Running/living with: G50 3.2 vs 964 vs 993
Running/living with: G50 3.2 vs 964 vs 993
Author
Discussion

mft

Original Poster:

1,752 posts

252 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
Hi all

I need to sort out a new car, and I keep on being drawn back to the 911, time and time again. I'm after something nice as an only car; it will be used for my daily 12 mile commute, longer trips to Europe (inc. Le Mans and the 'Ring) and track-days now and again.

I'm having trouble weighing up the various older models, as they all have plusses and minuses! I'm drawn to the 3.2 Carrera because it's proper old-school cool, reasonable to buy, and is meant to feel nicer to drive than the 964. I'm drawn to the 964 because it's meant to be a more modern car, but am a little scared of the engine's reliability problems. I'm drawn to the 993 because it's meant to be the fastest and the best handler of all, with cheaper servicing, but now I read that residuals are dropping again?

This is how I see it, on my


Any thoughts, suggestions, abuse?

Patrick1964

746 posts

261 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
IMO a 12 mile commute isn't far enough to look after a 911, all that oil takes a while to get properly warm. However, I think any of the cars listed would be fine in all other respects. A late 3.2 is a bit more old school with crap demisting and heating,but they are more entertaining to drive than a 964. However 964's are a more modern driving car, with a decent-ish heater and good demisting. Neither car is unreliable as such, just make sure whatever you buy has been properly looked after. Can't comment on the 993's as I haven't owned one, but I wouldn't regard any sub £20K Porsche as the depreciation proof buy they once were. Search Hartech's posts on the subject for further info. That said, life is short, and everyone should own a 911 for a while.

HONEYMON57ER

562 posts

240 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all

If a 993 is in your budget then what about
a 996. Very good value at the moment and
lower maintenance costs than the others?

paultje

1,042 posts

269 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
I went from 3.2 to 993C2. The latter is a better bet for everyday motoring....and it's a blast when you want it to be. Refinement (for an aircooled) and fun....and the heater works!!


kennyboy

641 posts

269 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
Perhaps add 'everyday usability' to the list?

Also - have you driven these 3 cars? One man's 'pure 911' is another man's crude bathtub.

tony993

377 posts

245 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
I've had a 3.2 G50 then skipped a generation & went for the 993. I was dissapointed by how heavy it felt when I first got it. I was also surprised by how much sound proofing they'd stuck in it - a good thing for sure, although I wonder how much it all weighs. I'm enjoying it more now that I've had it a while & I couldn't go back to a 3.2. One of my main reasons to move on from the 3.2 was I wanted air con, which is easy to come by in a 993 & v difficult to find in a 3.2. If you buy a car without AC you'll be annoyed with yourself every single day of the summer.

ED965

5,697 posts

253 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
993 all day owned all 3, albeit the 993 is the most modern and most expensive hence:
Fastest/easiest to drive/servicing cheaper/best looking.
Porsche must have got something right after 40 yrs of air-cooled engines.
3.2 Carrera is a great classic though no denying that.