RE: Disabled Drivers Do The Dirty
RE: Disabled Drivers Do The Dirty
Monday 30th July 2007

Disabled Drivers Do The Dirty

Disabled driver gang profit from VAT-free privileges


Sixty disabled drivers are being investigated for buying and selling both high-performance and

Even Aston made disabled car list
Even Aston made disabled car list
luxury cars at a huge profit.

Disabled drivers are exempt from paying VAT on their personal vehicles, so the suspects involved in this scam have been taking advantage by allegedly buying discounted Aston Martins, Range Rovers and Lamborghinis, only to sell them on immediately for slightly below list.

The cars would be bought as standard, but ordered with minor modifications such as steering wheel knobs, to pass disability scrutinizing. Afterwards, the devices would be removed and the car sold for a knock down rate.

Ranger Rovers proved most popular choice
Ranger Rovers proved most popular choice

A Range Rover (the most commonly bought car in this scam) would have been bought for just £53,000 then modified and sold back to the dealer for £57,000.

The scam is said to have cost the tax payer over £225million. One suspect is thought to have purchased 37 'personal' cars in one month.

A source close to the enquiry said: “In some cases, it’s been carried out by paralympians funded by the taxpayers in the first place.”

This has been billed as ‘one of the biggest and simplest frauds to hit Britain in recent years’.

Source: The Sun

Author
Discussion

RacingPete

Original Poster:

9,146 posts

227 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
the article said:
The scam is said to have cost the tax payer over £225million
Surely this should be costing the government, and not the tax payer... and thus this is suddenly a crime and not a clever rouse. If this had been a discount by a company who messed up and this was found out it wouldn't be classed as fraud (i.e. hovers free flight promotion that nearly made them bust)

Edited by RacingPete on Monday 30th July 17:02

tuffer

8,961 posts

290 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
I Blind guy down my street has been doing this, he was ordering Porsche's with Brail windscreens and then swapping them for normal ones and selling them on.

E39M52003

60 posts

230 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
tuffer said:
I Blind guy down my street has been doing this, he was ordering Porsche's with Brail windscreens and then swapping them for normal ones and selling them on.
I'n qblind .v anddd thtats .;dp jusssrt nort fuonny. Stoppr #.] pikin*g onn.. tohsee less fotunate#'. than yuu.

hairy

323 posts

263 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
we have sold loads of range rovers to disabled people recentley, and to be fair they generally keep them for about three months and sell them on for only a few thousand more then they bought them for. personally dont blame them!!!

carl_w

10,406 posts

281 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
It's a bit of a murky area. If you're VAT-registered and you reclaim the VAT when buying something, you must then charge VAT on it when you sell.

But this is a scam by non VAT-registered individuals who are exempt from paying VAT by their disability. So they're not actually reclaiming the VAT, but I guess they must be registered with HMRC somehow so that the dealer can sell the stuff to them VAT free?

groomi

9,330 posts

266 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
IIRC anybody sellign more than 5/6 cars a year is technically deamed to be a trader. In which case they have to be running a legitimate business with all the red tape which goes with it. Part of that red tape is that if your turnover is over a particular threshold (which I think is around £60k currently) then you have to register for VAT, meaning you have to charge it when you sell a product and thus pay that amount to the HMRC.

If the above is acurate, then they can only legitamately sell one Range Rover a year and remain under the threshold.

Calorus

4,081 posts

247 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
RacingPete said:
the article said:
The scam is said to have cost the tax payer over £225million
Surely this should be costing the government, and not the tax payer... and thus this is suddenly a crime and not a clever rouse. If this had been a discount by a company who messed up and this was found out it wouldn't be classed as fraud (i.e. hovers free flight promotion that nearly made them bust)

Edited by RacingPete on Monday 30th July 17:02
Who pays the Gorvernment?

flattotheboards

6,688 posts

229 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
hairy said:
we have sold loads of range rovers to disabled people recentley, and to be fair they generally keep them for about three months and sell them on for only a few thousand more then they bought them for. personally dont blame them!!!
well it makes sense to do it this way whats the point in suffering from depreciation if you dont have too.

Balmoral Green

42,554 posts

271 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
I should think that the important issue was not paying the VAT, not whether they got a discount or not, as that has no connection or relevance to the wrong doing.

