Limit for Group C cars
Limit for Group C cars
Author
Discussion

TVRleigh

Original Poster:

6,553 posts

242 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
Just out of interest what is the current BHP limit for NA RV8 cars.

as it may be better and cheeper to start off on group C, I don't have the engine as yet, so this will help me decide on what RV8 to use.

Thanks
Leigh

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
The orginal Idea there came about comparing the tuned and lightend tasmins against stock road car chimaeras, and the power/weight at the wheels was about the same at 160-180 per ton.

that then became standard v8's which isnt really much use to regulate things... I think if V8's stay in C they will have to be restricted back to the p/w of the original calculations :-)


Chassis 33

6,194 posts

311 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
What about also limiting Class C to 3.5l engines only to try and negate the torque advantage of a 3.9/4l V8 vs a 2.8/2.9 V6?

Regards
Iain

TVRleigh

Original Poster:

6,553 posts

242 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
so a 200BHP 3.5 should be fine. as the car will be slightly over a ton.

Chassis 33

6,194 posts

311 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
I'd have no problems with that, but then again I don't make the rules! Is there any heads up as to when we can expect a set of 2008 Regulations?

Regards
Iain

TVRleigh

Original Poster:

6,553 posts

242 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
Well Im going to build the chassi 1st, and then get an engine when the rules are released.
As it would be better if I can get a 4ltr cross bolted engine. or did they do a 3.5 cross bolted.

Chassis 33

6,194 posts

311 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
If you use a 3.9l/4l block you should be able to put 89mm liners in it to make a 3528cc (3.5l) engine. Check with someone like CRE or V8D.

Regards
Iain

Guillotine

5,516 posts

293 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
its looking like 200bhp/tonne at the wheels for 2008

also 300 bhp/tonne atw for B

andy

(remember, you can add ballast as well remove weight/power wink)

Chassis 33

6,194 posts

311 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
Yeah, but adding weight is just making a stick for your own back!!! wink
...note to self...must lose weight this winter...
Regards
Iain

TVRleigh

Original Poster:

6,553 posts

242 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
O thats better esp if its at the wheel not the fly.
should be able to put a 4ltr in at that spec.

anyone know what weight the tasmins come in at once they are stripped out for racing.

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
i've got a list of the p/w figures from 2004 and the 11 tasmins went from 1082 to 1141 including driver, measured at the end of the race.

the then class A ( lowest power) class cars were coming out at about 130 bhp per ton and the class B cars 210-230 ( wheel figures)

class A is equivalent to class C now and class B to the bottom of current class B...

now those power figures are probably a bit low, but a jump to 200bhp/ton would seem to high imho..

The front running v6 car in class C is quoted at just over 200 at the flywheel, and a 2.8 is only good for 190 without spending huge amounts of cash...

Isnt a stock v8 disco listed as about 190 bhp...

maybe you could use a 3.5 v8 out of a stage 1 v8 109 landrover, complete with the speed restricting distributor hehe

TVRleigh

Original Poster:

6,553 posts

242 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
Well I'll wait till it's been agreed and then get a engine to suit.
There's a lot of scope for the RV8.

The stock SD1 vitesse or stock 3.5i was 190 BHP at the fly. I don't think the 4lr LR was much more. but had more room for tuning.

I think a 3.5 tuned will should have a better power band than a non tuned 4ltr at the same BHP. correct me if im wrong.

Chassis 33

6,194 posts

311 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
Even as a big SD1 fan, I'm a bit sceptical about the 190hp figure for the Vitesses. If the 155hp of the twin SU setup is to be believed, I cant see adding fuel injection giving 35hp, as far as I'm aware there was no difference between SD1 cams, however as I've never had a stock SD1 on the rollers I wouldn't know for sure.

If you're looking for 200hp, its easiest, cheapest and in the long run less stressful to get a 4l and de-tune it if needed as opposed to scream the balls of a 3.5l. however bear in mind the figures Andy as quoted above are at the wheels so you'll lose 15-20% in the transmission from your flywheel figure (or approx 40-50hp depending on which rolling road operator you speak to).

So say your car, for simplicities sake, weights 1000kg with you in it. For class C you need 200hp/1000kg at the wheels (assuming what has been stated becomes law) which is between 230hp and 240hp at the fly. A 3.5l motor is going to have to have a lot of money spent on it to reliably give 240hp, a 4l motor does that with comparative ease. Whichever way you go it sounds like we're going to have a play together next year smile

Regards
Iain

TVRleigh

Original Poster:

6,553 posts

242 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
Well the TVR 350i had the standard vitesse engines drop in with no mods as far as I know, and I know they do get 190BHP at the fly, its about the only TVR that gives the figures the factory say it should have.

Well if I can have 200 at the wheels then I'll get a 4lr, but if it 200 at the fly then I'll use a 3.5

I would have thought a tuned 3.5 would be more responsive than a de-tuned 4ltr.

be fun to be involed anyway. I don't think I'll be able to afford to do a full season, but hope to do 4 or 5 races.

Chassis 33

6,194 posts

311 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
No substitute for cubes my friend!!! The extra torque of the 4l will always give an advantage over a 3.5l IMO, and they should both rev pretty much the same at the top end seeing as they both have a 71mm stroke.

Regards
Iain

wedgeman

1,326 posts

272 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
TVRleigh said:
Well the TVR 350i had the standard vitesse engines drop in with no mods as far as I know, and I know they do get 190BHP at the fly, its about the only TVR that gives the figures the factory say it should have.

Well if I can have 200 at the wheels then I'll get a 4lr, but if it 200 at the fly then I'll use a 3.5

I would have thought a tuned 3.5 would be more responsive than a de-tuned 4ltr.

be fun to be involed anyway. I don't think I'll be able to afford to do a full season, but hope to do 4 or 5 races.
Time to find a few sponsors...

Daftlad

3,324 posts

270 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2007
quotequote all
What power would an old V6 engined M Series car be allowed if it were to run in Class B and in class C?? Say a 1000kgs wet with driver. I ask as this is the route I am likely to take, and engine work will be going ahead soon.

toymota33

161 posts

252 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2007
quotequote all
Guillotine said:
its looking like 200bhp/tonne at the wheels for 2008

also 300 bhp/tonne atw for B
Your having a laugh, he's having a laugh!!!!!!!!!!! laughlaughlaugh

wedgeman

1,326 posts

272 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2007
quotequote all
toymota33 said:
Guillotine said:
its looking like 200bhp/tonne at the wheels for 2008

also 300 bhp/tonne atw for B
Your having a laugh, he's having a laugh!!!!!!!!!!! laughlaughlaugh
Why? Sounds spot on to me yes

trackcar

6,453 posts

255 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2007
quotequote all
wedgeman said:
toymota33 said:
Guillotine said:
its looking like 200bhp/tonne at the wheels for 2008

also 300 bhp/tonne atw for B
Your having a laugh, he's having a laugh!!!!!!!!!!! laughlaughlaugh
Why? Sounds spot on to me yes
there's going to have to be some serious detuning of cars if current class runners wish to stay in the class they're in at the moment ... wink