504.3HP/444FtLb Standard engine/ecu Subaru
504.3HP/444FtLb Standard engine/ecu Subaru
Author
Discussion

GRD

Original Poster:

41 posts

225 months

Thursday 24th May 2007
quotequote all
Subaru 2003STI UK, standard engine, standard ecu made 504.3HP/444FtLb @1.7Bar on Surrey rolling road tonight, running VP 109Ron oxigenated racegas and full time anti-lag.smile



Here are a few videos of the car....



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3d4Y0EfW13k

http://s177.photobucket.com/albums/w230/g5u5/Subar...





Vixpy1

42,695 posts

286 months

Thursday 24th May 2007
quotequote all
Did'nt waste much time then James hehe

GRD

Original Poster:

41 posts

225 months

Thursday 24th May 2007
quotequote all
Vixpy1 said:
Did'nt waste much time then James hehe
Trying to make up time on getting home....some b@sterd in an M3 was write up my backside...but at £4 a litre i wasnt too keen on wasting it smile



...sure i recognised the number plate from somewhere confused



Edited by GRD on Thursday 24th May 00:30


Vixpy1

42,695 posts

286 months

Thursday 24th May 2007
quotequote all
GRD said:
....some b@sterd in an M3 was write up my backside...
yea, what a

hehe

Edited by Vixpy1 on Thursday 24th May 00:27

EJ Doc

70 posts

238 months

Thursday 24th May 2007
quotequote all
How are you running full anti-lag with a standard ECU?

stevieb

5,253 posts

289 months

Thursday 24th May 2007
quotequote all
EJ Doc said:
How are you running full anti-lag with a standard ECU?
I dont think he will let you know that one...

But i thought anti-lag was against the regs of scooby shootout???

Also would you put the anti lag system on a remaped WRX???

Edited by stevieb on Thursday 24th May 10:53

GRD

Original Poster:

41 posts

225 months

Thursday 24th May 2007
quotequote all
stevieb said:
EJ Doc said:
How are you running full anti-lag with a standard ECU?
I dont think he will let you know that one...

But i thought anti-lag was against the regs of scooby shootout???

Also would you put the anti lag system on a remaped WRX???

Edited by stevieb on Thursday 24th May 10:53
Thats true im affraid frown

No

Cant



mneame

1,486 posts

233 months

Friday 25th May 2007
quotequote all
fuel made a fair difference then!

anti lag, mmmmmmmlickdriving

ScoobieWRX

4,863 posts

248 months

Saturday 26th May 2007
quotequote all
That's a lot of horses for the standard engine although the new ECU's are pretty good, some reckon better than some aftermarket ECU's.

I take it you upgraded the usual injectors, fuel pump, pressure reg, turbo, exhaust, re-map etc....
How much of a thrashing will it take at that sort of power output and is it reliable for everyday use??

GRD

Original Poster:

41 posts

225 months

Sunday 27th May 2007
quotequote all
ScoobieWRX said:
That's a lot of horses for the standard engine although the new ECU's are pretty good, some reckon better than some aftermarket ECU's.

I take it you upgraded the usual injectors, fuel pump, pressure reg, turbo, exhaust, re-map etc....
How much of a thrashing will it take at that sort of power output and is it reliable for everyday use??
this is the rough spec...web guy forgot to include the FPRrolleyes
http://www.greenwoodracing.co.uk/oc_sti_stg4_plus....

The Denso ECU's are extremely good....currently trying out software to work with them, which enables the customer to download different maps themselves eg one map for superunleaded/roaduse and another for say BP102,racefuel,E85 to use for trackwork...which may be another reason not to have to use an aftermarket ecusmile


At the moment it seems lots....had Japfest last weekend...mapping session to 504HP in the week and just got back from scoobyshootout(sprint style event at elvington)...car ran really well today apart from a badly slipping clutch(single plate paddle which was put on when the car was intended for 400HP 360FtLb max use)...managed 7th place against some fairly serious cars running dog boxes, forged built motors, role cages etc....we would have expected to have been in around 3rd too if it wasnt for the clutch problemsfrown

Edited by GRD on Sunday 27th May 23:34


Edited by GRD on Sunday 27th May 23:35

ScoobieWRX

4,863 posts

248 months

Monday 28th May 2007
quotequote all
GRD said:
ScoobieWRX said:
That's a lot of horses for the standard engine although the new ECU's are pretty good, some reckon better than some aftermarket ECU's.

I take it you upgraded the usual injectors, fuel pump, pressure reg, turbo, exhaust, re-map etc....
How much of a thrashing will it take at that sort of power output and is it reliable for everyday use??
this is the rough spec...web guy forgot to include the FPRrolleyes
http://www.greenwoodracing.co.uk/oc_sti_stg4_plus....

The Denso ECU's are extremely good....currently trying out software to work with them, which enables the customer to download different maps themselves eg one map for superunleaded/roaduse and another for say BP102,racefuel,E85 to use for trackwork...which may be another reason not to have to use an aftermarket ecusmile


At the moment it seems lots....had Japfest last weekend...mapping session to 504HP in the week and just got back from scoobyshootout(sprint style event at elvington)...car ran really well today apart from a badly slipping clutch(single plate paddle which was put on when the car was intended for 400HP 360FtLb max use)...managed 7th place against some fairly serious cars running dog boxes, forged built motors, role cages etc....we would have expected to have been in around 3rd too if it wasnt for the clutch problemsfrown

Edited by GRD on Sunday 27th May 23:34


Edited by GRD on Sunday 27th May 23:35
I use a variety of software...Ingenuity, EcuExplorer,ECUedit, ECUFlash. I don't use ECUTEK for obvious reasons but the aforementioned are very good. I can generate .HEX or .BIN files and i can edit them in binary or true numerical values. Works for me although i don't think my rex will be anywhere near 500bhp...even in my dreams although if i hit 300 in time i'll be very happy!! hehe

Fair play to you GRD....maybe when i get a 2.5 i'll come and talk to you wink