Polarbert

17,936 posts

254 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
How come disabled folk don't have to pay VAT on vehicles?

philbf

9 posts

224 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
That's the big problem with stories such as these. It's a matter of staying politically correct, which makes it all the more devious that it's been done in the first place.
Hats off to them though. Clever thinking

Balmoral Green

42,554 posts

271 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
Polarbert said:
How come disabled folk don't have to pay VAT on vehicles?
They just don't, that's all. It's like special discounts for pensioners, despite them being amongst the wealthiest members of society. Income, affluence, means etc has nothing to do with it. It's just the way it is.

pies

13,116 posts

279 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
philbf said:
Hats off to them though. Clever thinking
Yep,and i guess the gov will now put a limit at which VAT will be charged

groomi

9,330 posts

266 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
pies said:
philbf said:
Hats off to them though. Clever thinking
Yep,and i guess the gov will now put a limit at which VAT will be charged
See my post above. It's already in place and I'm sure this is the ruling which will be used to sort the matter out.

jazzyjeff

3,652 posts

282 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
groomi said:
IIRC anybody sellign more than 5/6 cars a year is technically deamed to be a trader. In which case they have to be running a legitimate business with all the red tape which goes with it. Part of that red tape is that if your turnover is over a particular threshold (which I think is around £60k currently) then you have to register for VAT, meaning you have to charge it when you sell a product and thus pay that amount to the HMRC.

If the above is acurate, then they can only legitamately sell one Range Rover a year and remain under the threshold.
I'm not sure where you got the 5/6 cars a year figure from. Ultimately its down to whether someone can be proved to be running a business or not, as opposed to changing their personal vehicle frequently ;-) Indicators will include stuff like 'owning' several cars at a time, as well as selling at a profit.

As for the VAT-free bit, adapted motor cars can be purchased VAT free (the term is 'zero-rated') by wheelchair users for their personal use (note, they don't have to be the driver). Otherwise, it should only be the value of any disabled modifications, and not the car itself, which qualifies for relief. The onus for zero-rating is actually on the supplying dealer, which makes a decision whether or not to charge VAT on receipt of a signed declaration from the recipient. Therefore, if HMRC think that VAT has been underpaid, they'll be banging on the dealer's door for it... Thing is, this seems to be a loophole that can be open to abuse. There is no question of fraud if the recipient uses the vehicle between the time of purchase and the time of sale - thing is, short of covert surveillance, who is going to prove they weren't? If the car doesn't turn a wheel from delivery to sale then that might look suspect, but by then several months have passed and HMRC don't have teams out checking disabled adapted cars, lol

Oh, and the threshold is currently £64,000.

JJ

jazzyjeff

3,652 posts

282 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
Polarbert said:
How come disabled folk don't have to pay VAT on vehicles?
They just don't, that's all. It's like special discounts for pensioners, despite them being amongst the wealthiest members of society. Income, affluence, means etc has nothing to do with it. It's just the way it is.
I would hardly call having a few grab rails added to your home without VAT constitutes much of a 'special discount' for pensioners. True, some pensioners are very wealthy, but others live in abject poverty and freeze to death over the winter. It just happens that most elderly reliefs aren't means tested.

JJ

brusselsangel

15 posts

227 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
Sorry but why the fCk shouldn't someone legitimately use their disabled status to make an income? Loads of holier than thou self employed peeps use every trick in the book to avoid income tax. corporation tax. inheritance tax etc and no-one complains. The disabled find it hard enough as it is to get employment, access to premises, etc. Let em be.

Balmoral Green

42,554 posts

271 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
Quinny said:
Balmoral Green said:
Polarbert said:
How come disabled folk don't have to pay VAT on vehicles?
They just don't, that's all. It's like special discounts for pensioners, despite them being amongst the wealthiest members of society. Income, affluence, means etc has nothing to do with it. It's just the way it is.
More boocks as usualrolleyes

If you're going to start spreading rumours at least get them right.

As a disabled person who drives a non moddified car I would have to pay the same as you.

If the car is modified, ie hand controls, tail lifts etc, then it is vat excempt.
We knew that, it's in the article, and you have confirmed it for us, so in what way were we wrong? we weren't wrong, so it's not bollox.

Quinny said:
One of the reasons for the concession is that the saving in VAT goes towards the cost of proper mods.
And also offsets some of the residual value when, that car is harder to sell later on. As it cost money to remove proper mods as well as install them.
Thanks for answering the question.



Edited by Balmoral Green on Monday 30th July 20:58

Negative Creep

25,796 posts

250 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
Surely the best way is to only allow privileges below a certain price range? Of course a lot of disabled people need cars, but I fail to see how anyone 'needs' an Aston Martin or Lambo in the same way they need a car to get to the shops

Balmoral Green

42,554 posts

271 months

Monday 30th July 2007
quotequote all
This isn't about 'knocking' the disabled anyway, and it's not about your regular disabled car buyer saving the VAT on a bread & butter car. It's about folks who buy several top end cars a month and exploit a tax loophole which is costing the taxpayer, and the disabled, a lot of money. No doubt the loophole will be plugged, and safegaurds will be bought in, and I bet it will be the needy who will suffer as a result.