Honda conversion residuals
Honda conversion residuals
Author
Discussion

Mclovin

Original Poster:

1,679 posts

229 months

Sunday 7th October 2007
quotequote all
Any ideas what the residuals are like on s2 thats had a honda conversion and all the trimmings like nitrons, uprated pads and supercharger.

I'm wanting to decide whether it would be better to buy a good condition s2 elise for approximately £15000 and then spend £15000 on a honda supercharger conversion and £2000 for nitrons and better pads making a approximate total of £32000 or just buy a new exige s for £34000 unregistered. My main concern is that I like to change cars every 2 years doing roughly 8000 miles a year.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

305 months

Sunday 7th October 2007
quotequote all
Mclovin said:
Any ideas what the residuals are like on s2 thats had a honda conversion and all the trimmings like nitrons, uprated pads and supercharger.

I'm wanting to decide whether it would be better to buy a good condition s2 elise for approximately £15000 and then spend £15000 on a honda supercharger conversion and £2000 for nitrons and better pads making a approximate total of £32000 or just buy a new exige s for £34000 unregistered. My main concern is that I like to change cars every 2 years doing roughly 8000 miles a year.
financially, it will not stack up....

that said, the last S2 SC car with *all* the bit's fetched over £30K...

S Works

10,166 posts

281 months

Sunday 7th October 2007
quotequote all
As above, your sums are probably shy of reality. Better to buy a pre-converted car if you're likely to change it. Performance wise, the Honda'd car will knock the Exige S into a cocked hat.

Your best bet would probably be to try and get an Exige 240R for around 30k if you can, most of the depreciation will have been knocked out of it now.

Mclovin

Original Poster:

1,679 posts

229 months

Sunday 7th October 2007
quotequote all
For a pre-converted S2 with average use, supercharger, nitrons and better pads/discs what kind of money would I be looking at when one eventually comes around? Last week there was a green elise s2 honda with supercharger up for £25,995 which no longer appears to be online, was that about reasonable money?

S Works

10,166 posts

281 months

Sunday 7th October 2007
quotequote all
It really depends on the overall spec of the car, it's history etc. Very subjective. Around the price you're quoting would be the bottom end for a good SC'd S2 I'd say. Most will be pretty high-spec and well looked after. They don't come onto the market often.

Another option is to try and find an NA car which you can then get the blower put on for ~£3.5k

If I were to sell mine, which I'm not, I'd be wanting a number that was around the £23k mark, and that's for an NA car.

Mclovin

Original Poster:

1,679 posts

229 months

Monday 8th October 2007
quotequote all
To add, on a supercharged honda car are the service costs and intervals similar to the k series and toyota? I have four track days allowed to me on the my insurance and the rest will the roughly 6000 miles of road driving.

Poltergeist 666

90 posts

236 months

Monday 8th October 2007
quotequote all
YHM

Rgds

Jerry

S Works

10,166 posts

281 months

Monday 8th October 2007
quotequote all
Mclovin said:
To add, on a supercharged honda car are the service costs and intervals similar to the k series and toyota? I have four track days allowed to me on the my insurance and the rest will the roughly 6000 miles of road driving.
Consumables (tyres, pads, discs etc.) will wear out quicker, naturally. Servicing though is a simple affair. Basically you have two levels. a) oil change, b) oil plus plugs.

WAY cheaper than a K series.

Mclovin

Original Poster:

1,679 posts

229 months

Tuesday 9th October 2007
quotequote all
Someone mentioned in thread entitled "my car is sold" that there is a lot of fiddling required when owning a converted car, is this boocks? Everything I have heard seems to bring me to the conclusion that a converted car is cheaper to run and more fun. The only thing that worries me is whether the car is okay with all the heat generated by a supercharged honda engine.

bogie

17,105 posts

303 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
Mclovin said:
Someone mentioned in thread entitled "my car is sold" that there is a lot of fiddling required when owning a converted car, is this boocks? Everything I have heard seems to bring me to the conclusion that a converted car is cheaper to run and more fun. The only thing that worries me is whether the car is okay with all the heat generated by a supercharged honda engine.
depends on the car...some owners are "natural fiddlers" anyway wink
..and are continuously tinkering with their cars (like me)

Ive had a SC Honda for 2.5 years, done nearly 30K miles in it (80K total) and not had any heat problems. The kits have extra heatshielding fitted in the right places (as the manifold is the opposite way around to the K series)...I do trackdays, sprints etc so it gets well used

the engine maintenance is actually less - just oil changes...the plugs are good for 60K miles

just go and test drive one, you wont be worrying about anything then except where to find the cash to buy one smile

Yee haa!

590 posts

247 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
stupid question is it chain cam?

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

258 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
S Works said:
WAY cheaper than a K series.
Cheap fuel and tax bills on a K takes care of that tongue out

Mclovin

Original Poster:

1,679 posts

229 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
Tax is the same on the honda cars isnt it?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

305 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
Yee haa! said:
stupid question is it chain cam?
Not stupid at all, yes K20A have chain driven cams (in line with just about all current engines)

Yee haa!

590 posts

247 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
that's good i've got a misplaced paranoia of belts snapping

edit: I thought the tax remained the same too?

Edited by Yee haa! on Wednesday 10th October 18:51

Scuffers

20,887 posts

305 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
Yee haa! said:
that's good i've got a misplaced paranoia of belts snapping

edit: I thought the tax remained the same too?

Edited by Yee haa! on Wednesday 10th October 18:51
Tax??

if you mean VED, it makes no difference.

S Works

10,166 posts

281 months

Saturday 13th October 2007
quotequote all
What bogie said. I've spent a fair amount on mine in the year I've had it, but most of that has been bling tat and consumables. I don't fiddle at all (apart from the Nitrons on trackdays).

Mclovin

Original Poster:

1,679 posts

229 months

Saturday 13th October 2007
quotequote all
So basically you get supercar performance and looks for hot hatch running costs.

S Works

10,166 posts

281 months

Saturday 13th October 2007
quotequote all
Er, no.

You get lower servicing bills, but you'll go through tyres, pads, discs etc. at a greater rate. No Elise is going to be hot-hatch money to run, no matter what anyone tells you. It won't however be Porsche/Fezza/TVR money if you get a good one.

4pot

481 posts

255 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
Erm, my S2 Honda's for sale. Check the classifieds on PH or SELOC.

Rich