Filtering is Legal

Author
Discussion

Hooli

Original Poster:

32,278 posts

201 months

Saturday 8th September 2007
quotequote all
no idea if this is a repost, but i only found out today.
http://www.motorbikestoday.com/news/Articles/filte...

sjtscott

4,215 posts

232 months

Saturday 8th September 2007
quotequote all
Hooli said:
no idea if this is a repost, but i only found out today.
http://www.motorbikestoday.com/news/Articles/filte...
Unfortunately my incidents were in 2000 and 2002 in London were prior to this case. I was held 50% responsible in both cases by the insurance company even though the driver was in my view 100% at fault in both cases. Going by that article the drivers would have been 100% responsible in both cases.
It is not my intention to have to ever test this again! wink

Dare2Fail

3,808 posts

209 months

Saturday 8th September 2007
quotequote all
If that is the court case I am thinking of then the guys insurance company wanted to pay out on the basis of an 80/20 (bike/car) split. The rider refused and then had to do all the leg work himself. He got the decision he wanted, but it took a long time to get settled. I would have though that insurance companies would be dancing with joy over this, but I get the impression that it will probably change nothing in the long run.

Plus, filtering has always been legal (as far as I am aware), but police take a dim view on it if there is a large speed differential between bike and car/truck/bus/hovercraft...

Taz666

456 posts

214 months

Sunday 9th September 2007
quotequote all
Dare2Fail said:
police take a dim view on it if there is a large speed differential between bike and car/truck/bus/hovercraft...
rofl

virgil

1,557 posts

225 months

Monday 10th September 2007
quotequote all
Dare2Fail said:
...but police take a dim view on it if there is a large speed differential between bike and car/truck/bus/hovercraft...
Thats because according to the article it is illegal. It is certainly unsafe to filter at a high differencial speed, unless someone can convince me otherwise...

DoctorFan

276 posts

200 months

Monday 10th September 2007
quotequote all
Being a newby 'poster' only having been riding motorcycles for 2 years I'm under the distinct impression that filtering really is only appropriate when in heavy, very slow moving traffic (be that on a motorway or through a town)? I've never understood why some riders feel it necessary to 'filter' through traffic on a large A road or dual carriageway at speeds of 50mph and above?!

hiccy

664 posts

213 months

Monday 10th September 2007
quotequote all
Sometimes because you get clots doing 50/60mph in the outside lane of said motorways/dual carriage ways holding everyone up unnecessarily.