Is air con a must have?
Discussion
Hi Guys, my air con heat exchanger ( The Rad.) Is rotten as pear and needs replacing, as does the bomb, also i have the added hassle of locating the pump on my LS conversion, not impossible but extra work/expense. Also the heat exchanger covers the whole front of the engine coolant rad. How important do you reckon it is on these cars worth the extra hassle or not.
Will be sussing it out myself, it looks like the pump MIGHT fit where it did on the original bracket but it will be close. If not its find a more compact pump or mount else where. TBH i reckon most of you out there will have leaky/rotten heat exchangers judging by the state of mine. My car was'nt as bad as some i've seen. It was reccomended by an inspection only 8 months before i bought it! The exchanger is only around £130 so not the end of the world, and at the mo its easy to get to as the body is off.
raw cerb said:
I was think about taking mine out, in my campaign to save weight. (Not sure if i am losing the plot though)
You will find that you will lose weight but it is just water. So once you have drunk a couple of pints of water to replace the sweat then you are as heavy again. ;-)
A must. We took my old car to classic le mans in 2004, 35+ degrees, & the air con barley coped. I hate to think what it would have been like without.
Mine only used to work if the windows were fully closed. If the windows were partially open you could feel hot air coming through the handbrake area, & would switch to ice cold when the windows were up.
Anyone elses the same?
Mine only used to work if the windows were fully closed. If the windows were partially open you could feel hot air coming through the handbrake area, & would switch to ice cold when the windows were up.
Anyone elses the same?
Not really, i would consider heating alot more important, in fact since around the 50's it has become common practice and even considered standard equipment, if i am not wrong? However A/C has only recently become standard fair on lots of cars. I in fact had a transit until recently, and that did not have A/c and it did not bother me atall, However the heater was especially useful in the winter.
brummiewedge said:
Not really, i would consider heating alot more important, in fact since around the 50's it has become common practice and even considered standard equipment, if i am not wrong? However A/C has only recently become standard fair on lots of cars. I in fact had a transit until recently, and that did not have A/c and it did not bother me atall, However the heater was especially useful in the winter.
Well you asked for opinions, that was mine. Anyway you obviously know what you want. Or did I miss something? and this is a vote so we can decide for you?
My background is in the refrigeration business.
While vehicle air-con is something I don't do a lot of, if someone asked me to look at the system in a TVR (or other similar exotic) in the past I'd have jumped at the chance.
When I got my Cerb the air-con wasn't working on it and there was a huge difference in travelling in the car once I fixed it.
I'd say get it working.

While vehicle air-con is something I don't do a lot of, if someone asked me to look at the system in a TVR (or other similar exotic) in the past I'd have jumped at the chance.
When I got my Cerb the air-con wasn't working on it and there was a huge difference in travelling in the car once I fixed it.
I'd say get it working.

Gassing Station | Cerbera | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


