Official: Congestion charge a failure
Official: Congestion charge a failure
Author
Discussion

Mon Ami Mate

Original Poster:

6,589 posts

299 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
If journey times have increased, it must be a failure. So when will it be removed Ken?

C-charge 'ups journey times'
By Danielle Demetriou, Evening Standard
7 April 2003
Car journeys into the capital are taking a third longer than before the congestion charging scheme started, new figures published today suggest.

The findings indicate that, seven weeks after the start of the scheme, Londoners are experiencing a steady build-up of congestion as they drive from outside the city into the central zone.

The average journey time along the 10 major routes into the city last week was 55.7 minutes, which was more than 32 per cent higher than the average of 38.4 minutes it took motorists during the same week last year.

The figures also revealed that journey times had already increased by 15 minutes in the past seven weeks. The findings came to light in a survey conducted by Trafficmaster, which monitors 10 key routes on a weekly basis, including the A1 from Mill Hill to Islington, the A20 from Swanley to Eltham, the A3 from Cobham to Clapham

While last year's journey times may have been affected by the Easter holidays, motorists are still experiencing a higher rate of congestion now than before the start of the scheme. The worst delays are along routes that motorists are using to avoid entering the charge zone, according to a Trafficmaster spokeswoman.

The key points for delays include the Blackwall Tunnel approaches on the A12 and A102, the A40 Western Avenue, Archway Road and Stoke Newington high street.

The findings were described as a "cause for concern" by Paul Watters, the AA's head of road and transport policy. He said: "I think these figures are very significant, particularly those which reveal that routes into the city are already taking 15 minutes longer compared with the first week of the scheme.

"We are carrying out our own research into it and we have already noticed that roadworks and accidents have reached the same levels as last

and the A23 from Hooley to Brixton. year. To have such a large increase in journey times at this stage does concern us and it is clearly something that needs looking into."

Transport for London, the agency responsible for managing the congestion charge, said it was too soon to comment on the Trafficmaster survey - though its figures revealed that around 100,000 motorists paid the £5 toll every day last week.

This means an estimated 3.5 million charges have been paid during the first seven weeks of the scheme - bringing the total amount of money raised to an estimated £17.5 million.

A further 15,000 penalty charge notices have been issued by TfL, bringing the total number of fines issued since the start of the scheme to 132,000. But 22,000 fines have been overturned after drivers challenged them.

CarZee

13,382 posts

298 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
massive surprise..

Who'd have ever though that the Blackwall Tunnel would end up taking extra load.. although I may have posited something to that effect 2 months ago..

Of course none of this matters because Ken's got the whole propaganda war sown up.

plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Ken was on merlins box last week saying that it would cost £80 million to ditch the congestion charging scheme.

Give me a pump action and 1000 rounds of Alphamax and I'll dismantle it for a tenner.

Matt.

bruce fielding

2,244 posts

313 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Hey - let's extend the zone out to the M25 - that should sort it! And make for much nicer roads to drive on all round to boot.

pdv6

16,442 posts

292 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all

plotloss said: Ken was on merlins box last week saying that it would cost £80 million to ditch the congestion charging scheme.

Give me a pump action and 1000 rounds of Alphamax and I'll dismantle it for a tenner.

Matt.

So that's £80m that somebody will charge for pressing the 'off' switch on the computer system, then?

CarZee

13,382 posts

298 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
I don't see why it should cost £80 million to decomission.. anyway, what about all the money they'll make or selling the whole system, lock stock & barrel to Paris?

DanL

6,590 posts

296 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all

pdv6 said:

plotloss said: Ken was on merlins box last week saying that it would cost £80 million to ditch the congestion charging scheme.

Give me a pump action and 1000 rounds of Alphamax and I'll dismantle it for a tenner.

Matt.

So that's £80m that somebody will charge for pressing the 'off' switch on the computer system, then?


The other question is how much does it cost to keep going...

Dan

plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
The £80m was actually the money that it would cost the government in monies paid to Capita and redundancy pay offs.

Bollocks I say, they should have had the forethought to see it was going to fall flat on its face.

Matt.

CarZee

13,382 posts

298 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Besides, it won't be our council tax the money comes from, will it, Matt

pdv6

16,442 posts

292 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Of course, we're all missing the point, and in fact the scheme is a resounding success.

i.e. It was only ever intended to raise revenue for Ken, and any reduction in congestion would have been an unexpected side effect.

alt

1,879 posts

313 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Wasn't it 5th Gear last week that said that London's Congestion Charging was a success and expect it to be rolled out to a City near you?

Great!

smifffy

2,000 posts

297 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
errrm,

Sorry to scoff about all this chaps but....

I've found traffic to have reduced in the center dramatically. It's now waaaaay quicker to get a cab anywhere than before the charging was brought in.

I work in Victoria where you can visibly see that the traffic is much less. I've also spoken to any number of cabbies who have all said it's much easier to drive around central London. In fact they were moaning becuase it's too easy, so journeys are quicker and cabbies are becoming free much more quickly - hence they have to fight for fares.

So personally it seems like it's worked.

plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Problem is though Andy, the congestion has now shifted, there are the same amount of people coming in but they are now parking in the boroughs that arent covered....

Matt.

smifffy

2,000 posts

297 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Fair play Matt, I just come into the centre and then out again by train everyday so I wouldn't be able to judge that impact.

TJMurphy

239 posts

294 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
I drive into London every day and I reckon traffic is still lighter than before congestion charging. It's certainly crept up from the first couple of weeks but it's still, IMHO, about consistent with a very good run pre CC. But whereas before I'd only get a good runs once every couple of months, now I reckon I get them about 2/3 of the time.
PS Knowing the Evening Standard, it wouldn't surprise me if they compared a holiday week last year to a non-holiday week this year

hughjayteens

2,029 posts

299 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
I must admit that for me too, it has mader things much better.

I just wish they would extend the zone another mile or so in each direction so I would be exepmt then!

Can't see them scrapping it until it has paid for itself at least though?

deltaf

6,806 posts

284 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Con-gestion Charge failing....like we didnt say so or nothin like that! Now theyre sayin itll cost 80 mill to shut it off, sounds like an excuse to keep it goin!!
Scrap it you nutcase.

bikerkeith

794 posts

295 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Congestion charging is brilliant. I can bike it to work consistently in less than an hour, which I haven't been able to do for years. I just have to make sure I get in fairly early as the bike bays fill up much quicker.

peter_964rs

287 posts

304 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all

bikerkeith said: Congestion charging is brilliant. I can bike it to work consistently in less than an hour, which I haven't been able to do for years. I just have to make sure I get in fairly early as the bike bays fill up much quicker.


Ditto

manek

2,978 posts

315 months

Monday 7th April 2003
quotequote all
Yes, I go into town once or twice a week on average (actually on the train, but YKWIM) and I can get a cab to wherever just like that, much quicker to find and to make the journey than ever.

Congestion charging? Love it...