K24 turbos
Author
Discussion

topjay

Original Poster:

786 posts

249 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
Does anyone know the max output on the k24's from the x50 996tt. There seems to be a lot of contradictory stuff out there some say 535 bhp max. Wheareas other well known companies are quoting 575 with remap exhaust and headers. Can anyone throw any light on this?
I undrestood the absolute max they could run to was 590, but obviously you would knacker them at that so what is a realistic power to run on them?

Cheers J

Weltmeister

448 posts

262 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
Without operating the turbos at 100% or "overspeeding them" or overboosting them, then c535 BHP is it.

Allan

996TT_STEVO

4,078 posts

259 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
I don't think it's that what is confusing everyone, I think it's the BHP at Flywheel or wheels that is!

I think they are good for about 580 at flywheel

996TT_STEVO

4,078 posts

259 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
Weltmeister said:
Without operating the turbos at 100% or "overspeeding them" or overboosting them, then c535 BHP is it.

Allan
Allan, I would love to know what you mean by "overspeeding them"

K16 or K24 will only give so much regardless of what programme/flash it has.

Weltmeister

448 posts

262 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
See: A turbocharger consists of a turbine and a compressor. The pressure of the engine exhaust gases causes the turbine to spin. The turbine drives the compressor, which is typically mounted on the same shaft. The spinning compressor creates turbo boost pressure which develops increased power during combustion. A wastegate at the turbine intake limits the amount of boost pressure to protect the turbocharger and engine components. When boost pressure reaches a predetermined value, the wastegate opens to provide a bypass for a portion of the exhaust gases which pass directly into the exhaust manifold.

Wastegates may include a mechanical valve or a solenoid actuated valve. In either case, failure of the valve may result in damage to the turbocharger or the engine. Valve failure may occur due to tampering in an attempt to achieve higher boost pressures. Wastegate failure due to tampering may result in turbo overspeed or turbo overboost which may cause excessive wear and damage to the turbocharger and engine components. Of course, other factors may also cause undesired turbo overspeed or turbo overboost regardless of whether the system utilizes single turbocharging or sequential turbocharging in which a plurality of turbochargers are arranged in sequence and selectively operated as desired.

Effectively if you hold in the boost beyond a certain point by keeping the waste gate closed the turbo will spin beyond its design criteria. It is not just revs but heat. It is a dynamics issue, all to do with the compressor map & way beyond my simple education.

A K24 is around a 27Lb/min turbo. This equates to 270 BHP each at max efficiency.

Cheers

Allan

996TT_STEVO

4,078 posts

259 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
Weltmeister said:
See: A turbocharger consists of a turbine and a compressor. The pressure of the engine exhaust gases causes the turbine to spin. The turbine drives the compressor, which is typically mounted on the same shaft. The spinning compressor creates turbo boost pressure which develops increased power during combustion. A wastegate at the turbine intake limits the amount of boost pressure to protect the turbocharger and engine components. When boost pressure reaches a predetermined value, the wastegate opens to provide a bypass for a portion of the exhaust gases which pass directly into the exhaust manifold.

Wastegates may include a mechanical valve or a solenoid actuated valve. In either case, failure of the valve may result in damage to the turbocharger or the engine. Valve failure may occur due to tampering in an attempt to achieve higher boost pressures. Wastegate failure due to tampering may result in turbo overspeed or turbo overboost which may cause excessive wear and damage to the turbocharger and engine components. Of course, other factors may also cause undesired turbo overspeed or turbo overboost regardless of whether the system utilizes single turbocharging or sequential turbocharging in which a plurality of turbochargers are arranged in sequence and selectively operated as desired.

Effectively if you hold in the boost beyond a certain point by keeping the waste gate closed the turbo will spin beyond its design criteria. It is not just revs but heat. It is a dynamics issue, all to do with the compressor map & way beyond my simple education.

A K24 is around a 27Lb/min turbo. This equates to 270 BHP each at max efficiency.

Cheers

Allan
I kind of agree with this Allan, but can you clarify BHP at Flywheel or Wheels

Weltmeister

448 posts

262 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
Using the Lb/min is always flywheel on an engine dyno. So for example a GT2 after exhaust/filter/ECU programme will deliver around 455 BHP at the wheels for 535 BHP "at the fly" calculated.

Cheers

Allan

topjay

Original Poster:

786 posts

249 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
so realistically no one is getting 550 at the flyweel net alone higher without changing the turbos?

Kurgen

1,447 posts

265 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
Allan, are the turbos limited in terms of torque.?
I know torque is a calculation of bhp, but certain maps produce less power and more (preferred) torque.

Rob

cableguy

2,287 posts

240 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
Weltmeister said:
Using the Lb/min is always flywheel on an engine dyno. So for example a GT2 after exhaust/filter/ECU programme will deliver around 455 BHP at the wheels for 535 BHP "at the fly" calculated.

Cheers

Allan
Allan,

From your experience what effect would Headers have in addition to the Exhaust/Filter/ECU Programme?

C.

Weltmeister

448 posts

262 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
Rob
Torque [mathematical calcs aside]is arrived at simplistically as a result of boost. Particularly higher torque at lower revs, the turbo's are still in the heart of the efficiency envelope.

The turbo itself blows x air per minute,unless it is a variable vane unit, however the higher the revs the less efficient it becomes for a number of reasons....So the midrange is the ideal point to run good boost to achieve great torque.

Cheers

Allan

Kurgen

1,447 posts

265 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
So Allan, what is the most torque you have seen, with 24s.?

Weltmeister

448 posts

262 months

Thursday 12th July 2007
quotequote all
Rob
What I have seen and what the established masses agree with are different. Lets just say that 580lb-ft

Allan