D200 or D2X?
Author
Discussion

JonathanP

Original Poster:

51 posts

264 months

Wednesday 25th April 2007
quotequote all
I'm trying to resolve an upgrade dilemma from my D70 to either a new D200 or refurb/allmost new D2X?

I've been trying to do the right thing by upgrading glass first - now have the 17-55 and 7-200 2.8's as my main lenses, and have some Lee filters, reasonable tripod, A3+ printer etc. My main interest is in Landscape/Nature photography rather than sports or studio work.

I think I've got to the point where I can justify upgrading the camera body (particularly to improve ergonomics as well as image quality), but having difficulty deciding whether the extra £900 odd for the D2X is worth it? Assuming that I have the budget and that I don't have a burning hole in my lens lineup, does the D2X offer something extra in its image quality? I know the technical differences, but whats difficult to judge is that "extra" quality that some cameras seem to produce - often not easily quantifiable.

So does anyone have experience of using both cameras - ideally for landscape work - any have any comments?

Thanks,

Jonathan

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

279 months

Wednesday 25th April 2007
quotequote all
I can't comment on the D2X but can confirm that the D200 is a massive step up from the D70 in every single respect (except flash sync speed as no doubt Ken Rockwell will point out, before telling you to buy a D40).

trackdemon

13,476 posts

292 months

Wednesday 25th April 2007
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
I can't comment on the D2X but can confirm that the D200 is a massive step up from the D70 in every single respect (except flash sync speed as no doubt Ken Rockwell will point out, before telling you to buy a D40).



yes

JonathanP

Original Poster:

51 posts

264 months

Wednesday 25th April 2007
quotequote all
Thanks dobbo, yes my son has a D200 so I've used it a bit and certainly looking forward to getting a better viewfinder, bigger LCD and all the extra controls as well as improved resolution! I guess I'm just trying to get a feel for whether I'll always be thinking "should I have spent the extra on the D2x?"

robinw

5 posts

259 months

Wednesday 25th April 2007
quotequote all
I have a D200 and am absolutely delighted with it. It's a dream to use and all of the major functions become second nature within a few days of use. I also use the 17-55 F2.8 and it feels just right on this camera (Bear in mind that the D2X and 17-55 is one seriously heavy combination).

If your living depends on a bomb proof camera then the D2X it may be for you, but personaly I can't see any great benefit in shelling out the extra wedge of cash for the little additional functionality that the D2X offers over D200 (you also lose the convenience of the built-in flash). Many pros are happy with the D200 as their only camera. I can understand why.

That said, like all things in life, if you can afford it and you want it , then go for it.

poah

2,142 posts

259 months

Wednesday 25th April 2007
quotequote all
d200 has less noise than D2X. apart from the better battery is thre any real difference between the two cameras

trackdemon

13,476 posts

292 months

Wednesday 25th April 2007
quotequote all
2 Megapixels. Big deal

rustyspit

462 posts

235 months

Wednesday 25th April 2007
quotequote all
Have you considered a Fuji S5? Might be worth a look if high ISO performance and/or DR are important to you.

lowdrag

13,188 posts

244 months

Wednesday 25th April 2007
quotequote all
I upgraded to the D2X from a D70 but keep both. The D70 is OK as a consumer camera but the D2X is a formidable piece of kit and I heartily recommend it. The D200 I haven't tried but from all accounts it is a superb camera too, but the D2X has incredible battery life and I've never had a dust problem, so well is it sealed. Incidentally I use the same lenses as you plus a few others. In brief, the D70 is my backup but the D2X has taken a hammering over the 18 months with never one hiccup. I love it.

jonathanp

Original Poster:

51 posts

264 months

Wednesday 25th April 2007
quotequote all
Thanks for the comments - I've decided to go with the D200.

Cheers,

Jonathan

beano500

20,854 posts

306 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
JonathanP said:
"should I have spent the extra on the D2x?"
Exactly the same position here. Considered and finally dismissed the S5 Pro as a contender. Dynamic range had it for a while, but no grip and slightly better noise on the D200 from all the reports I've seen.

But value for money is on the side of the D200. £815 at Jessops new, sub £750 secondhand, and even with MB-D200 and spare EN-EL3e we're half of secondhand D2X(s) territory. Even if prices come down massively for anyreason on D2X, there's no real edge apart from being built to cover wars....

...and that difference could buy yet another piece of glass

(You can see that after all this agonising I'm nearly there!!!)