New bag or a Peli?
Author
Discussion

matthew_h

Original Poster:

575 posts

245 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
I've reached the point where I need a new system for carrying my kit but I am not sure what the best plan is.

At the moment I've got a Tamrac rucsack and a shabby shoulder bag that I got for £3 from a charity shop but I could do with something that can house all of my kit in one place.

I've been thinking about one of the really big Tamrac rucsacks but wonder whether a Peli or similar might be a better bet. The rucsack is about £110 through ebay and I know that Pelis are a bit more than that but think I could cope.

At the moment it is unlikely that I will be flying with my kit so don't really need the added protection of a Peli right now but it is something that may happen in the future.

Any thoughts anyone?

V6GTO

11,579 posts

272 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
Pelicans are great...they just cost more, are heavier, and scream "I'm worth stealing!"

Martin.

PS - BTW...everyone knows that LowePro make the best bags

fergusd

1,251 posts

300 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
I bought a peli 1520 during last years . . . 'terror' . . . 'alert' . . . then the feckers changed the baggage allowance 3 days before I flew to stop you taking anything bigger than a laptop sized bomb on the plane so never used it for a while . . . but recently I've been using it as a 'lob in the boot and don't worry about it' kinda bag thing . . . they are very good protection wise and I may well take it as hand luggage next week on a wee trip to Canada (especially to minimise condensation issues with the cold - I had ice forming on the D2x's metal case last year in colorado after being out in the deep cold for sustained periods of time then going into a building), however they are a pain in the arse because they are so heavy and relatively inflexible compared to a bag . . . you won't be walking off up a hill with a large peli, unless you're taking man in a defender with you to carry it . . . so I recon a shoulderable bag is probably much more practical unless you need the protection side of things . . . the theft aspect is not lost on me either, but hey, that's why you have insurance . . .

Fd

matthew_h

Original Poster:

575 posts

245 months

Tuesday 6th February 2007
quotequote all
Cheers for the opinions chaps.

I don't really need to added protection at the moment so looks like a rucsack is going to be a better bet for me right now. I guess that if I find that I need the extra protection in the future then I know what I need to do.

A new bag is the cheaper option too, sorted!