what engine to go for?
what engine to go for?
Author
Discussion

leemarkadams

Original Poster:

859 posts

245 months

Tuesday 10th April 2007
quotequote all
Hello all, may be looking to buy a Chim for a bit of a 'fun' car, now what engine should I go for? I know the 5.0 is the quickest, but have also heard it is a bit fragile, so to that end is the 4.5 the best compromise?

Thanks

Lee

burriana

16,556 posts

284 months

Tuesday 10th April 2007
quotequote all
leemarkadams said:
but have also heard it is a bit fragile


confused

As a bullet maybe!

burriana

16,556 posts

284 months

Tuesday 10th April 2007
quotequote all
seriously though. There is an opinion that the 4.5 is the sweeter engine because it is running more within it's limits, but the 500 is not that stressed to be honest and you rarely hear of one going bang.

Nuggs

4,640 posts

264 months

Tuesday 10th April 2007
quotequote all
I think they're all pretty much the same for reliability, so I guess it's down to the one that suits you best.

I test drove a 400 and a 500 before buying mine (I went for the 400) - I just preferred the way it droverotate

Flintstone

8,644 posts

277 months

Tuesday 10th April 2007
quotequote all
Test drive as many as you can.

The 400 suited me originally and left me room to trade 'up' (if you want to look at it that way) later.

Now have the 500 and am extremely happy with it.

Jay Ayegees

773 posts

234 months

Tuesday 10th April 2007
quotequote all
Hi

If I'm not mistaken all the 450s use a later development of the RV8 block and as such is cross-bolted for strength - so if you want to carry out any upgrades in future the 450 is probably the best starting point IMO.

Jay

benventura

73 posts

240 months

Tuesday 10th April 2007
quotequote all
I'm really happy with my 400 - especially now it's just come back from having an engine rebuild by Henley Heritage - only problem is trying to stick to 3,500 revs for a what seems like the longest thousand miles in history! I reckon whichever one you eventually choose it'll make you smile!

Neville

george 500

653 posts

248 months

Tuesday 10th April 2007
quotequote all
Jay Ayegees said:
Hi

If I'm not mistaken all the 450s use a later development of the RV8 block and as such is cross-bolted for strength - so if you want to carry out any upgrades in future the 450 is probably the best starting point IMO.

Jay


Sounds like a pretty expensive way of going about it!!

Apparently some later 500s were cross bolted anyway but realistically its still only operating at 55bhp/litre so its not exactly stressed. The engines seem to lunch camshafts rather than anything else and that is down to oil feed anyway.

My advice? Buy the one that feels best- a good 450 is going to be faster than a weak 500 anyway. I love my 500 and there is no way I would trade "down" but there seem to be a lot more 450s on sale at present so that may well offer a better range of choice

jonka

287 posts

248 months

Tuesday 10th April 2007
quotequote all
hi
i bought a 450 and very pleased with it but now wish i had a 500 as george said it is better to get a good 450 than a week 500.

antonyj

5,254 posts

311 months

Tuesday 10th April 2007
quotequote all
leemarkadams said:
Hello all, may be looking to buy a Chim for a bit of a 'fun' car, now what engine should I go for? I know the 5.0 is the quickest, but have also heard it is a bit fragile, so to that end is the 4.5 the best compromise?

Thanks

Lee


I didnt know he was french........

s7paul

2,103 posts

264 months

Wednesday 11th April 2007
quotequote all
I had been looking to buy a Chim for a long time, and read everything I could find to help decide what I wanted. The concensus is that (unsurprisingly) the 500 is noticeably quicker, but I have seen several reports of crankshaft breakage and cracked or porous heads. Whilst the crankshaft problem generally seems to be brought on by lack of correct maintenance, there does seem to be an underlying weakness. And before anyone jumps on me, I know that not many have broken, but on the other hand not that many were built in the first place. If a mainstream manufacturer had a similar percentage of failures, I suspect that it would be regarded as significant. I have never heard of either of these problems affecting the 400, 430 or 450. From my own point of view, I just couldn't afford (literally) to take the risk that I might end up with one of the few cars that have a problem, especially as any Chim now is a relatively old car and you just can't guarantee how it's been maintained. I test drove a 450, and figured that I'd be happy with that, whereas I can't help feeling that if I'd gone for a 400 it wouldn't be long before I wanted the extra power. I picked up my 450 a couple of days ago, and having done a few miles and started to get the hang of it, I can confirm that it's got enough power to get you into trouble very quickly, and it will destroy just about anything on acceleration (except a 500). In your case, it really depends on how often you think you're going to use the extra few tenths of a second on acceleration, or the extra 7 mph on top speed, and how much you need to have a 500 badge on the back. Whatever you eventually choose, get one as soon as you can (but get a good one; I saw some real overpriced tat when I was looking).

