Evil Scum Tabloid Sucks Humble Sausage...
Evil Scum Tabloid Sucks Humble Sausage...
Author
Discussion

CarZee

Original Poster:

13,382 posts

298 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all
It was only a matter of time before the evil lunatic editor of said paper came unstuck.. I do hope the guy takes them for millions.. and I hope Rupert kicked her butt good & proper..

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/2932301.stm

Sun apologises for paedophile mistake

A national newspaper has taken out a newspaper advertisement apologising to a man it wrongly identified as a convicted paedophile.

The Sun is to pay damages to David Gazley, 40, of Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, after printing his picture by mistake.

Last month, the tabloid paper carried a photograph of Mr Gazley next to the headline "Face of kid ban pervert".

It followed the conviction of another man of indecently assaulting two young girls.

Mr Gazley left his home and sought police protection after the article was circulated in Great Yarmouth.

The Sun has already printed two apologies.

On Wednesday the tabloid took out an advertisement in the regional daily newspaper the Eastern Daily Press, saying "Sorry David Gazley".

Freelance error

It blames an error by a freelance picture agency.

The Sun has also agreed to pay damages to Mr Gazley but the amount is still being negotiated with libel lawyers.

Its editor Rebekah Wade pioneered a "name and shame" campaign against convicted sex offenders when she was editor of the News of the World.

After the Sun published Mr Gazley's photograph, but he said he was "afraid to go out in public" and moved out of his home because he was worried about attacks from vigilantes.

Mr Gazley was not prepared to comment on Wednesday.
Edited to say: I wonder if the Sun know that there's no such thing as paedophilia in Norfolk - it's all just good clean family entertainment up there

seafarer

1,278 posts

284 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all
Jayzuss, Carzee, that is a really graphic thread title. There is a public registry of sex offenders in the US put up by law enforcement agencies, who are less likely to forget the names of whomever they've booked. I hope this guy puts the Sun out of business.

Bodo

12,625 posts

297 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all
Oh yes, I hope the consequences make an example on how painful it could be for media spilling wrong information over the public.

CarZee

Original Poster:

13,382 posts

298 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all

Bodo said: how painful it could be for media spilling wrong information over the public.
that's the best mixed metaphor I've heard in years Good show!

Sparks

1,217 posts

310 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all

CarZee said
...........
Edited to say: I wonder if the Sun know that there's no such thing as paedophilia in Norfolk - it's all just good clean family entertainment up there


Oi, not all people from Norfolk are like that. Well, maybe all the ones from over the east side are

Sparks

'Kee yo on a troshn bor' (from boo'iful Noorfook, originally )

nicholasblair

4,111 posts

315 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all
scum scum scum tabloid press

shower of total t*****s.

swilly

9,699 posts

305 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all
Hey, come on now we must all Thinkofthechildren.

apache

39,731 posts

315 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all

nicholasblair said: scum scum scum tabloid press

shower of total t*****s.




exactly, I despair of people who buy these vile rags

domster

8,431 posts

301 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all

seafarer said: Jayzuss, Carzee, that is a really graphic thread title. There is a public registry of sex offenders in the US put up by law enforcement agencies, who are less likely to forget the names of whomever they've booked. I hope this guy puts the Sun out of business.


IIRC, the name of the bloke wasn't printed, it was just his picture ie

Dazely's face with the caption 'Mr A Pedo, pictured today'

Therefore, his name won't be put on registers and stuff, but people may recognise his mugshot and think he is Mr A Pedo not Mr Dazley.

Still, a bit of a pisser, and I bet his wife wan't too chuffed...

To be honest, the tabloid that winds me up is The Mirror, as they are trying to be so politically correct and 'tell it as it really is' with their Think again campaign, that they were virtually siding with Saddam. Whilst The Sun was just having a jingoistic feelgood fest, going on about 'our boys' kicking Saddam's arse, The Mirror were condemning it all. Now that Iraq looks substantially free from tyranny, I bet The Mirror try and do an about-face and say what a good idea the war was... wouldn't surpise me at all, the hypocritical gits. At least The Sun were ignorantly patriotic all the way through!!!!

>> Edited by domster on Thursday 10th April 11:44

MikeyT

18,506 posts

302 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all
They say he'll get between £10,000 and £20,000 in compensation for his life being *ruined*.

Saw the bloke on TV last night and he was in tears - lost his job apparently - has he got more of a case against the picture agency?

The Sun used it 'in good faith' (lawyer-speak) and so sadly, won't be put out of business.

CarZee

Original Poster:

13,382 posts

298 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all

domster said: Still, a bit of a pisser, and I bet his wife wan't too chuffed...
yeah - he must have felt a right twat picking her up from school after that

deltaf

6,806 posts

284 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all

apache said:

nicholasblair said: scum scum scum tabloid press

shower of total t*****s.




exactly, I despair of people who buy these vile rags


Lets face it mate, they dont buy it to read....whether or not they even can read is another question......


>> Edited by deltaf on Thursday 10th April 11:48

domster

8,431 posts

301 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all
Also... (LOL, I am doing a CarZee today and being 's Advocate!) is it really fair to screw The Sun over when some shit brain at a picture agency ****ed up?

If The Sun got it wrong, yeah, hang them from the lamposts. But the chimps at the picture agency got it wrong. Must have had 'pedo pics' filed too closely to 'peeps who definitely don't fiddle with kids'. Idiots.

I would sue the arse off the Picture agency until they went under if I was The Sun. Which you probably think I am now, anyway


>> Edited by domster on Thursday 10th April 11:49

CarZee

Original Poster:

13,382 posts

298 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all
Dom - IMO it's immaterial who got the finer details wrong - this is a fcuk up of editorial policy on the matter of name & shame (or print picture & shame in this case).

Rebekah Wade is a most unsavoury person & I hope she gets her comeuppance for this whole policy.

domster

8,431 posts

301 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all
I see what you mean, policy decision and all.

This is a wider debate, of course. I suppose there are things to be said for and against naming and shaming.

I think I dislike all tabloid editors equally. Piers and his share tips was a good one, eh?

CarZee

Original Poster:

13,382 posts

298 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all

domster said: I think I dislike all tabloid editors equally. Piers and his share tips was a good one, eh?
Well indeed... Piers Morgan should be fired into orbit using some kind of super cannon device.. however, I think Yelland was a much more benign entity as Editor of The Sun than the current incumbant.

smifffy

2,000 posts

297 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all

CarZee said:

Bodo said: how painful it could be for media spilling wrong information over the public.
that's the best mixed metaphor I've heard in years Good show!


rpguk

4,520 posts

315 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all
I say shoot everyone who reads the sun or guardian

Don

28,378 posts

315 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all

CarZee said: Rebekah Wade is a most unsavoury person & I hope she gets her comeuppance for this whole policy.




domster

8,431 posts

301 months

Thursday 10th April 2003
quotequote all

rpguk said: I say shoot everyone who reads the sun or guardian


Get rid of both ends of the spectrum and all you're left with is Independent readers...

I read both Sun and Guardian, and form an opinion somewhere in the middle