Surely it is a 'later car'
Surely it is a 'later car'
Author
Discussion

gazzab

Original Poster:

21,640 posts

311 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
www.pistonheads.com/sales/125101.htm

I dont understand why this is described as having a headlight conversion and looking like a much later car....?!
It is a 2000 lightweight with the original pods but looking like a 2000 lightweight with original pods. Unless I am mistaken!?!?! Why would a 'TVR dealer' not know his TVRs?

TVRWhoa

349 posts

289 months

Monday 5th February 2007
quotequote all
perhaps the owner converted the original headlights to lightweight pods, I'm going to do the same thing, as I like it better than the faired in look - so chances are its not a lightweight ?

gazzab

Original Poster:

21,640 posts

311 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
No it has lightweight seats, lightweight roof etc etc.....

Ireland

3,517 posts

243 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
Oil pressure doesn't look great .....

carl_w

10,744 posts

287 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
Maybe it originally had the unblended pods and they were blended in?

gazzab

Original Poster:

21,640 posts

311 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
gosh low ish oil pressure - hopefully just needs a spring.

It has got non-blended pods. So I Cant see why it claims to look like a later car.

thegreengoblet

1,040 posts

245 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
Looking at the exterior piller uprights on the interior picture.... it looks like they are covers? I don't think my lightweigth looks like that? Gonna have to go and have a look!


Edited by thegreengoblet on Tuesday 6th February 12:22

carl_w

10,744 posts

287 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
gazzab said:
It has got non-blended pods. So I Cant see why it claims to look like a later car.
Sorry, you're right. In the thumbnails they look blended to me, but the full image reveals the truth.

redleicester

6,869 posts

274 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
That chap gets through quite a lot of TVRs and from what Ive seen over the last few years does occasionally make the odd wild comment that makes little sense.... rolleyes

Oh and his typeeng and spelin is worse than mine hehe


Edited by redleicester on Tuesday 6th February 17:54

Mr.Cerbera

5,151 posts

259 months

Thursday 8th February 2007
quotequote all
Perhaps he means it's an HID Conversion ?

DC53

3,217 posts

249 months

Thursday 8th February 2007
quotequote all
Those headlight do look very 'bodged in!'

gazzab

Original Poster:

21,640 posts

311 months

Thursday 8th February 2007
quotequote all
DC53 said:
Those headlight do look very 'bodged in!'

Thats how they came from the factory in 00/01

carlb

159 posts

252 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
Lightweight?

can you explain the differences and the benifits

cheers

gazzab

Original Poster:

21,640 posts

311 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
The differences are some lighter panels (doors and bonnet?).
The roof line is slightly different. The view through the screen is better. It will (generally) have different front lights (pods are blended tuscan esque) and the rear 'tank' lights. It will have tuscan seats (the ones that break). slightly different style rear seats. It will have body coloured mouldings on the A posts (?).
The 4.2 lightweights still had the old style MG lights as did the S6 lightweights.

carlb

159 posts

252 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
cheers

sorry to sound like a philistine...but how do i know if mine is a lightweight?

its a 03 cerb with the seats you've described but i wouldn't know about the other stuff

Cyclone1

2,614 posts

275 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
gazzab said:
The differences are some lighter panels (doors and bonnet?).
The roof line is slightly different. The view through the screen is better. It will (generally) have different front lights (pods are blended tuscan esque) and the rear 'tank' lights. It will have tuscan seats (the ones that break). slightly different style rear seats. It will have body coloured mouldings on the A posts (?).
The 4.2 lightweights still had the old style MG lights as did the S6 lightweights.


Never realised that the later 4.2 and S6 came as lightweights?

Jules.

gazzab

Original Poster:

21,640 posts

311 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
They have the same look ie seats, roofline, seats etc but the 4.2 and S6 still had the old lights. I call that lightweight but I dont know if that means they are 'light' or whether TVR called them lightweight.

gazzab

Original Poster:

21,640 posts

311 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
carlb said:
cheers

sorry to sound like a philistine...but how do i know if mine is a lightweight?

its a 03 cerb with the seats you've described but i wouldn't know about the other stuff


It looks like a lightweight (ie has all the stuff I mentioned). Is it a 4.5 ?

Cyclone1

2,614 posts

275 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
gazzab said:
They have the same look ie seats, roofline, seats etc but the 4.2 and S6 still had the old lights. I call that lightweight but I dont know if that means they are 'light' or whether TVR called them lightweight.


True but not sure that the later 4.2 and S6 had the lighterweight panels.

carlb

159 posts

252 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
its a 4.2

i hope its a lightweight, that will make me alot faster to tesco and back i'm sure