450 SE
Author
Discussion

Stuart Kaiser

Original Poster:

1 posts

278 months

Monday 12th May 2003
quotequote all
Dear Members,
I'm currently looking to purchase a 450.
What's the official difference(s) between the SE and the SEAC?
Cheers,
Stuart.

JohnL

1,766 posts

292 months

Tuesday 13th May 2003
quotequote all
The SEAC has much wilder styling, including a more rounded front and a huge spoiler on the boot. The first few were made with an Aramid Composite (hence the name - don't actually knwo what that is other than some lightweight substitute for fibreglass). Thi was expensive however so most were made of fibreglass.

The SEAC also has rose jointed suspension, it's much more of a racing set up car in general. It will also cost you more. Maybe - on reflection maybe not because 450SEs are pretty rare.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

311 months

Tuesday 13th May 2003
quotequote all
Have a look in here
www.gspovey.demon.co.uk/garage/tvr/models/index.htm
Also try a members fleet search from the top drop downs for more piccies.

Nacnud

2,190 posts

296 months

Tuesday 13th May 2003
quotequote all
From what I've read, just about everything on a SEAC was on the options list (spoiler, kevlar, rose jointing, cam profile, solid lifters, power steering, alloy size); so there is a fair bit of variation. Rounded nose and wider running boards seem to be the only common factor.

In general I think most SEACs were well specified (except kevlar, most are glass) and the engine left the factory in a higher state of tune than the SE. Much more of a screamer, terrible idle and poor torque.

One other difference I've noticed is that the floor of the boot is different (SEAC is flat), which means it is not possible to route the exhaust over the half shaft. SEAC routing is under the diff cradle (lowest part of the car) and hence SEACs treat exhausts as a consumable item. Some SEs have been modified to use the SEAC exhaust routing.

rev-erend

21,619 posts

311 months

Tuesday 13th May 2003
quotequote all
Sounds like you should attend a club meeting and
see the two models back to back and chat to some
owners of both.

Then see which you prefer ...

stainless_steve

6,050 posts

285 months

Tuesday 13th May 2003
quotequote all
Klick on my profile to see a 450 SEAC, my car has carbon fibre in the shell.There are less 450 seac's than 450 se's .But we like all wedges

Steve

stainless_steve

6,050 posts

285 months

Tuesday 13th May 2003
quotequote all

Nacnud said: From what I've read, just about everything on a SEAC was on the options list (spoiler, kevlar, rose jointing, cam profile, solid lifters, power steering, alloy size); so there is a fair bit of variation. Rounded nose and wider running boards seem to be the only common factor.

In general I think most SEACs were well specified (except kevlar, most are glass) and the engine left the factory in a higher state of tune than the SE. Much more of a screamer, terrible idle and poor torque.

One other difference I've noticed is that the floor of the boot is different (SEAC is flat), which means it is not possible to route the exhaust over the half shaft. SEAC routing is under the diff cradle (lowest part of the car) and hence SEACs treat exhausts as a consumable item. Some SEs have been modified to use the SEAC exhaust routing.


dont forget to mention the greatly placed hand brake on the SEAC

>> Edited by stainless_steve on Tuesday 13th May 20:01

Nacnud

2,190 posts

296 months

Wednesday 14th May 2003
quotequote all

stainless_steve said:
dont forget to mention the greatly placed hand brake on the SEAC


I've got a conventional handbrake and a five dial dashboard on mine, Brm Brm's SEAC is the wierd handbrake plus four dials. I don't think it's a SEAC thing, it's just what TVR had lying around when they were produced