Speeding Skoda vrs
Author
Discussion

greenBo**ox

Original Poster:

328 posts

230 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
On my way to work this morning i was following a black undercover Skoda vrs, then 2 cars infront of that was a rather basic mondeo, when the 2 cars between the skoda and the mondeo turned off, and we came to a straight both proceeded upto about 90mph with the skoda right on the bumper of the mondeo, eventualy making the skoda brake hard as they came to a sharpish corner. i was in disbelief to what the police officer was doing.. but anyway we eventualy got to some traffic lights and the mondeo turned off, and i followed the skoda onto the dual carriageway were he then rose upto around 100mph, i went upto a reasonable speed below that and followed untill my turning. i thought this was rather weird as he seemed to have no regard for his speed. And i know he wasn't going to a job because he didn't have his lights flashing and he eventualy turned off into a bp petrol station.

Dont know if other people notice this behaviour from undercover cops!


Burgmeister

2,206 posts

241 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
i fail to see your point

greenBo**ox

Original Poster:

328 posts

230 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
he was speeding, and we aren't allowed to do that

Edited by greenBo**ox on Wednesday 10th October 15:01

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

248 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
greenBo**ox said:
he was speeding, and we aren't allowed to do that
But he is. And?

Jeremy Kyle

172 posts

231 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
greenBo**ox said:
he was speeding, and we aren't allowed to do that
But he is. And?
im quite sure police need to have a reason to break the speed limit but as we will never know where the black skoda was heading we will never know if he has or has not broken the law.

SS2.

14,712 posts

269 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
greenBo**ox said:
And i know he wasn't going to a job because he didn't have his lights flashing and he eventualy turned off into a bp petrol station.
How do you know he wasn't responding to a call and was told to stand down ?

Even if he wasn't responding, is it really such a big deal ?

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

286 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
Burgmeister said:
i fail to see your point
He was tailgating another car for no reason other than to goad them into going faster. I have seen and experienced this numerous times with unmarked cars.

Munter

31,331 posts

272 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
Burgmeister said:
i fail to see your point
He was tailgating another car for no reason other than to goad them into going faster. I have seen and experienced this numerous times with unmarked cars.
I just treat them like other tailgaters. Lift off gently and slow right down. If he's got his blue lights on obviously I pull over and let him through. Otherwise he's just another car.

bluepolarbear

1,666 posts

277 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
Was that the Vrs on the M42?

kxaddict

258 posts

233 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
SS2. said:
greenBo**ox said:
And i know he wasn't going to a job because he didn't have his lights flashing and he eventualy turned off into a bp petrol station.
Even if he wasn't responding, is it really such a big deal ?
Well...yes!

The least the police should do is to set an example to other motorists!

If he got caught, would he be punished the same as the general public? - Doubtful.


Isoproturon1

3,640 posts

232 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
SO he wasn't going to a job because he didn't have his lights on?

It might be news to you, but you don't actually have to have lights/sirens on, on the way to every job.

Why not look up the word 'paragraph' in the dictionary, and make use of them?

H_Kan

4,942 posts

230 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
Regardless of whether he was going to another job or not, he shouldn't be tailgating other drivers. This is dangerous at any speed.

Munter

31,331 posts

272 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
Isoproturon1 said:
Why not look up the word 'paragraph' in the dictionary, and make use of them?
Why cant you read the title of the forum? I'll help you a bit. This is not the Grammar Nazi forum.
rolleyes

^Slider^

2,874 posts

280 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
greenBo**ox said:
On my way to work this morning i was following a black undercover Skoda vrs, then 2 cars infront of that was a rather basic mondeo, when the 2 cars between the skoda and the mondeo turned off, and we came to a straight both proceeded upto about 90mph with the skoda right on the bumper of the mondeo, eventualy making the skoda brake hard as they came to a sharpish corner. i was in disbelief to what the police officer was doing.. but anyway we eventualy got to some traffic lights and the mondeo turned off, and i followed the skoda onto the dual carriageway were he then rose upto around 100mph, i went upto a reasonable speed below that and followed untill my turning. i thought this was rather weird as he seemed to have no regard for his speed. And i know he wasn't going to a job because he didn't have his lights flashing and he eventualy turned off into a bp petrol station.

Dont know if other people notice this behaviour from undercover cops!
Could also have been training.

I recently went out in an unmarked vectra for a training drive so what you saw as tailgating could have been moving to an overtake position as per roadcraft.

Training you are exempt from national speed limits while the instructor says so.

And as others have stated, no need for blues when exceeding the speed limit.

greenBo**ox

Original Poster:

328 posts

230 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
well we were following mid speed traffic for awhile, he only sped up when the mondeo slightly increased speed after the traffic cleared, then he almost quite litrally lept on to the rear bumper as if he was egging it on upto highish speed but didn't attempt to overtake. this was untill the mondeo turned off then he slowed down abit and eventually sped away again on the dual carriageway.
I just found it weird and dangerous how they can flout the law when they're meant to inforce and set example!

and forgive me for not conforming to your ridgid grammer scrutenering, i thought this was a car related forum.

greenBo**ox

Original Poster:

328 posts

230 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
i dont think he had any one else in the car. But i take that could be a possibility.

^Slider^

2,874 posts

280 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
greenBo**ox said:
well we were following mid speed traffic for awhile, he only sped up when the mondeo slightly increased speed after the traffic cleared, then he almost quite litrally lept on to the rear bumper as if he was egging it on upto highish speed but didn't attempt to overtake. this was untill the mondeo turned off then he slowed down abit and eventually sped away again on the dual carriageway.
I just found it weird and dangerous how they can flout the law when they're meant to inforce and set example!

and forgive me for not conforming to your ridgid grammer scrutenering, i thought this was a car related forum.
Was this in national speed limits?

Could he have been looking for the view for an overtake?

Could you see any safe overtaking positions from where you were?

This does sound like a training drive.

Like it or not, we are permitted to exceed speed limts if it would hinder the purpose of the vehicle.


greenBo**ox

Original Poster:

328 posts

230 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
it was a long straight but he didn't seem to move to a position that would suggest he was going to overtake considering the other side of the road was clear for a distance, and yes it was a nsl road.


so if it was a training drive you wouldn't pull over someone? beacause the mondeo was doing over 60 by a fair bit.


^Slider^

2,874 posts

280 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
greenBo**ox said:
it was a long straight but he didn't seem to move to a position that would suggest he was going to overtake considering the other side of the road was clear for a distance, and yes it was a nsl road.


so if it was a training drive you wouldn't pull over someone? beacause the mondeo was doing over 60 by a fair bit.
No we wouldnt because its training, for example we followed a vehicle to around 100 mph but if we stopped and dealt with everyone exceeding the limits the amount of time we would spend training would be too low.

cupra-225-r

18 posts

230 months

Wednesday 10th October 2007
quotequote all
He couldn't of been a good undercover cop, you noticed him!
How did you know it was an under cop car anyway?? Did you see the driver in police uniform? Could it have been Customs? Military? Immigration? The list is endless.