Subaru Legacy 3.0R engine mapping
Discussion
I have extensive experience with the Legacy 3.0R at a particular test facility outside of Pretoria. Plenty of test track work behind the wheel of one so I know the 3.0R very well.
What I can tell you is that the engine remap does not boost low rpm torque perceptibly...
Bear in mind that the facility is at around 1600m above sea level which blunts the low-down response of the 3.0R. But there's a particular rising right hander hairpin that:
a) either shows the driver exactly how he botched the corner or
b) highlights a car's lack of low down grunt.
Get the corner hooked up just right and you'll be just a touch off 4000 rpm and accelerating, at a fraction over 4000 there's noticeable uptake in the engine delivery as the more aggressive cam profile kicks in. It's not Honda v-tec prevalent but it is there.
This step in the power delivery is present in both pre-facelit and facelift versions. As I currently understand it, this is down purely to the mechanical configuration of the engine which has not changed between the aforementioned versions. I am of the impression that the engine remap has more to do with the introduction of SI-Drive than to bring about a marked improvement in torque delivery from below 4000 rpm. The short stroke Boxer six is mechanically constrained in producing low down torque output and there's not much getting away from that.
What I can tell you is that the engine remap does not boost low rpm torque perceptibly...
Bear in mind that the facility is at around 1600m above sea level which blunts the low-down response of the 3.0R. But there's a particular rising right hander hairpin that:
a) either shows the driver exactly how he botched the corner or
b) highlights a car's lack of low down grunt.
Get the corner hooked up just right and you'll be just a touch off 4000 rpm and accelerating, at a fraction over 4000 there's noticeable uptake in the engine delivery as the more aggressive cam profile kicks in. It's not Honda v-tec prevalent but it is there.
This step in the power delivery is present in both pre-facelit and facelift versions. As I currently understand it, this is down purely to the mechanical configuration of the engine which has not changed between the aforementioned versions. I am of the impression that the engine remap has more to do with the introduction of SI-Drive than to bring about a marked improvement in torque delivery from below 4000 rpm. The short stroke Boxer six is mechanically constrained in producing low down torque output and there's not much getting away from that.
Interesting
I have noticed a definite pick up around 3K revs, it then pulls like a train up to 7K although showing a little mechanical sympathy (as well as to my wallet with petrol usage) I generally change up before then.
As I understand it the Legacy layout is very similar to Porsche (but with the engine at the correct end
) so maybe some mod lessons could be learned from there? I think I'll put any mods on the back burner for the moment as it's plenty quick enough, for the time being..
I have noticed a definite pick up around 3K revs, it then pulls like a train up to 7K although showing a little mechanical sympathy (as well as to my wallet with petrol usage) I generally change up before then. As I understand it the Legacy layout is very similar to Porsche (but with the engine at the correct end
) so maybe some mod lessons could be learned from there? I think I'll put any mods on the back burner for the moment as it's plenty quick enough, for the time being.. Gassing Station | Japanese Chat | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



