Brake bias valve & brake pipe connections
Brake bias valve & brake pipe connections
Author
Discussion

dnb

Original Poster:

3,330 posts

271 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
I was just looking at David H's Griff project site (it's extremely useful for finding out where all the random bits in the garage actually go!)

I noticed that his Griff has what appears to be a Sierra brake bias valve near the rear diff.
Mine doesn't have this at all, so I wondered what the arrangement was?

Is the biassing built in to the master cylinder or is it in the bodywork near the pedals or does mine not have one for some reason? The pipework looks original, so I very much doubt anyone has messed with it in the past.

Also, on the brake & clutch pipe attachemnt block in the driver's inner wing, what wheel goes where? I know the clutch is at the bottom, but do the rest actually matter? I know I should have written this down, but I forgot to rolleyes


jester7

423 posts

245 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
I am glad you asked that, iam stuck to know what pipes go where.....Doh!!!!

dnb

Original Poster:

3,330 posts

271 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
At least your body is on the chassis!

jester7

423 posts

245 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
Well nearly!!! Hopefully get the body back on the chassis next week, spending the day painting the underside of the body, not nice.

shpub

8,507 posts

301 months

Thursday 5th April 2007
quotequote all
It should have a brake bias valve but it has been known for them to be removed. Not sure I agree with that as it will increase the bias to the rear on a car which is rear biassed already. Without it, the brake balance is defined by the calliper piston sizes and the ratio between front and back. I would recommend fitting a manual adjuster rather than nothing at all.

As for the block, I can't remember either. Probably a case of following the connections through...

GreenV8S

31,018 posts

313 months

Thursday 5th April 2007
quotequote all
shpub said:
It should have a brake bias valve but it has been known for them to be removed. Not sure I agree with that as it will increase the bias to the rear on a car which is rear biassed already. Without it, the brake balance is defined by the calliper piston sizes and the ratio between front and back. I would recommend fitting a manual adjuster rather than nothing at all.


It's important to keep the distinction clear between static balance and dynamic balance. The static balance is determined purely by the overall effective leverage of the pedal, master cylinder, caliper, disc. This is the brake balance you get under gentle braking, for example if you dab the brakes gently while cornering hard or try to stop in very slippery conditions. The static balance should be close to the static weight distribution of the car. To change it, you need to change the geometry or leverage of the brakes, for example with a balance bar.

The dynamic balance determines how the brake distribution changes as you apply the brakes harder and harder. This is usually achieved by putting a bias valve in series with the rear brake circuit, which limits the amount of braking going to the rear wheels as you apply the brakes harder and harder. The dynamic balance should match the amount of weight transfer you get under braking. If you have changed the calipers/discs and are now running at a different line pressure than the bias valve was set up for then you will need to change the bias valve to match. You can get aftermarket adjustable bias valves that make this easy to achieve.

If you remove the bias valve you will lose the ability to cope with weight transfer - you can set the brakes to be balanced under light braking, or heavy braking, but not both. This can be quite dangerous but is frighteningly common with people who have upgraded the front brakes and find the rears aren't doing enough work. Cars like this are an accident waiting to happen imo.

It is possible to use a bias valve to mask the effects of the static balance being wrong (e.g. after upgrading the brakes at one end of the car only) but again this is the wrong approach, you should get the static balance right first and the bias valve doesn't do that.

dnb

Original Poster:

3,330 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th April 2007
quotequote all
Given the car wasn't a hedge-seeking missile last time I drove it, I'll just replace the pipes for now. I have no plans (or money!) to upgrade the brakes at the moment anyway.

Hopefully Clive F will let me look at his brake pipes this weekend

clive f

7,259 posts

262 months

Thursday 5th April 2007
quotequote all
hi dave, no probs, you`ll have to come to me though, alternator at the doctors!

dnb

Original Poster:

3,330 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th April 2007
quotequote all
No problem! Will phone to see if you're in.

v8sag

827 posts

239 months

Thursday 5th April 2007
quotequote all
Hi dnb
I asked this question before,and didn't realize it was just the small cylinder(about 20mm x 40mm) in front of the T junction which I didn't think was a valve.

Edited to add,hydraulic body block,from bottom ,Clutch,rear brakes,front near side,front off side.


Edited by v8sag on Thursday 5th April 22:26

dnb

Original Poster:

3,330 posts

271 months

Friday 6th April 2007
quotequote all
Thanks A big box arrived from Speedflow this afternoon, so I can fit the new lines in the right place now