george 500

653 posts

248 months

Wednesday 11th April 2007
quotequote all
Failures are fairly rare and only occur in 500s due to higher stress levels. Is it common? No of course not, what with all the griffs our there it is fair to say that any crankshaft failures are extremely isolated.
TBH I would focus on the condition of the car anyway. A knackered 450 will cost more than a good 500 to keep going, you aren't taking much of a gamble by going for a bigger engine and it is only one cvariable in amongst a whole pile of other considerations such as FSH, rust and electrics. Go and try them and don't be put off by scare stories

spend

12,581 posts

281 months

Wednesday 11th April 2007
quotequote all
5.2, 5.3, 5.5 modded engines are quite likely to have been built very carefully, if you can source a car with one of these they will be the best VFM IMHO.

Dave

im

34,302 posts

247 months

Wednesday 11th April 2007
quotequote all
spend said:
5.2, 5.3, 5.5 modded engines are quite likely to have been built very carefully, if you can source a car with one of these they will be the best VFM IMHO.

Dave



Never seen these - they're not TVR built are they?

Seasider

12,728 posts

279 months

Wednesday 11th April 2007
quotequote all
spend said:
5.2, 5.3, 5.5 modded engines are quite likely to have been built very carefully, if you can source a car with one of these they will be the best VFM IMHO.

Dave




Me being polite was never gonna last long Dave

Nuggs

4,640 posts

264 months

Wednesday 11th April 2007
quotequote all
im said:
spend said:
5.2, 5.3, 5.5 modded engines are quite likely to have been built very carefully, if you can source a car with one of these they will be the best VFM IMHO.

Dave



Never seen these - they're not TVR built are they?

Examples here: V8D

im

34,302 posts

247 months

Wednesday 11th April 2007
quotequote all
Nuggs said:
im said:
spend said:
5.2, 5.3, 5.5 modded engines are quite likely to have been built very carefully, if you can source a car with one of these they will be the best VFM IMHO.

Dave



Never seen these - they're not TVR built are they?

Examples here: V8D



Just re-read spend's comment "5.2, 5.3, 5.5 modded engines". So they're not TVR built then.

Not sure that someone new to TVR's should be sourcing a modded car as his first point of entry into the owners world without having had one a while to get used to all of the little 'foibles' and indeed find out if he actually likes the car.

spend

12,581 posts

281 months

Wednesday 11th April 2007
quotequote all
im said:
Just re-read spend's comment "5.2, 5.3, 5.5 modded engines". So they're not TVR built then.

Not sure that someone new to TVR's should be sourcing a modded car as his first point of entry into the owners world without having had one a while to get used to all of the little 'foibles' and indeed find out if he actually likes the car.


Hmmm... Thats tantamount to saying a new owner should only have an entry 4.0..... Coming from a blown owner I find the comment even more surreal?

Dave

im

34,302 posts

247 months

Wednesday 11th April 2007
quotequote all
spend said:
im said:
Just re-read spend's comment "5.2, 5.3, 5.5 modded engines". So they're not TVR built then.

Not sure that someone new to TVR's should be sourcing a modded car as his first point of entry into the owners world without having had one a while to get used to all of the little 'foibles' and indeed find out if he actually likes the car.


Hmmm... Thats tantamount to saying a new owner should only have an entry 4.0..... Coming from a blown owner I find the comment even more surreal?

Dave



Nope...nowhere did I say an entry level 4.0

Factory standard one - perhaps. I live what I say as well. I had a 4.0 for a good year before getting blown so was well aware of the cars characteristics pre and post blown and expense levels pre-blown. I'm assuming you don't. What if you can't stand the car? A modded one will be a lot more difficult to sell on in that scenario.

Everyone would like their P&J to be just a touch quicker/shinier/reliable etc but I wouldn't advise my newly qualified-to-drive son to go blow all his hard earned on the most hard-core car he can find straight away.

A lot of owners start at 4.0 or 4.5 and then get a 5.0 (or Tuscan or whatever)...acclimatisation is the sensible route. Have you owned a TVR before?

Salvador Dali was 'surreal', I'm just prodding you in the direction of prudence.

spend

12,581 posts

281 months

Wednesday 11th April 2007
quotequote all
Many new owners are likely to have previosly owned cars with equivalent (& greater) power to the TVR's... The OP's question was about reliability ~ I dont really see your point.

Dave