Audi A4 Avant (B6 model) vs. E46 Touring
Audi A4 Avant (B6 model) vs. E46 Touring
Author
Discussion

Isoproturon1

Original Poster:

3,639 posts

230 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
Discuss.

SJobson

13,808 posts

293 months

Wednesday 18th July 2007
quotequote all
The Audi always seems very small inside, to me. BMW is more spacious, or at least feels that way. If going for a smaller petrol engine, the 318i 2.0 Valvetronic engine is much nicer than the A4 2.0 FSI.

Dino D

1,953 posts

250 months

Wednesday 18th July 2007
quotequote all
Nothing to discuss. Answers obvious as you are on the bmw forum!!!

Anyway, which one is the B6? Picture?
What model in particular do you have in mind?

Gad-Westy

16,559 posts

242 months

Wednesday 18th July 2007
quotequote all
Completely biased (obviously) but the one thing I don't like about Audis is that they're FWD, even the quattro's are more or less frot wheel drive. I believe they've adressed this on newer ones but in my opinion, FWD is for hot hatches. The Audi is arguabley a better looking car though and the interior is nicer, if a little dark.

SJobson

13,808 posts

293 months

Wednesday 18th July 2007
quotequote all
The Quattro's not fwd - you're thinking of the Haldex-equipped VAG cars, which are Golf-platform. The A4 has a proper Torsen diff, and it is very nice not to have wheelspin. A BMW really needs an LSD to get near it for traction.

Olf

11,978 posts

247 months

Wednesday 18th July 2007
quotequote all
Which engine?

I drove both and went E46.

Dino D

1,953 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
SJobson said:
The Quattro's not fwd - you're thinking of the Haldex-equipped VAG cars, which are Golf-platform. The A4 has a proper Torsen diff, and it is very nice not to have wheelspin. A BMW really needs an LSD to get near it for traction.
Well not entirely true....My 330i had a distinct lack of wheelspin in the dry for a 230bhp car (it 255's on the back). Only serious provocation in the dry got the rears to light up.

In the wet a bit of a different story but wheelspin was not as big a problem as I thought it would be unless I was flooring the throttle very hard. I agree on the LSD but for different reasons-it makes it much easier,safer and fun to powerslide with a proper LSD.

4WD is great for pulling away fast in adverse conditions but what happens when you have to brake or go into a corner too fast for the conditions?

Edited by Dino D on Thursday 19th July 09:22

Olf

11,978 posts

247 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
Dino D said:
SJobson said:
The Quattro's not fwd - you're thinking of the Haldex-equipped VAG cars, which are Golf-platform. The A4 has a proper Torsen diff, and it is very nice not to have wheelspin. A BMW really needs an LSD to get near it for traction.
Well not entirely true....My 330i had a distinct lack of wheelspin in the dry for a 230bhp car (it 255's on the back). Only serious provocation in the dry got the rears to light up.

My 330d 204bhp with 255's will not wheel spin either. The I reckon you're well within the bounds of the chassis and rubber on these cars right up to 270 to 300 bhp.

alfaspiderman2

1,136 posts

248 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
The BMW is bigger inside than the Audi.

I was very surprised how compact the Avant actually was.

For me, the key issue with Audis is that, once you get to the higher power versions, you are saddled with 4wd which, personally, I regard as being unnecessary





Edited by alfaspiderman2 on Thursday 19th July 13:12

Dino D

1,953 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
alfaspiderman2 said:
The BMW is bigger inside than the Audi.
Really-I always thought FWD packaging gave more room?

Pretty silly chaps at Audi-They stick in dull to drivr FWD for space but end up with less room than their major competitor and have less traction to boot. If you going to use the estate to tow and lug lots of stuff then the RWD makes even more sense!

Imagine a fully loaded 2.0tdi A4 pulling away on a hill on wet day...

Olf

11,978 posts

247 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
I love people who turn up - ask for some input and then FO never to be seen again.

Dino D

1,953 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
Olf said:
I love people who turn up - ask for some input and then FO never to be seen again.
True..these 'Discuss' threads are rather crap but I was bored when I first saw it. Besides, I hvae to keep up the 'I own/had a BMW' and they are better than your Audi-no what you say'. After all, BMW drivers are all wrs you know.

Personally i think this 'reputation' is great - possibly makes for poorer resale values and seeing as though I can only really buy used thats fine by me!

