Oregon Scientific ATC-2000

[Rawwr]

Is shit. Don't bother.

This quality review was brought to you by Rawwr.

[Desmotip]

Care to expand a little?

[veetwin]

Thanks for the feedback, spooky really as we have been looking at Bullet Cams for our trackday on 9th April.

[Rawwr]

Desmotip said:

Care to expand a little?

I'll post up a sample video a bit later. Lack of any kind of image stabilisation is probably the crux of the shítness and the audio recording leaves a LOT to be desired. It probably wouldn't be so bad if you wanted to record yourself riding at 15mph everywhere but at, well, 'higher speeds' it gets abysmal.

[RemaL]

I have one and OK the quality is what something like "640X480" but have found it to be very good for a small stand alone item. If you want very good quality then use a camcorder. But I wanted soemthing I can use ont he Kit car and Bike. Of wich Both have tunred out good at even speeds over 70MPH

[Rawwr]

Did you find the sound went funny above 130?

[RemaL]

Rawwr said:

Did you find the sound went funny above 130?

Its's find up to 110. but how much sound do u want at above 100 on something that small?

[shot2bits]

I've got one - they're not that bad! Sound will always be crap and the resolution isn't as good as a bullet cam and camcorder but they're small and record to an SD card so easy to carry around. It's a good device to mess around with but yeah, a bullet cam setup would be far far better...