Octane V's RON ratings
Octane V's RON ratings
Author
Discussion

Transmitter Man

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

241 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all
Can anyone on the brain trust point me to a comparison table on the web?

I'm trying to get my head around all the numbers at the pumps.

Thanks

Phil
79 de Tomaso Longchamp GTS

Pigeon

18,535 posts

263 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all
Higher is better What exactly are you trying to compare? British vs. American petrol?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_r

Transmitter Man

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

241 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all
Hi,

Yes, I was aware they used the other measurement in the US.

My reason for asking is two fold.

1. I'm looking into what compression ratio's are being used in street engines on their Regular (or is it Super)petrol. I think it's around 93 octane. The engine I'm looking at is the 5.8 litre 351ci Ford Cleveland.

2. I've also read on more than one site that when one switches from iron to ali heads one can jump a poinmt or two up in compression ratio.

I'm in the very early stages of an engine build and I'd like to run a fairly high comp ratio (within reason) to gain max benefit.

Finding the original fuel data allows me to at least talk the same language.

Phil
79 de Tomaso Longchamp GTS

Matthew-TMM

4,028 posts

254 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
Transmitter Man said:
Hi,

Yes, I was aware they used the other measurement in the US.

My reason for asking is two fold.

1. I'm looking into what compression ratio's are being used in street engines on their Regular (or is it Super)petrol. I think it's around 93 octane. The engine I'm looking at is the 5.8 litre 351ci Ford Cleveland.

2. I've also read on more than one site that when one switches from iron to ali heads one can jump a poinmt or two up in compression ratio.

I'm in the very early stages of an engine build and I'd like to run a fairly high comp ratio (within reason) to gain max benefit.

Finding the original fuel data allows me to at least talk the same language.

Phil
79 de Tomaso Longchamp GTS


IIRC They have regular, premium and super, 89, 91 and 93 PON respectively. PON = (RON + MON)/2. I think their premium and super should be comparible to our premium and super.

Compression ratio is just a geometric thing, an ali head won't make any difference to CR if it's the same shape, but it conducts heat away much faster than iron, so with a switch to an ali head it's best to go up by around 1 CR IIRC.

Transmitter Man

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

241 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
Hi Mathew,

Yes, I wrote it wrong!

It was the fact that switching to ali heads allowed one to run a higher compression ration.

OK, two more questions.

What is the equivalent RON to BP's 102?

What would you consider the maximum CR one could get away with in the UK with said fuel and optimised ignition/fuel supply?

11:1 or maybe more on the street?

Phil

chuntington101

5,733 posts

253 months

Monday 19th March 2007
quotequote all
you should beable to get away with 11-1 on good fuel. the corvette LS1,2,6&7's run around that (maybe a touch lower) and they run on normal fuel.

best of to get a tuner have a look at it just to make sure you're not makeing any dept!

thanks CHris.

Transmitter Man

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

241 months

Monday 19th March 2007
quotequote all
Many thanks Chris,

Phil

Matthew-TMM

4,028 posts

254 months

Monday 19th March 2007
quotequote all
Transmitter Man said:
Hi Mathew,

Yes, I wrote it wrong!

It was the fact that switching to ali heads allowed one to run a higher compression ration.

OK, two more questions.

What is the equivalent RON to BP's 102?

What would you consider the maximum CR one could get away with in the UK with said fuel and optimised ignition/fuel supply?

11:1 or maybe more on the street?

Phil

BP's Ultimate 102 has 102 RON, 90 MON and so the PON would be (102+90)/2=96

As for CR I wouldn't like to say, I have very little experience of any other engines than a 1.4L Ford CVH, I'm just an engineering student who enjoys reading about technical stuff in my spare time. I've a feeling I've read that a few stations in the US sell potent stuff for road use, so I would suggest finding out the sort of CRs people are using for road engines similar to yours using 96PON petrol. Hope that helps. thumbup

Transmitter Man

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

241 months

Monday 19th March 2007
quotequote all
Mathew,

Good luck with your studies.

I'm trying to keep my classic on the road as much as possible which is the reason I searched for a rebuildable engine, the heads that came with the 'two' engines I purchased are of the low compression variety (unlike the better factory heads on the car). For this and other reasons they are only good as door stops!

I'm therefor looking to import some new ali heads with matching inlet manifold and have to decide what CR I want to run:

www.chiheads.com/

Got to try and keep up with the rest of you guys somehow.

Phil
79 de Tomaso Longchamp GTS

Matthew-TMM

4,028 posts

254 months

Monday 19th March 2007
quotequote all
There doesn't seem to be much turning up on google, but for the sort of octane rating BP 102 is the ballpark seems to be around 10.5 or 11:1 for ali heads. However, what I've foind is no better than hearsay. Could you contact the head manufacturer for advice?

Transmitter Man

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

241 months

Monday 19th March 2007
quotequote all
That just may confuse things further as you can bet Aussy fuel is different that BP 102.

I will however mail them to see what response they give.

Thanks

Phil

chuntington101

5,733 posts

253 months

Tuesday 20th March 2007
quotequote all
Transmitter Man said:
Many thanks Chris,

Phil


no probelm mate.

if BP 102 is around 96 octane then you should beable to go 11-1. the US run SBCs at around 10-1 on 93 octane.

thanks Chris.

Transmitter Man

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

241 months

Tuesday 20th March 2007
quotequote all
Thanks Chris,

One concern is that I would prefer to a CR where I'm running max ignition timing rather than having to retard the timing due to pinging.

I suppose what I'm trying to find is optimum CR and to try and stick with filling up with the same fuel.

Thanks again.

Phil