speed limit is beyond me...

SM

I think 'they' would be in trouble with that. The repeater's no good on it's own, for a limit to apply proper full size speed signs signs have to be posted on both sides of the carriageway. They should have been put on the slip road before you joined the roadworks - possibly they were there, and had fallen over?

Jwb

332 posts

268 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
So if the limit is different on both sides which limit applies if you over take?

tvrgit

8,490 posts

282 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
deva link said:
supermono said:
I can beat that... On the sliproad up to the A11 at Attleborough in Norfolk there are a pair of nice NSL signs. Great except that you're emerging on the roadworks which have a 40 limit. I'm guessing that the speed limit is 70 for people emerging from the sliproad, 40 for those people already on the road until you get to the first 40 repeater.

How they can play so fast and loose with such a valuable safety tool as the speed limit is beyond me...

SM

I think 'they' would be in trouble with that. The repeater's no good on it's own, for a limit to apply proper full size speed signs signs have to be posted on both sides of the carriageway. They should have been put on the slip road before you joined the roadworks - possibly they were there, and had fallen over?

Not quite.

If you are joining a dual carriageway then you don't need speed limit signs on the slips if the first repeater on the main road is within a certain number of metres from the top of the slip. Normal practice IS to put up a pair of signs (because then you can't be wrong) but you don't necessarily have to.

deva link

26,934 posts

275 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
tvrgit said:
deva link said:
supermono said:
I can beat that... On the sliproad up to the A11 at Attleborough in Norfolk there are a pair of nice NSL signs. Great except that you're emerging on the roadworks which have a 40 limit. I'm guessing that the speed limit is 70 for people emerging from the sliproad, 40 for those people already on the road until you get to the first 40 repeater.

How they can play so fast and loose with such a valuable safety tool as the speed limit is beyond me...

SM

I think 'they' would be in trouble with that. The repeater's no good on it's own, for a limit to apply proper full size speed signs signs have to be posted on both sides of the carriageway. They should have been put on the slip road before you joined the roadworks - possibly they were there, and had fallen over?

Not quite.

If you are joining a dual carriageway then you don't need speed limit signs on the slips if the first repeater on the main road is within a certain number of metres from the top of the slip. Normal practice IS to put up a pair of signs (because then you can't be wrong) but you don't necessarily have to.

What, even if, as in the situation supermono quotes, you pass through NSL signs on the sliproad?

tvrgit

8,490 posts

282 months

Monday 15th January 2007
quotequote all
Sorry, didn't read supermono's bit properly, I was really just replying to your reply.

No i think that if there's a pair of NSL on the slip and then you're expected to slow for main road repeaters, that sounds a bit dodgy right enough.

Unfortunately I don't know the road so can't give a definitive.

deva link

26,934 posts

275 months

Tuesday 16th January 2007
quotequote all
tvrgit said:
Sorry, didn't read supermono's bit properly, I was really just replying to your reply.

No i think that if there's a pair of NSL on the slip and then you're expected to slow for main road repeaters, that sounds a bit dodgy right enough.

Maybe you are *expected* to slow down for the repeaters, but the limit is not legally enforceable unless it starts with twin red circled speed limit signs.

wiggy001

7,389 posts

301 months

Tuesday 16th January 2007
quotequote all
Only road I know if like this is Park Lane in London - 30 southbound and 40 northbound. But this is due to some of the best automotive eye-candy on one side of the road and just a bloody great park on the other...

tvrgit

8,490 posts

282 months

Tuesday 16th January 2007
quotequote all
deva link said:
tvrgit said:
Sorry, didn't read supermono's bit properly, I was really just replying to your reply.

No i think that if there's a pair of NSL on the slip and then you're expected to slow for main road repeaters, that sounds a bit dodgy right enough.

Maybe you are *expected* to slow down for the repeaters, but the limit is not legally enforceable unless it starts with twin red circled speed limit signs.

Yes it is in the circumstances I described. You do not always need twin circles on slips if the first repeater is within a certain distance of the top of the slip. Most authorities think it's safer just to do it because then there's no argument, but you don't always have to.