Result of Unleaded v Optimax
Result of Unleaded v Optimax
Author
Discussion

iandbeech

Original Poster:

2,709 posts

285 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2003
quotequote all
Completely un-scientific but tried over about 800 miles.

Picked up car (Chimaera 4.0HC 94) early Feb fueled up with Tesco unleaded to get home - car ran fine with no roughness at idle or slow through town. From then on Optimax only and gradual deteriation in slow running with gearbox shunting etc at low revs though fine at higher revs and speeds - never awful but it was there.

Last couple of tank fulls gone to Shell unleaded and smooth idle etc has returned and no gearbox shunting - higher revs and speeds fine with no noticeable deteriation in performance.

I know Optimax gives better performance (and is therefore a good idea for track days where the difference may be noticeable) overall but is it the correct choice for everyday driving? I was told by someone experienced with TVRs that normal unleaded is perfectly adequate for everyday running (but of course we all want to put "the best" in our cars don`t we?!).

I know the stepper motor is often mentioned for cases of rough running, but if my experience is anything to go by, it may be worth trying the fuel first.

_DJ_

5,052 posts

281 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2003
quotequote all
Super unleaded or regular? Perhaps your particular engine has been setup to run on regular unleaded and therefore the effect of a fuel with higher RON isn't as you'd expect?

richa

534 posts

311 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2003
quotequote all
Tried Optimax for the first time in my wedge at the weekend, the result is no pinking at high revs. Result!!!

iandbeech

Original Poster:

2,709 posts

285 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2003
quotequote all

_DJ_ said: Super unleaded or regular? Perhaps your particular engine has been setup to run on regular unleaded and therefore the effect of a fuel with higher RON isn't as you'd expect?



Regular unleaded - it did cross my mind that perhaps using Optimax might need the engine being tweaked but would that really be the case?

icamm

2,153 posts

287 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2003
quotequote all

iandbeech said:

_DJ_ said: Super unleaded or regular? Perhaps your particular engine has been setup to run on regular unleaded and therefore the effect of a fuel with higher RON isn't as you'd expect?



Regular unleaded - it did cross my mind that perhaps using Optimax might need the engine being tweaked but would that really be the case?
It could be. The timing is altered for different types of petrol so if it's set for standard unleaded the extra "bang" from the Optimax could be working at the wrong point in the stroke. Ask your mechanic next time it's being looked at if he can check what it's been set to run on.

mrs fish

30,018 posts

285 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2003
quotequote all
Fish speaking:

My T350 definately runs better on the higher octane Optimax with any lower rev pinking disappearing when the engine is hot.

Optimax is 98.6RON wheras Super is only 97RON. I therefore never pay the higher price for Super as it isn't worth it. As has been mentioned the effect will depend on the tune of your engine as TVR engines have no Knock sensor and thus can't adjust timing automatically for the fuel used.


shpub

8,507 posts

299 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2003
quotequote all
I don't know who said that TVRs run fine on plain unleaded as the truth, especially with the Rover engines is far from it. The Rover based cars are designed to run on Super fuel and should be adjusted to run on plain unleaded.

Gone through this in detail in the bible and on the unleaded FAQ on my website which quotes the appropriate TVR bulletins.

Steve
www.tvrbooks.co.uk

pbrettle

3,280 posts

310 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2003
quotequote all
Mr Heath, he speaks the truth!

If you still have the sticker next to the fuel filler cap on the Rover V8 models you will specifically see that the car is designed to take SUPER Unleaded fuel only. Yes, you can run it on ordinary Unleaded, but you will pay a performance penalty and potentially rough running damage (though unlikely really).

So 97 / 98 RON it is then. Mine has had the timing knocked back to cope with Unleaded without any problems. However, it runs much smoother and easier on Super and even better on Optimax. Although you can run it on Unleaded, it is better to run the RV8 engines on super (unless you have had the timing adjusted). The newer engines are different, but I suspect that they are similar in that they prefer Super....

Cheers,

Paul

kevinday

13,765 posts

307 months

Thursday 24th April 2003
quotequote all
I can't find the thread but I think I remember MrsD saying that older engines may suffer long term valve seat damage using Optimax because it has a higher detergent level (or something like that). Super U/L may well be better for Rover V8 engined cars.

Tony Hall

23,011 posts

309 months

Thursday 24th April 2003
quotequote all
When I picked up my Chimaera 4.0HC from a main dealer 2 and a half (&20k miles) ago I was told Super UL was best but it would run perfectly well on ordinary UL except possibly on a hot day or if driven hard. Seems ok to me on ordinary, you do occasionally get a bit of transmission shunt at LOW revs but otherwise fine.

mongoose

4,360 posts

282 months

Thursday 24th April 2003
quotequote all
cant say i can tell much benefit if any,running on optimax,but i use it in my griff 500 as much as poss after reading the article on long term optimax use in evo magazine.results were very impressive with regards keeping valvegear clean etc.

CROUCHY

83 posts

285 months

Thursday 24th April 2003
quotequote all
Just a unscientific feeling but '94 Chimaera appears to perform

BEST - Super Unleaded
OK - Optimax
Not SO GREAT - Regular Unleaded

Cheers,
Crouchy

Painey

534 posts

283 months

Thursday 24th April 2003
quotequote all
I also read the article in Evo about Optimax so try to use it in the Griff 500 wherever possible and especially so after reading Steve's book. Can't say I've had any problems with it apart from the usual jerkiness when cold but that happens with any fuel.

plotloss

67,280 posts

297 months

Thursday 24th April 2003
quotequote all
2001 Chim 450 likes normal unleaded (as recommended by dealer and factory) much more than Optimax for some reason.

Timing perhaps?

Matt.

xain

261 posts

304 months

Thursday 24th April 2003
quotequote all
OPtimax does seem to be good stuff, which is a shame, as I've been boycotting Shell on ethical grounds for about 7 years.

It does noticably improve the pinking situation, even to the point where a subsequent first full tank of 95 RON is almost pink-free.

iandbeech

Original Poster:

2,709 posts

285 months

Thursday 24th April 2003
quotequote all
When was Optimax introduced? Also - never noticed Super-unleaded at a Shell garage (although wasn`t looking for it) and assumed only Regular unleaded or Optimax. Will give Super a go to compare.

richard sails

813 posts

286 months

Thursday 24th April 2003
quotequote all
My cars prefer leaded 5 star, but they have to make do with leaded 4 star with some octane booster...