RE: BMW X5 gets the M Sport treatment
RE: BMW X5 gets the M Sport treatment
Friday 1st June 2007

BMW X5 gets the M Sport treatment

Big wheels and body kits on the school run


BMW has given the X5 the M Sport look
BMW has given the X5 the M Sport look
This is the new BMW X5 4.8i M Sport. It gets new 19” V-spoke M light alloy wheels (upgradeable to 20” for the full bling), Sports suspension, M Aerodynamic body styling, Sports seats, matt aluminium surround to the side window frames, high-gloss Shadow line roof rails, Anthracite headlining and M leather steering wheel.

You’ll be able to buy one of these leviathans in one of six colours: Alpine White, Black Sapphire, Carbon Black, Monaco Blue, Space Grey, and Titanium Silver.

Inside, Nevada leather upholstery is standard and available in black, grey, beige and saddle brown hues. The M sport comes with Dark walnut interior trim is standard, but customers can specify brushed aluminium, dark bamboo or light poplar at no additional cost.

Power for the car comes from a 4,799cc engine fitted with Bi-Vanos and Valvetronic variable valve technologies to produce 355hp.

4.8 litre V8 unchanged
4.8 litre V8 unchanged
This advanced engine is capable of propelling the car from zero to 62mph in 6.5 seconds before going on to a top speed of 150mph. It’ll manage 22.6mpg on the combined cycle, although a heavy right foot will see that drop considerably, no doubt.

The price for all this uber-SUV-ness is £53,440, with M Sport versions of the 3.0d and 3.0si models following later this year.

Author
Discussion

MK4 Slowride

Original Poster:

10,028 posts

237 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
Proper bad boy motor & a cracking drive, I like the camera in the boot for reverse parking you can switch it on at the lights to check out the tallent behind. Also the reverse parking camera has new field lines for warning of objects.
Although you can get SE or M-Sport there's no Sport or ES.

andyinPembs

5,898 posts

243 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
I can imagine them parked on the double yellows / pavements outside the local school now... rolleyes

Huw Pugh

177 posts

237 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
What have they done?! I always liked the styling of the earlier X5s but that looks poo. Even the wheels look crap.

PastHim

19,187 posts

263 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
22mpg my a*se! And 'aerodynamic body aids' will make all the difference-not!

CatherineJ

9,586 posts

272 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
Looks good.

Not sure about the wheels though

Our diesel only did 25/26 so yes I think 22 is unlikely.

Edited by CatherineJ on Friday 1st June 13:46

LeoZwalf

2,802 posts

259 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
Does that make it an MX5?

john_r

8,354 posts

300 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
LeoZwalf said:
Does that make it an MX5?
We all thought it... but kudos for being the first to say it! rofl

pSyCoSiS

4,309 posts

234 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
LeoZwalf said:
Does that make it an MX5?
Or, X5 M !!

jamoor

14,506 posts

244 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
Those alloys are hideous, BMW alloys are usually quite nice on the sport models.

Hunttheshunt

1,093 posts

269 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
Rather wait for the X5 5.2is or whatever they will call it...assuming they make a top end special! Hmmmm X5 with the V10 from the M5...that could be interesting.

MK4 Slowride

Original Poster:

10,028 posts

237 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
Hunttheshunt said:
Rather wait for the X5 5.2is or whatever they will call it...assuming they make a top end special! Hmmmm X5 with the V10 from the M5...that could be interesting.
V8 4.8is Is what your refering to and it's already avaialble.

Other wheels are avaialble, those are a set of two nasty type wheels the rest are top bannana.

scotty_917

1,034 posts

251 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
Absolutely pointless....unless your a more money than sense footballer or bling rap artist! redcard

Talkwrench

910 posts

262 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
Yup, ugly and pointless in my view - but hey, everyone to their own.

One thing though -

"Power for the car comes from a 4,799cc engine fitted with Bi-Vanos and Valvetronic variable valve technologies to produce 355hp..."

Wow... all that technology and it still produces 30bhp less than my 850CSi -
and I bet it produces a whole lot less torque too!

SJobson

13,804 posts

293 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
The normal X5 which Autocar road tested a few weeks ago looked like a Sport version of the old shape - that's a good thing. This M-Sport version looks nasty.

astrsxi77

306 posts

250 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
Embodies everything a "sports" car shouldn't be. Why do follies such as this get featured on here?
And for that reason, I am OUT.

Marki

15,763 posts

299 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
astrsxi77 said:
Embodies everything a "sports" car shouldn't be. Why do follies such as this get featured on here?
And for that reason, I am OUT.
Drive one then see if you still hold the same wrong ideas

GregE240

10,857 posts

296 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
astrsxi77 said:
Embodies everything a "sports" car shouldn't be. Why do follies such as this get featured on here?
And for that reason, I am OUT.
Bye then.

rimmer

6,689 posts

235 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
WHY? theres no need for this kind of crap

MilnerR

8,273 posts

287 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
It's bad enough having fat middle aged men in Range Rover sports tooling around thinking they're in a supercar, now we're going to have to put up with their wives as well wink

That's a joke btw, before any fat middle aged men take offence.

Mattygooner

5,304 posts

233 months

Friday 1st June 2007
quotequote all
P Diddy's "Behatch" will have no excuses for using his Escolade for drive by's.........