sigma dg 28-300, is this any good
Discussion
It’s an ok walkabout lens, but nothing overly special. I did have the Tamron 28-300 which I sold a little while ago, this was regarded as the better of the two. For general pic’s it will be good enough.
I sold the Tamron for £150, so £80 is a good price. The Nikon 70-300G will be a better lens even though it’s bottom of the range – and as you have stated it is faster at f/4.0-5.6 over the f/3.5-6.3, but you would need to decide if the wider 28mm is what you need over the 70mm for its intended use.
If he has lent it to you, just have a look when you get back at the proportion of shots taken below 70mm, with the 70-300 these would have needed a lens change.
I sold the Tamron for £150, so £80 is a good price. The Nikon 70-300G will be a better lens even though it’s bottom of the range – and as you have stated it is faster at f/4.0-5.6 over the f/3.5-6.3, but you would need to decide if the wider 28mm is what you need over the 70mm for its intended use.
If he has lent it to you, just have a look when you get back at the proportion of shots taken below 70mm, with the 70-300 these would have needed a lens change.
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff