Nikon 80-200 or Sigma 70-200.....?
Nikon 80-200 or Sigma 70-200.....?
Author
Discussion

Longers

Original Poster:

4,505 posts

259 months

Tuesday 31st July 2007
quotequote all
Hi all,

Apologies that my only post in this forum for ages is to ask a question but.... I've been thinking about the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 for a while and seeing as the new macro version is now available some bargains for the non-macro version are turning up. However I have just seen this alternative
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/nikon-AF-80-200-2-8D-ED_W0QQ...

Any opinions / alternatives?

Cheers, Longers

VxDuncan

2,850 posts

265 months

Tuesday 31st July 2007
quotequote all
I have the old version of that (nikon) lens and it is fanstaic, if heavy. I challenge you to find a bad review of it!

Very, very sharp and built like a tank!

WOuld swap mine for a 70-200 AF-S VR but am buying a house. Darn it.

Edited to add:
The nikon really isan't much more than the sigma (from HK at least) and will hold its value far better. Thst said the close focus distance is a pig.

Edited by VxDuncan on Tuesday 31st July 18:22

lowdrag

13,188 posts

244 months

Tuesday 31st July 2007
quotequote all
I have both the 80/200 ED (10 years and counting) and the 70/200 VR. The 80/200 served valiantly in my film days and continues to do so on my D2X. The 80/200 was and is a stellar lens being extremely sharp and IMHO slightly better balanced than the 70/200. For portraiture I still prefer it over the newer lens.

I've never used the Sigma so forgive me here but the only question I have about them is quality control. It seems from forums and reviews that Sigma are built down to a price and so you either get a very good or very bad one, but with the Nikkor professional lenses (and the 80/200 is surely that) they are built up to a quality hence the higher price. Personally I'd buy a used 80/200; I know you will never need to reproach the quality of the photos unless of course, it is your fault!

One final point; buy the latest posssible 80/200 you can afford purely because of auto focus etc. Don't be tempted to go for the older push pull variety.

Britcarfan

110 posts

248 months

Tuesday 31st July 2007
quotequote all
I used to have the Sigma, it proved to be faulty and after 3 trips back to Sigma I requested and was given a refund. I purchased the Nikon as a direct replacement and I believe the picture quality is at least as good as the Sigma. I mainly shoot motorsport and have never had any focus speed issues with the Nikon despite it not being an AF-S lens. I would thoroughly recommend it for sure. I purchased mine from www.digitalrev.com and it was delivered from Hong Kong to Cambridgeshire in just 4 days after traveling on 6 flights lol!

Longers

Original Poster:

4,505 posts

259 months

Thursday 2nd August 2007
quotequote all
Thanks for the comments smile

Longers