A bit of advice please.
Author
Discussion

Phil Dicky

Original Poster:

7,194 posts

294 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
Hi there folks,

I'm an absolute novice when it comes to cameras etc, but could ideally do to use one at work.
I deal with glass and crystal decanters and bowls etc and would like to do the photography myself.
I've no real camera so would be starting from scratch, I don't want to spend the earth, but need the photos to look good.
Any suggestions?

Andy M

3,755 posts

290 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
Buy a camera?! wink

Proper answer: Canon 400D/350D + tripod + Canon 100mm Macro lens + good lights



flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

234 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
Buying semi-professional camera equipment is a slippery slope biggrin

It really depends what 'not spending a fortune' means smile £300-400 ? You could probably get a 2nd hand dslr body / macro lens. Or maybe a 'bridge' camera would perform better for you. Really depends on what sort of quality / size of image you are wanting.
(less of the size these days, the consumer digital cameras have similar mega pixel ratings to some semi-pro kit. But as they say, there is more to a camera than its MP rating smile )

Part of the battle with photographing glass is that it has the annoying habit of reflecting / refracting everything around it smile
There are a bunch of small scale portable studio setups for product shots, but if you want to keep the budget down then you may want to try a diy job -

http://www.diyphotography.net/homestudio/super-sim...

I've not tried it, but then i've not tried to do much product photography smile

Hope this helps smile

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

285 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
Andy M said:
Proper answer: Canon 400D/350D + tripod + Canon 100mm Macro lens + good lights
++

What are the photo's for, web or flash catalog or..?

Above will cover it (mebe with a CPL).

2ft+ squaer light box (home made?) couple of lights dSLR and macro/prime lens and your good.

Phil Dicky

Original Poster:

7,194 posts

294 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
So far I'm looking at a Canon 400D/350D and a DIY mini studio, any more tips folks?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

285 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
How good do the photo's have to be?

Are we talking glossy mag 2 page spread or 200x200px wide on the internet?

Phil Dicky

Original Poster:

7,194 posts

294 months

Friday 7th September 2007
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
How good do the photo's have to be?

Are we talking glossy mag 2 page spread or 200x200px wide on the internet?
Looking for both really, for our brochure and web site.

miniman

30,193 posts

293 months

Friday 7th September 2007
quotequote all
flat-planedCrank said:
Cool link, thanks for posting it. I think I'm going to make one of those and try a few shots.

S. Gonzales Esq.

2,559 posts

243 months

Friday 7th September 2007
quotequote all
Phil Dicky said:
Looking for both really, for our brochure and web site.
This is where you might run into a problem - you can get away with a lot when the pics are only for web use, but a proper glossy brochure will be more demanding.

Are your competitors doing their own pics? If they are then fine, otherwise yours might stand out as being home-made.

Also, when doing the sums don't forget to include your time - if it takes you a day to produce a shot that a pro could do in half an hour then you might not be saving much after all.

Phil Dicky

Original Poster:

7,194 posts

294 months

Friday 7th September 2007
quotequote all
S. Gonzales Esq. said:
Phil Dicky said:
Looking for both really, for our brochure and web site.
This is where you might run into a problem - you can get away with a lot when the pics are only for web use, but a proper glossy brochure will be more demanding.

Are your competitors doing their own pics? If they are then fine, otherwise yours might stand out as being home-made.

Also, when doing the sums don't forget to include your time - if it takes you a day to produce a shot that a pro could do in half an hour then you might not be saving much after all.
The problem comes with having to change our stock so much, in addition I would have to be there even if I used a pro so not saving time at all.
the standard of the 'apple shot' in the above link is the standard I'm looking for.....Am I expecting too much

mmertens

397 posts

313 months

Friday 7th September 2007
quotequote all
Another useful link:
http://www.tabletopstudio.com/documents/glass_phot...

As for the camera you need, if only used for this specific purpose a bridge +tripod may serve you well and save quite a bit of cash over a DSLR+lenses. I'd say with a tripod and sufficient light, you won't need good hi-ISO performance so you can look for a strong performer at ISO 100-200 and there are plenty of examples of those... You probably will end up using daylight or fixed lights outside of your light tent so you won't need a decent flash as well.

Just my 2p.
Maarten

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

279 months

Friday 7th September 2007
quotequote all
Phil Dicky said:
the standard of the 'apple shot' in the above link is the standard I'm looking for.....Am I expecting too much
That apple shot still has some nasty reflections in it - If you added a white sheet to the open top/side of the box, and shot with that over the camera, you'd lose a lot (but not all ) of the reflections.

Should be quite easy to achieve. Good luck!