how safe is the monaro
how safe is the monaro
Author
Discussion

stigcv8

Original Poster:

22,454 posts

232 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
out of interest, just how safe is the car? Is there any kind of ncap rating for it? Sure it is big but size != safe by default

phrich

549 posts

245 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
The Pontiac GTO didn't make it into Canada due to safety concerns.
I can't find any details about it on the interweb.
Maybe it was pedestrian safety?

stu harris

469 posts

263 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
Monaro received a 4 star rating on the Australian NCAP in Feb 04.

Stu

bennno

14,825 posts

291 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
stu harris said:
Monaro received a 4 star rating on the Australian NCAP in Feb 04.

Stu


Is that on a rating of 5 or 10 stars maximum? hehe

Bennno


V-Car

225 posts

260 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
bennno said:
stu harris said:
Monaro received a 4 star rating on the Australian NCAP in Feb 04.

Stu


Is that on a rating of 5 or 10 stars maximum? hehe

Bennno




5 stars.

Edited by V-Car on Monday 5th February 08:48

stigcv8

Original Poster:

22,454 posts

232 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
the canadian issues could be "aboot" the fuel tank placement

wayne marsh

117 posts

229 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
Is the fuel tank not made of "plastic" and as it's now positioned behind the rear seat I would have thought it would pass "most" worldwide safety requirements, including Canada.

V-Car

225 posts

260 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
The fuel tank was placed behind the seat in the GTO to satisfy US regs regarding rear impact, so it was just easier to build all Monaro's with it that way.
Originally, the boot had far more space with the tank around the spare in the floor.
Regarding Canada, i seem to recall it wasnt sold there because of something to do with it not complying with bumper impact standards (5 or 10 kmh?) which i think are now more stringent than the US.

phrich

549 posts

245 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
That sounds right about the 5-10mph bumber standards.
I associated that with pedestrian safety at the time of reading it a couple of years back.

Bottom line is you will have more mass and larger crumple zones than 80% of the cars on UK roads and as long as your insurance is paid up then mass has a lot to do with multiple vehicle accidents.

Ps don't take on a brick wall as then you are relying purely on crumple zone.

Raggyman

2,317 posts

265 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
Put it this way... wouldn't feel safer in any other car. Had quiet a few commodores, and well, due to other idiots being on the road, and not watching what they are doing, have had one two cases in my VN where cars ran up my backside. The other cars were a complete right off, but the VN got repaired every time. Looking in the mirror, and seeing the car behind you completely totalled, you think, umm, well this one is a gonna now. Car has been totally driveable, only thing being that the boot didn't close. Unfortunately there are other idiots out on the road. In all cases, police have fined the people for not driving with due care, which was a consulation..

The Monaro is a pretty rock solid car, and really the only car that I feel safe in.

ringram

14,701 posts

270 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
The good old towbars help with those failed rear entries

featherfoot

204 posts

248 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
You can run a sheep over- heavy F**ckers (in so many ways)- and sustain relatively little damage - even at 60mph!

Paul-C

1,126 posts

247 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
ringram said:
The good old towbars help with those failed rear entries



biglaugh Mine is called my reversing sensor