Olf

11,978 posts

247 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
Dino D said:
Olf said:
I love people who turn up - ask for some input and then FO never to be seen again.
True..these 'Discuss' threads are rather crap but I was bored when I first saw it. Besides, I hvae to keep up the 'I own/had a BMW' and they are better than your Audi-no what you say'. After all, BMW drivers are all wrs you know.

Personally i think this 'reputation' is great - possibly makes for poorer resale values and seeing as though I can only really buy used thats fine by me!
Good point.

Buy the Audi. BM's suck.

Isoproturon1

Original Poster:

3,639 posts

230 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
Olf said:
I love people who turn up - ask for some input and then FO never to be seen again.
Well boocks to you cos here I am.

The BMW Touring boot is smaller than the Avant as I transferred the Cannon mat from Avant to Touring and it was too big.

I am trying to justify keeping the Touring but am still swayed towards getting another Audi. So far, the only things I can see going in BMW favour are a) handling; b) equipment.

Isoproturon1

Original Poster:

3,639 posts

230 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
Dino D said:
Anyway, which one is the B6? Picture?
What model in particular do you have in mind?
B6 was 2001-05 car.

Comparing 2.0 20v (130bhp) or 2.0 16v FSI (150bhp) with the 2.0 N42 BMW engine (143bhp).

Dino D

1,953 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
Don't know much about the B6-pictures please?

Olf

11,978 posts

247 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
Isoproturon1 said:
Olf said:
I love people who turn up - ask for some input and then FO never to be seen again.
Well boocks to you cos here I am.

The BMW Touring boot is smaller than the Avant as I transferred the Cannon mat from Avant to Touring and it was too big.

I am trying to justify keeping the Touring but am still swayed towards getting another Audi. So far, the only things I can see going in BMW favour are a) handling; b) equipment.
That's weird - I didn't hear a drum roll.



Dino D

1,953 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
Just saw your other post here: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

I did similair mileages to you and bought a 330i sport saloon and converted it to LPG.

In a nutshell:
no noticeable performance drop (still clocked 255mph but slightly less torque than high octane petrol but didn't really matter on the 330)
Loss of spare wheel-well is a pain but if you fit run flats or keep tyre weld you don't need the spare.
LPG is a problem if there are no pumps near you house but on all major routes filling up was not a problem.

I had all the joy of owning a 'proper' 3 series with less than 330d running costs. Plus I was 'green'!

Just an idea....If you need more info on LPG just let me know- i did loads of research before getting the car and gconverting it.

SJobson

13,808 posts

293 months

Thursday 19th July 2007
quotequote all
Olf said:
Dino D said:
SJobson said:
The Quattro's not fwd - you're thinking of the Haldex-equipped VAG cars, which are Golf-platform. The A4 has a proper Torsen diff, and it is very nice not to have wheelspin. A BMW really needs an LSD to get near it for traction.
Well not entirely true....My 330i had a distinct lack of wheelspin in the dry for a 230bhp car (it 255's on the back). Only serious provocation in the dry got the rears to light up.

My 330d 204bhp with 255's will not wheel spin either. The I reckon you're well within the bounds of the chassis and rubber on these cars right up to 270 to 300 bhp.
I concede I've never experienced wheelspin in the E46s I've tried. But those rear tyres are a silly width; my 540i Touring flashes the ASC light at me quite a bit in the wet, while my previous E34 530i Touring never had a traction problem with sensible sized rubber, but, more crucially, an LSD.

Anyway, my point is that you can plant your foot in a higher-powered Audi, in any gear, and just go. That is quite a pleasant thing. I can quite see that it'd be irrelevant in lower powered versions, except that I'd rather not have fwd.

Back to the A4/E46 comparison - the Audi feels like an appliance while the BMW feels much more intimate. And even if the A4 has a bigger boot, it has a cramped cabin. If you really need the space, you'd consider an A6/5-series, of course, so maybe that's not an issue.

Dino D

1,953 posts

250 months

Friday 20th July 2007
quotequote all
Even Evo are in this BMW drivers are wrs thing. From their review of the 535d and the new lane departure system:

Evo review of 535d

An interesting new feature for the refreshed 5-series, and one that’s standard on the 535d, is a lane departure warning system (the reason for the glass eye in the lower front grille). If you stray over a white line on the motorway it makes the wheel gently buzz, which is less disconcerting than CitroÛn’s vibrating seat, and it remains inactive if you indicate when swapping lanes, although I suppose most BMW drivers won’t ever discover that…

Go on, buy a BMW and drive like tosser and lets push the residuals down together!!